Posted on 07/19/2002 5:32:18 AM PDT by BenF
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon currently holds the unenviable record of being the last Jew, other than security personnel, to have visited the Temple Mount.
It has been almost 23 months since a Jew has been allowed to enter the Temple Mount compound to pray, to dig, or, simply, to be a tourist there. Today, no Jew can enjoy being at the most historic site of the Jewish people, a place of cultural, scientific and religious importance. No Jew can derive any benefit from the law, adopted in 1967, that guarantees the right to free access and worship at our holy sites.
On September 28, 2000, Sharon, then a Knesset member, spent half an hour walking around the enclosed esplanade, jeered at by some 200 Islamic extremists who were egged on by a few Arab MKs engaged in unrestrained verbal violence. Their epithets eventually incited dozens of the protesters to toss rocks in Sharon's direction.
Following disappointment over the inadequate response, serious riots were engineered the next day, a Friday, under the direction of Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat's office via his security services.
After a long delay, the Israel Police, targeted by attacks which caused physical injuries, eventually reacted. Perhaps they assumed that the Palestinian Authority police they had allowed to attend would act to stop the mayhem. They didn't, and the rest, as we say, is history. Arafat had ignited his Al-Aksa Intifada.
In April 1947, the Mandate papers reported that a new Jewish immigrant from Czechoslovakia named Itzkowitz erred while walking though Jerusalem's Old City alleyways. He mistakenly entered the Temple Mount and was promptly stoned to death. He became the last Jew to be in the compound for another 20 years until IDF paratroopers crashed through a gate on the Temple Mount's north side and rushed across its plaza toward the Western Wall, where they hung a flag. For all intents and purposes, we have been rushing away from the Temple Mount ever since.
OF LATE, Sharon has achieved a level of relative security. He has scored a major diplomatic victory in the form of US President George W. Bush's "Palestinian democracy" speech. He has almost neutralized Foreign Minister Shimon Peres.
Nevertheless, he has done nothing to correct the situation existing at the Temple Mount or other Jewish holy sites. Joseph's Tomb and the Jericho Synagogue, lost to Islamic fanatics during the terror war, are located in Area A, a geographic reality which may limit Sharon. The Temple Mount, however, is in Jerusalem, in sovereign Israel. What could be the problem here?
Under cover of the Oslo process and the total indifference of Yitzhak Rabin, Peres, Yossi Beilin and Yossi Sarid, not only did the Palestinian Authority arm itself to the teeth, but it managed to wrest the Temple Mount from the Jewish people and the State of Israel.
The goal was to de-Judaize the Temple Mount. The PA increased the number of "guards" there and provided them with hi-tech communications equipment. They dug out two huge underground mosques. They caused irreparable archeological damage.
And Israel's governments responded with nonchalance. Only archeologist Dr. Eilat Mazar has waged a campaign to save the Temple Mount's artifacts, but her efforts have been stymied. Today's Fast of Tisha Be'av is the culmination of a traditional three-week period of mourning for the loss of the two Temples, Jerusalem and, by extension, our political independence. The Western Wall has recently become a "Weeping Wall." The seepage will certainly damage the site if left unchecked. Turning to the Wakf to fix the problem, though, is self-defeating. The Wakf administration itself has been the most inimical institution of the Temple Mount. Its destructive digging at Solomon's Stables and elsewhere has caused a bulging southern wall and now a leaking Western Wall.
The Wakf seeks to erase the Jewishness of the site. The Israeli government's policy is to avoid overt identification with the site. Israel's High Court of Justice has proven unhelpful and the Chief Rabbinate prohibits entry even though Halacha could permit it.
We are left with the hope that Sharon does not want to be the Temple Mount's "last Jew" and that eventually Jews will be again able to visit the site.
After all, this is democratic and Jewish Israel, not an authoritarian regime such as in most of the Middle East.
Sharon should not be proud of the fact that the Temple Mount still needs to be liberated, 35 years since the call "The Temple Mount is in our hands!" reverberated over the army radio transmitters and two years since he was last there.
We await his next steps.
The writer is secretary of the El Har Hashem Society promoting Jewish rights to the Temple Mount.
Sounds right to me.
Mr Sharon, Tear Down These Mosques!
Courage is needed, and our President Bush is pretending there is something in common between a cult founded on--and by-- Satan and a possessed Madman in Mecca, and our eternal Judeo-Christian culture and civilization.
At the same time, the Temple Mount's religious value simply does not matter - Christians stopped crusades looooooooooooong time ago and so far they are doing quite well.
Yes, God forbid he should happenchance upon this historic Jewish ground. Instaed of bieng struck by its historical significance the poor fellow is struck by rocks from Islamic animals.
But you forget what the primary reason for the first Crusade was: to deal with the Islamic menace which had been crushing and dhimmiizing non-Islamic populations for over 400 years. Islam hasn't stopped its crusading since Mohammed slaughtered his first Jews in the Arabian peninsula in around 627 A.D. (chopping the heads off 600-900 Jews, raping their women, etc. usual stuff for the "prophet of peace").
As far as I understand Crusades did not accomplished much in this respsect, moreover, I was alluding to the fact that Christians simply gave on physically posessing their holy places.
"Mohammed slaughtered his first Jews in the Arabian peninsula in around 627 A.D. (chopping the heads off 600-900 Jews, raping their women, etc. usual stuff for the "prophet of peace")."
It was a usual practice even centuries and centuries later, IMHO, there is nothing remarkable here - all tribes (including ALL European tribes) were chopping heads of their tribal enemies and raped their women up untill the very recen times.
Well, the first Crusade did since it recaptured Jerusalem. Unfortunately it went awry as well, attacking Jews and other non-Latin Christians along the way. I don't believe in having wars over "holy places". I believe in the protection of property however and the preserving of its historical significance including ancient archeological sites such as exist on the Temple Mount. On the other hand, the Islamics believe in historically cleansing this area in order to obliterate the historical Jewish connection with this area. If you believe it's ok to do that then so be it.
It was a usual practice even centuries and centuries later, IMHO, there is nothing remarkable here - all tribes (including ALL European tribes) were chopping heads of their tribal enemies and raped their women up untill the very recen times.
I was talking about the leader and so-called "prophet of peace". A murderer, thief and rapist he was and his contemporary followers pretty well reflect their leader.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.