Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stone Mountain
"...shows a complete lack of understanding of our system.

I disagree. I think it shows that many lawyers, as individuals, are willing to be accessories to crimes.

24 posted on 07/25/2002 1:44:59 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: onedoug
I disagree. I think it shows that many lawyers, as individuals, are willing to be accessories to crimes.

In our system of justice, even a guilty man is entitled to representation. If a lawyer who would defend this man to the best of his abilities is considered an accomplice, then our system of justice fails. This is why I said it betrays a lack of understanding of our system. When an adversarial system is used to determine guilt, there must be advocates on each side willing to argue for their side. Sure it's an imperfect system, but it's better than just about anything else. Many would disagree with that, but I believe that protecting the rights of the innocent take precedence over punishing the guilty.
30 posted on 07/25/2002 1:57:03 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson