Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Landru
"In the end, the hesteria they whip-up -- on whateverinthehelltheywant -- will be in DIRECT PROPORTION to the number of 'Rats who'll crawl outta their rat dens to vote!!"

We cannot run a campaign as if we are afraid to defend the principles we hold dear, my FRiend!! You think the RATS are proud of their National Chairman being a common Swindler and FraudPeddler?!! Who benefits by defending Terry McAuliffe's blatant corruption?!! Not even Slick Willie will stand up fer T-Mac on this stuff!!

Good opinions, though, and I will respond as time allows...MUD

473 posted on 09/05/2002 6:05:33 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies ]


To: Mudboy Slim; sultan88; ForGod'sSake
"You think the RATS are proud of their National Chairman being a common Swindler and FraudPeddler?!!"

HA!!
Wellllll...as a matter of fact; yes.
I *do* think they're "proud" this crooked li'l "Rainmaker-Weasel" is in their camp & are inclined to let 'em do whatever he damned well pleases as his, *payment*; for, their's is a purely symbiotic association/relationship, I suspect.

Please: don't confuse "pride," "patriotism," "ethics," et al etc with anything to do with a 'Rat.

In fact, a *good* rule of thumb "is;"
Invert *everything* you've ever known, ever felt, or were ever taught along the lines of "Good & Bad"; whenever, you think of 'Rats.
You'll find yourself light years ahead of the *game* & on-target 99% of the time when discussing or attempting to reason-out this ilk of Liberal-Socialist.

Truth is, methinks they're (McT & Clintigula et al) NOT "Liberal" OR "Socialist" a'tall, Mud.
What they are, is quite possibly the manifestation of the "mob" made "Legal" via the voting booth & courtesy of state-of-the-art propaganda from you-know-who.
Plus, see these snakes for what they really are & there's the added *bonus* your heart won't break nearly as often, too.
Which of course, Mrs. Mud (& *I*) will appreciate, y'know.

I only wished every registered 'Rat voter & anyone else who's looking, would pause a moment to listen to W.Jennings' sage words...
"Are you really sure you want what you see?
Be careful of something that's just what you want it to be"
{!!!!}

"...with Who benefits by defending Terry McAuliffe's blatant corruption?!!"

Ahhhhhh...the 'Rats, themselves?
Or no; how about many, varied & diverse constituent special *interests* who PURCHASE the 'Rat's protection & other *favors* ie trial layers, CPAs, union thugs of every stripe, queers, bitter angry & America-hating ethnic minorities + their caucasion counterparts, retirees afraid for their SS etc ad nauseum...??

Yea, & you *may* nevermind those who're directly profiting -- in any of a number of ways both legal & illegal -- from the 'Rat shenanagans & slight-of-hand, too.

"Not even Slick Willie will stand up fer T-Mac on this stuff!!"

HA!!!
Why should he "stand up fer" anything a'tall, Mr. Mud?
When no one's *asked* except OUR SIDE??
The Bent One, the onipotent/impotent Sink Emporer is up to his chin in rotting kimchee of his own devise.
Like any *good* sheister then, he just keeps his mouth shut unless first asked a question by a recognized authority; which, naturally he doesn't recognize US to be!
No, that Slippery1 is content to let we of the Right continue guessing, acussing, & in short, eating cake!
You & I would be wise to do the same thing, under like circumstances, Mud; then, let time do the rest.

Clintigula's "safe" Mud &, I suspect so is the weasel McAuliff; and, for the same reason(s).
Reason(s) mind you that at best we're ALL left to only speculate on; nonetheless, we have WITNESSED the result(s) of these "reasons" time, & time, & time again.
That part's history you stubborn mule!
(~forgive me, "Stubborn Elephant" wouldn't work... :o) )

...just where the hell have you been for the past 8 years, anyway?

474 posted on 09/05/2002 8:00:10 AM PDT by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]

To: Mudboy Slim
Oh yea; one more thing...

"We cannot run a campaign as if we are afraid to defend the principles we hold dear, my FRiend!!"

Who the hell said anything about "fear," Mud?
Since when is knowing your enemy, your enemy's habits & your enemy's *favorite* tricks construed as "fear"?
Especially when said tricks have been hyper-SUCCESSFUL in past engagements??

Aren't you even the least bit curious as to *what* makes 'em tick, why they were successful, eager to learn from the *record* (history) so we can counter their strategies & bag the win, for ourselves next go-around?

Or??
Are you the *kind* who'll don a bright red coat, bang on a drum to announce your coming, & march off to bagpipes a-blaring into heavily wooded surroundings to battle foes who know-not, recognize, & have no rules whatsoever?

Don't know about -- nor speak -- for you; but, *I* study my enemy before we engage whenever possible.

You can bet your boots then, I'll hit 'em as they drop their guard wherever & whenever they present to me *the* hole.
Which incidentally?
Is always in the same place & virtually under the same circumstances since we humans are after all, creatures of habit?!
Understand?

"Fear" these pansy-assed geeks, huh?

...HA! ~right.

475 posted on 09/05/2002 8:20:01 AM PDT by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson