Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onedoug
Why stop there? Why not a hundred? A million?

We're human, and so fallible. Though the Constitution is the best hope yet of humankind to so protect us.


I'm not sure I get your point. It seems that your last two sentences come close to contradicting each other. The constitution was written with the rights of the falsely accused in mind.
32 posted on 07/25/2002 1:59:31 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Stone Mountain
It is one thing to defend a man to the best of your abilities when you "think" he's innocent. It is quite another thing to lie, twist the truth, harange a witness you KNOW is telling the truth in order to get a win. This man had two witnesses against him and he FAILED a lie detector test. If the attorney didn't figure out the guy was guilty he's too stupid to practice law.

At that point, he had a responsibility to face his client with the facts and try to get him the best deal possible. That is what council is.

What we have now is a win at any cost system, not a justice system. I also think it's the responsibility of the lawyer to ASK the client if he's guilty. He can still represent him in court, but there should be no perversion of the law and truth just to get someone off. If the lawyer legitimately thinks the client is innocent, and then he turns out to be guilty, that's quite another matter. Lawyers have access to all the evidence, what they need is a moral compass that will stop them from abetting a criminal in order to get a fee or advance their career.

213 posted on 07/27/2002 9:46:33 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson