Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sarasmom
WHEN a lethal, contagious, biological or chemical agent is unleashed on the civilian population af any particular state of the USA, what action would you encourage the government to take if you live in an adjoining state, or any of the other 49?

I don't have a problem with quarantine, and I'd observe it.

But I don't see what that has to do with confiscating weapons, and I don't see how witholding vaccines before an outbreak helps the situation.




11 posted on 07/25/2002 10:38:58 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
The vaccines have an unacceptably high lethal consequence ratio in relation to an unexposed population.I would not choose to vaccinate my beloved only child for smallpox w/o proven need.

Regarding the weapons aspect-I can only say I know my state, and many others, do not require registration for weapons kept on private property.

Our government was/is actively trying to disarm us.This must be fought against.I respect the police, but 911 is a number I would call for emergency cleanup, not emergency threat.

I have no "illegal" self-defence weapons, and I will not hesitate to employ any of them. ;^)

12 posted on 07/25/2002 11:22:40 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson