Replies

I am coming to believe that the Clinton Administration and a group of CYA corrupt FBI traitor/sychophants were more concerned about making any right-wing, fill-in-the-blank-with-whatever-liberals-hate-and-want-to-discredit, types take all of the blame for the OKC bombing than with the actual truth of the matter. Clinton was either too chicken to take on Iraq/radical Islam or felt that fingering only the evil, dangerous domestic terrorists (ie: conservatives) was more important in cementing his legacy and getting his conservative-hating, commie-loving wife an eventual Presidency. Probably a bit of both.

The more I learn and hear about the OKC's obvious questions and blatant discrepencies that have been left hanging, (like who was John Doe?) the more I realize just how corrupt and untrustworthy certain segments of the FBI and CIA have become. That woman reporter, Shippers, and numerous eye witnesses like this motel clerk were on to something. The FBI shut them all up. Why?

Call me a tin-foil hatter. I don't see any logical or truthful explanation to the story that only two guys were responsible for this April 19th horror and that they had no ties to or help from any other group.

Perhaps it's even worse.... in 1993, Yossef Bodansky wrote a paper titled "Beijing's Surge for the Strait of Malacca." In it, he drew clear and verifiable connections between the PLA, the Pakistani ISI, the proto Al Qaida, and, Abu Sayyaf. He also notes Bojinka and the desire of the CCP to use "Islamic Terrorist" proxies to attack Western interests both in SE Asia and elsewhere. Naturally, Bodansky's paper was ignored by both Clinton's cabal as well as the sad excuses for "rightists" who are more obsessed with international trade than any sort of true rightist thought. Anyhow, the plan that we've seen come to fruition in stages since the '93 WTC attack via OKC, PA800, the Cole attack, the EP3 attack and of course 9-11 was already apparent as early as the time frame of OKC.

Following a different thread, Clinton's PLA financing, sanitized via the Riady clan, makes one ask the obvious question regarding why Beezlebubba might have been worried about inquiring minds tracing the OKC attack back to Abu (and perhaps "friends" amongst the Makati ME expat "businessmen" community?) and ulitimately back to the ISI and the PLA. And now, we find that it is even possible that the Russian Mafia nee KGB might have had some angles in some of this as well!

I have been around the block a time or two, done lots of business in Asia, seen both the fruadulant and the pristine and generally developed a reasonably sensitive gut feel. My gut tells me that the hairball that is the sequence of attacks on the US both here and abroad since 1991 (please remember that year) are simply a new strategy being employed by those who have wanted to see the US and the West in general fall for quite some time. I urge anyone who really wants to explore this possibility to read "The Perestroika Deception" (Golitsyn) for starters then a healthy dose of Bodansky, Kagan, Kagan, and, please suspend negative judgment for a moment, Nyquist. Then, take step back and up to the 50,000 foot level and review all that has happened between East and West since WW-II with a view towards the possibility of seemingly unthinkable, but if true, grave, continuity of Eastern strategy after the supposed 1989 - 1991 "big change". Please be sure you are not agitated when you do this. Then, think about just what needs to be done...quick.

Now, with that said, perhaps the cover up instincts of those who would get blamed for the failure to detect the grand deception becomes readily apparent.