Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Demand Letter to Hillary Clinton from Donor Peter F. Paul (Must read!)
judicial watch ^ | July 16, 2001 | Peter F. Paul

Posted on 07/29/2002 1:45:22 PM PDT by cody32127

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Saundra Duffy
I have been posting this everywhere, it never got much play, but should...

Monday, June 24, 2002 11:15 p.m. EDT

FBI RAIDS HILLARY'S WAREHOUSE IN WHITEWATER DEJA VU

Ten years ago, L. Jean Lewis, an investigator with the government's Resolution Trust Corporation, was able to piece together a complicated Arkansas bank fraud conspiracy from a treasure trove documents she unearthed in an out-of-the-way Kansas City warehouse.

The result was the Whitewater scandal, which, after six years worth of twists and turns, ended in the first impeachment of an elected president in U.S. history.

New York Sen. Hillary Clinton surely hopes that history isn't repeating itself with the raid conducted by the FBI last month on another warehouse; this one chock full of documents from her 2000 Senatorial campaign.

"The documents were seized in a May 30 raid of a California storage facility containing documents of Peter Paul, the entrepreneur who funded Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign with over $2 million dollars in direct, in-kind contributions which were never reported by Hillary Clinton or her Senate campaign, as required by law," revealed the public interest law firm Judicial Watch in a press release late last week.

The raid is important for two reasons. First, it may yield yet another treasure trove of evidence against the Clintons.

But the second reason may be even more significant. The Justice Department's continuing investigative interest in the Clintons comes despite news last week that the U.S. Attorney for New York's Southern District, James Comey, decided to shut down a key part of the Pardongate probe.

Peter Paul and his Judicial Watch lawyers have been trying to persuade the Justice Department for the better part of two years to take his allegations seriously. But instead they seemed more intent on prosecuting him for stock fraud. That is, until now.

Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman suggested the raid may represent something of a turnabout in thinking among Attorney General John Ashcroft and his colleagues.

"Mr. Paul could have turned the documents about the Clintons over to the FBI months ago under a cooperation agreement," Klayman noted. "Instead, he waits in a Brazilian dungeon for the Ashcroft Justice Department to get serious about this corruption case. So it is a welcome sign that the Justice Department is turning up the heat on this new crime scandal concerning the Clintons."

The FBI raid may also be a sign that the reported no prosecution deal for the Clintons, demanded by Democrat leaders as the price for President Bush getting some of his legislative agenda implemented, is beginning to unravel - since Democrats seem to have kept little if any of their part of the bargain. (See: Bush Insider Claims Clinton Deal Torpedoed Pardongate)

"The search warrant authorizing the FBI raid of the storage facility specifically references the Clintons and the New York Senate campaign," says Judicial Watch.

"The search warrant authorizes the seizure of: Records relating to New York Senate 2000, the Hollywood Gala Salute to President William Jefferson Clinton, the Federal Election Commission, David Rosen and Aaron Tonken... (David Rosen was the Director of Finance for Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign, and Aaron Tonken is a Democrat fundraiser who raised money for the Clintons. Both men have knowledge of Mr. Paul's contributions.)"

Meanwhile, Peter Paul awaits a Justice Department offer of legal leniency in exchange for his further cooperation in the Clinton case. If he returns to the U.S. anytime soon, it could be a sign that for Hillary Clinton, it's deja vu all over again.

21 posted on 07/29/2002 2:32:25 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: ravingnutter
BUMP!
23 posted on 07/29/2002 2:35:25 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Producer Says Sen. Clinton Underreported Campaign Gift

PETER F. PAUL v. WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, et. al. Complaint for Unjust Enrichment; Fraud; Breach of Special Duty; and Conspiracy; Jury Demand. This is a page full of links relating to this case...including a handwritten letter from Hitllary to Mr Paul thanking him for a wonderful evening.

Lawsuit Against Clintons Dismissed After Plaintiff Ruled a Fugitive

24 posted on 07/29/2002 2:37:08 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Oh, that's good.
25 posted on 07/29/2002 2:40:44 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Gee, since Judicial Watch is no longer considered a "right-wing" watch dog group by the mainstream media since filing suit against Cheny. I wonder how or if this will now be covered?

I won't hold my breath, but I'm sure even if this does get wider coverage, Judicial Watch will get their label back.
26 posted on 07/29/2002 2:43:53 PM PDT by Zansman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Would these do???
 Documents related to:

PETER F. PAUL v. WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, et. al.
Complaint for Unjust Enrichment; Fraud; Breach of Special Duty; and Conspiracy; Jury Demand


27 posted on 07/29/2002 2:44:25 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
is this the same Stan Lee as the comic book Stan Lee???
28 posted on 07/29/2002 2:44:32 PM PDT by Benson_Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cody32127
"July 16, 2001

Senator Hillary Clinton

U.S.Senate

Washington, DC

Via Hand Delivery

_____________________

I don't know when this was published...but if it's a reprint from July, 2001....it's too little, too late.

Judicial Watch, IMO, is...and should be...toast.

29 posted on 07/29/2002 2:47:05 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
Hey Ankle

What's the story behind the name "Ankle"?

30 posted on 07/29/2002 2:53:16 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cody32127
What were PP's "anti-communist misjudgements of a quarter century ago" and why would the create a sensitivities issue?
31 posted on 07/29/2002 2:53:16 PM PDT by wtc911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cody32127
Hey Hill, Better get to writing that book. You may need some more cash in the near future!
32 posted on 07/29/2002 2:58:59 PM PDT by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laredo44
His whole communication identifies him as someone with CSON. Circumcision Scars On Neck.

I read somewhere that this guy weighed over 14 lbs when he was born. Three days later he only weighed 5 lbs 2 oz. ... he was circumsized. ... they threw the wrong part away.

33 posted on 07/29/2002 3:05:28 PM PDT by slimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
C'mon, you know---thick ankles.
34 posted on 07/29/2002 3:05:57 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cody32127
>> I enjoyed your warmth and friendship during this period from June through August, 2000, when you and the President made my wife and I feel like family. Your warm letters and phone calls, your embraces and kisses when we met, the meals and events we shared together, and especially your and Chelsea’s heartfelt introduction of my wife to Barbara Streisand, led me to believe that we had succeeded in forging a real family friendship. <<

WHAT A MAROON!

35 posted on 07/29/2002 3:06:44 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cody32127
You know what the liberals will say - "Oh, sure it's illegal, but everyone does it." So then it's ok, just like jerkin' the gherkin in the Oval Office sink.

Nothing to see here, move along and pay your taxes, sheeple.

36 posted on 07/29/2002 3:08:54 PM PDT by GaltMeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
>>What's the story behind the name "Ankle"?<<

The more accurate term would be "Cankle." You see, Hillary's calves are the same thickness as her ankles, making them virtually indistinguishable from one another.

In other words, she doesn't have "calves" and "ankles," she has "cankles."

37 posted on 07/29/2002 3:09:20 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
That's what I thought, but with the singular name, it made me wonder if something had happened I had not heard about.
38 posted on 07/29/2002 3:09:28 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
LOL! There is so much to Her Thighness, isn't there?
39 posted on 07/29/2002 3:10:24 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cody32127
Note to Peter: If you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.
40 posted on 07/29/2002 3:16:20 PM PDT by waxhaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson