[M. Peach]

When homosexuality became acceptable, conservatives feared the "slippery slope." Now we have people screwing animals and having sex with kids (sometimes killing them) and we even have liberals trying to make this acceptable.

Remember the ads showing scantily clad women seductively carressing dogs? How about the ads showing sexily dressed children and academicians calling for "intergenerational sex?"

All we have to do is remember Greece and Rome, and remember what happened to their civilizations when they indulged in "sexual liberation." Now I'm no prude by any stretch, but where in the hell are we heading? What's the "next horizon?"

[Paul Atreides]

I am in complete agreement. We have a Princeton professor, advocating sex with animals, who is hailed as a genius. We have thongs with sexually-provocative sayings being sold for toddlers. We have an organization, NAMBLA, whose sole existence is to break down the barriers between adults having sex with children. We have influential people wanting to infest the Boy Scouts with homosexuals. When the liberals claim they want to do stuff "for the children", that's when the red flags go up.

[rwfromkansas]

The sad thing is, half of the people on this thread.....probably more, will make fun of people like you and me that find bestiality appalling.

To such freepers, hedonism rules.

[andy_card]

All we have to do is remember Greece and Rome, and remember what happened to their civilizations when they indulged in "sexual liberation.

Um, I thought I was familiar with a number of the theories concerning the fall of Rome. But this is a new one. Rome fell because of sex?

[lavaroise]

, but where in the hell are we heading? What's the "next horizon?"

To hell.

We worship such leverages on our bodies, we will earn such leverages.

[Vicki]

What's the "next horizon?"

Hmm, probably the right to have sex with the dead. Necrophilia.