Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onedoug
Dismiss the charges, I suppose. If he can't have counsel, then he can't be tried in a U.S. court. Says so in the Constitution.

What would you do?

16 posted on 07/25/2002 1:30:36 PM PDT by OBAFGKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: OBAFGKM
I asked in the sense that if you were a lawyer. Not a judge.

I would NEVER be a criminal defense attorney.

23 posted on 07/25/2002 1:41:42 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: OBAFGKM
Perhaps you missed a point here. The Constitution says the accused shall have the ADVICE of counsel. Counsel can advise a guilty plea.
40 posted on 07/25/2002 2:18:33 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: OBAFGKM
Someone will always defend the guilty and the despicable among us. Someone will always use legal tricks and play games to confuse at least one stupid person on the jury. Those who knowingly participate in letting off the hook murderers and child molestors have the legal right to do that. They have the right to be philosophical and say that they are just part of the system. But they make that choice. If they do, we also have the right to call them disgusting scumbags whom we do not want as friends or neighbors. We have the right to consider them lowlife pieces of human debris.
57 posted on 07/25/2002 2:52:38 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: OBAFGKM
Old West had the solution for perpetrators and lawyers, and the judges seemed to get it.
100 posted on 07/25/2002 3:54:21 PM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson