Why don't you understand that you're advocating giving the government the power to control things which aren't necessary for good governance?
Name one post in which I have advocated any increase in government power in this debate.
Exhibit A of my contention above: "In fact, almost every time a moral issue is brought up on a thread, some libertarians leap to the presumption that traditional morality implies the laws to enforce it. "
Tomalak hasn't argued in favor of expanded government power at all. Yet for some reason you leap to the conclusion that he must be advocating that, presumably based on his advocacy of moral restraint.