Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Eisenberg
I understand the horrible Thalidomide itself, which caused birth defects, is the ideal drug for certain conditions, provided pregnant women are not involved. It was the failure of the FDA to act on Thalidomide that put them in the position of being able to endlessly delay everything. In a bureaucracy, approval of anything that turns out to have problems is bad. Endless delays that kill thousands are just fine, because there are no visible victims that can be identified.
11 posted on 07/23/2002 4:42:51 PM PDT by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: thucydides
My dad takes thalidomide daily to keep his cancer in check, and it works great where interferon failed.
13 posted on 07/23/2002 4:49:04 PM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: thucydides
It was the failure of the FDA to act on Thalidomide that put them in the position of being able to endlessly delay everything.

The thalidomide babies were not American. U.S. drug approval procedures were already then sufficient to protect us from this, and yet have become far more stringent over time.

To make a long story short, the thalidomide situation with morning sickness was unique. We now know that pregnant women with non-serious illnesses should not be very early adopters of new drugs which block formation of blood vessels. Overly broad lessons have been drawn from that tradegy.

15 posted on 07/23/2002 5:17:06 PM PDT by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson