Skip to comments.
Hollings' refusal of 9-11 widow's gun testimony triggers media attention
The Charleston Post and Courier ^
| Saturday, July 27, 2002
| Schuyler Kropf
Posted on 07/27/2002 8:21:56 AM PDT by PJeffQ
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
1
posted on
07/27/2002 8:21:56 AM PDT
by
PJeffQ
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: PJeffQ
I'll bet if Rosie O'Donnell wanted to come before the panel to talk against guns that the 'RATS would be falling all over themselves to hear her pearls of wisdom.
To: PJeffQ
I say, I say, whoa they-ah little phillie. Now don't be a-filling yore purty little emotional head with big ideas, now.
Ellen Saracini
5
posted on
07/27/2002 8:39:11 AM PDT
by
moyden
To: PJeffQ
Commercial airlines are under Federal Aviation Administration orders to install new, heavier cockpit doors by April 9, 2003. They must lock from inside the cockpit and be strong enough that terrorists can't shoot off a lock or blow up the door.Mean while, the F-16's are ready to blow you travelers out of the sky. The people who think this stuff up are fools with inflated egoes, believing they know better than anyone else.
6
posted on
07/27/2002 8:44:09 AM PDT
by
CWRWinger
To: PJeffQ
Hollings is the senator from Disney, owned completely by the liberals in the entertainment industry who want to abolish the Fair Use Doctrine of Copyright Law. Senator Foghorn Leghorn has no time for "little people" like a 9/11 widow.
7
posted on
07/27/2002 8:46:14 AM PDT
by
Astronaut
To: PJeffQ
"The door has got to be fixed".....HollingsThe Senate and Hollings Senate needs to be fixed first. It's time for him to go. The last good thing he ever did was to put the Confederate Flag on the dome. Hollings is a consistent embarassment to the people of SC. This boot-licking, heritage hating scalawag, be gone!
8
posted on
07/27/2002 8:51:13 AM PDT
by
CWRWinger
To: Astronaut
ahem... I'm sure you meant the senator from Warner Brothers... ;)
9
posted on
07/27/2002 8:58:20 AM PDT
by
goodieD
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: CWRWinger
I think "to carry/not to carry" should be left to the discretion of the pilot.
11
posted on
07/27/2002 9:54:02 AM PDT
by
TiaS
To: CWRWinger
Commercial airlines are under Federal Aviation Administration orders to install new, heavier cockpit doors by April 9, 2003. They must lock from inside the cockpit and be strong enough that terrorists can't shoot off a lock or blow up the door.>>>>>>>>>>
so how does one gain entrance if for some reason all personal inside are inconpacitated and someone needs to fly the plane? Oh I suppose they just shoot it out of the air rather then letting it try to land? (ok maybe I watched airport or whatever to many times, lol)
12
posted on
07/27/2002 10:01:01 AM PDT
by
tickles
To: PJeffQ
This is the same train of though that says...if you don't want your children raped and murdered...keep them in the house 24/7. If you don't like too much graphic sex and violence on TV...too bad, turn it off! Don't want to be robbed or assaulted...then stay in the house and put bars on the windows. We are expected to live like moles while vermin walk around like they own the place!
Hollings is a gutless wonder and he wants the rest of us to follow suit.
To: tickles
so how does one gain entrance if for some reason all personal inside are inconpacitated and someone needs to fly the plane? Oh I suppose they just shoot it out of the air rather then letting it try to land? (ok maybe I watched airport or whatever to many times, lol) More to the point, if the cockpit door really is unbreakable, then any terrorist who manages to get even momentary control of the cockpit via any means will be completely unstoppable. By contrast, if the pilot is armed and the cockpit door is of a design that takes a minute or so to break down, then even a terrorist who takes out a pilot would have to worry that once the door breaks down he's only got a certain amount of ammo--not enough bullets to stop all the attackers.
14
posted on
07/27/2002 10:11:58 AM PDT
by
supercat
To: CWRWinger
"Hollings is a consistent embarassment to the people of SC."
No kidding! Conservatives in S.C. need to wake up! Hollings needs to be thrown out like the piece of garbage he is.
To: PJeffQ
One has to put Hollings in that group of professional politicians that should have been removed years ago.
16
posted on
07/27/2002 10:25:54 AM PDT
by
cynicom
To: demkicker
Senators are only up every 6 years...
word is that Charlie Condon and Bob Peeler are both considering a run at him in '04...
I heard other names too but I forget them right now...
17
posted on
07/27/2002 11:31:03 AM PDT
by
PJeffQ
To: PJeffQ
Wheels have to be round, Hollins, this was discovered when the roads were paved. You got away with blaming the problems on the ruts in the road, Senator, but truth reveals that you are square-wheels are round. You would make a good grave stone, if ever etching tools harder than your head are invented.
To: PJeffQ
If the pubbies had any guts (wishful thinking, I know) they'd use this senile windbag as a poster boy for the congressional elections. Then again, there are dozens, if not hundreds, of slimy, traitorous, criminal RAT pols the pubs could use. If they had any guts.
To: supercat; tickles
Both of you have excellent points.
20
posted on
07/27/2002 1:11:20 PM PDT
by
agrace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson