They'd have to read it first...
I heard one of Rubin's many apologists say that he had nothing to contribute to this discussion because he 'wasn't involved in day-to-day decisions'. Give me a break. He makes those phone calls but he's out of the loop?
I'm still waiting to hear a committee with teeth question Rubin about the Plunge Protection Team.
And while we're at it.... why doesn't someone ask Rubin to name the 10 things he did to 'fix' the economy. With specificity. And follow-ups.
They will. And then they will spin it to their advantage. They will purposely ignore the sarcasm and treat it as if it were sincere.
Remember, you're talking about the same bunch of people who take the phrase "insufficient evidence to prosecute" to mean "totally exonerated."
-PJ