Skip to comments.
Disarming Women
Independent Women's Forum ^
| Summer 2002
| Richard W. Stevens, Hugo Teufel III, Matthew Y. Biscan
Posted on 07/31/2002 4:02:46 PM PDT by tarawa
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
07/31/2002 4:02:46 PM PDT
by
tarawa
To: basil
ping
2
posted on
07/31/2002 4:03:09 PM PDT
by
tarawa
To: tarawa
What is the rapist's worst nightmare? A woman with a gun!
To: tarawa
Dial 1911......
.........then dial 911. Sorry for the size of this.
To: tarawa
Two to stop, one to make sure, reload, repeat, call 9-1-1.
Boonie Rat
MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66
To: tarawa
The three women sued the District of Columbia and the officers for negligently failing to provide police protection...Warren v District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981). Typical of cases enunciating the non-responsibility of the police for protecting individual citizens is Warren v District of Columbia in which three rape victims sued the city and its police department under the following facts:
Two of the victims were upstairs when they heard the other being attacked by men who had broken in downstairs. Half an hour having passed and their roommate's screams having ceased, they assumed the police must have arrived in response to their repeated phone calls.
In fact their calls had somehow been lost in the shuffle while the roommate was being beaten into silent acquiesence.
So when the roommates went downstairs to see to her, as the court's opinion graphically describes it, "For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands" of their attackers.
Having set out these facts, the court promptly exonerated the District of Columbia and its police, as was clearly required by [the] fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.
To: Boonie Rat
It goes back to an 1856 U.S Supreme Court ruling. Law enforcement is required only to protect society in general and to provide services to the community at large; it is under no legal obligation to protect any particular individual. This longstanding doctrine means that basically its up to the individual concerned to defend himself in a hostile situation.
To: *bang_list; Jeff Head; technochick99
A 2ndA and SAS ping...
8
posted on
07/31/2002 4:43:36 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: goldstategop
It goes back to an 1856 U.S Supreme Court ruling. Do you have the cite for that case. Sure would like to hit some people over the head with it!!!
Boonie Rat
MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66
To: tarawa
A man looked out his back window one night and saw several men burglarizing his tool shed. He calls 911 for the cops.
Cops: Are they in your house, sir?
Man: No, they're in my tool shed.
Cops: I'm sorry, sir, we don't have the manpower right now. We'll send out men as soon as we can.
Man waits a few minutes then calls back 911.
Man: You don't have to send any officers - I shot all the burglars dead.
Within 5 minutes a swarm of cop cars and ambulances come screeching up, whereupon the burglars are caught and arrested.
Cop: I thought you said you shot them dead.
Man: I thought you said you couldn't come.
To: Boonie Rat
Its South Vs. Maryland. Go and hit people over the head with it.
To: tarawa
Sam Colt can do more for female equality than Gloria Steinem ever dreamt of.
12
posted on
07/31/2002 5:04:10 PM PDT
by
IronJack
To: goldstategop
BUMP
To: goldstategop
Go and hit people over the head with itThanks
Boonie Rat
MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66
To: Pistolshot
Sorry for the size of this.Yeah, you could have made it a lot bigger :^}
15
posted on
07/31/2002 5:37:52 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: dirtboy
And yet.... the mainstream feminist is very anti-gun. Go figure. SAS is getting ready to formally announce our 2nd college chapter in MI. The neatest thing about it is she's a feminist and is using feminist ideals as a strategy to win over the left-ish variety. And, she's an incredibly neat woman, to boot!
To: tarawa
To: tarawa
The police have no legal obligation to protect citizens from crime. When citizens come to understand this fact, they usually want to acquire the means to defend themselves. Even worse, the police are not even there to solve crimes after they are committed!
they are only there to process the victimsfor the FBI statistics: Name?
Address?
Phone Number?
Social Security Number?
Date of Birth?
Marital Status?
etc
19
posted on
08/01/2002 4:30:01 AM PDT
by
bimbo
To: tarawa; Vic3O3
Bumping for my well armed wife!
Semper Fi!
20
posted on
08/01/2002 6:51:59 AM PDT
by
dd5339
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson