Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

4 Sue American Airlines Over Search
Yahoo ^ | Fri Aug 2,12:32 PM ET

Posted on 08/02/2002 10:39:08 AM PDT by RoughDobermann

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) - Four New Jersey men are suing American Airlines, claiming they were wrongly removed from an airplane in March and strip-searched because of their Arabic names.

The men, who filed a lawsuit on Friday, say they were headed home from a Florida vacation when airline officials asked them to get off the plane prior to takeoff.

Three employees then searched them in full view of other passengers for 30 minutes, the lawsuit alleges, forcing them to lift up their shirts and lower their pants. The men said the captain eventually apologized and allowed them to get back on the plane.

The men — Eyhab Matari, 25, of Prospect Park, Ehab Abdelaziz, 22, of Paterson, Osama Zeidan, 20, of Clifton, and Waesam Hamdan, 22, of Paterson — are all U.S. citizens of Palestinian descent. They seek unspecified damages in the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Newark.

"I don't feel American now," Hamdan, who was born in the United States, said Thursday during a news conference at a Teaneck mosque. "I feel second class."

A spokesman for the Fort Worth, Texas-based airline declined to comment on the suit, saying the company would not discuss pending litigation.

A slew of lawsuits have been filed against in recent months accusing various airlines of illegally removing passengers who looked Middle Eastern. The American Civil Liberties Union (news - web sites), which has filed a handful of lawsuits on behalf of passengers, has blamed poor airline policies drawn up to respond to the threat of terrorism since Sept. 11.

The latest lawsuit marks the second time American Airlines has been accused of discrimination since last year's terrorist attacks. A Secret Service agent assigned to protect President Bush (news - web sites) was prevented from reboarding a flight to the president's ranch in December.

The man, an Arab-American, said he felt he was mistreated because of his ethnicity.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airseclist

1 posted on 08/02/2002 10:39:08 AM PDT by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
"I don't feel American now," Hamdan, who was born in the United States, said Thursday during a news conference at a Teaneck mosque. "I feel second class."

Those who don't feel American are welcome to leave.

2 posted on 08/02/2002 10:42:26 AM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

They must have run out of 90 year old great-great-grandmothers to search. No kids in line to terrorize by waving a wand over them either, I suppose.
3 posted on 08/02/2002 10:50:01 AM PDT by vollmond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
The oddest thing is that they were let on the plane, and then removed and searched. I wonder why?

It would be interesting if there were statistics on whether Arabs are searched more than others, or if it's just that Arabs feel they have grounds to sue for apparently arbitrary searches, while others do not.

Since it's not the arbitrariness of the searches that might make them illegal, but rather the ethnicity of the "victims," wouldn't such statistics be necessary to proving the case, unless the searchers admitted to bias (either at the time or in court)?

4 posted on 08/02/2002 10:51:53 AM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
"I don't feel American now," Hamdan, who was born in the United States, said Thursday during a news conference at a Teaneck mosque. "I feel second class."

This really does suck for him, and I sympathize. BUT, I think he's being dishonest with himself if he cannot understand WHY he is now singled out. And it's not racism, but a well-founded fear of a group of people out to kill a lot of us. That group (radical islamists) is a subgroup of his larger, Arabic group. Sorry, man.

5 posted on 08/02/2002 10:54:09 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vollmond
They must have run out of 90 year old great-great-grandmothers to search. No kids in line to terrorize by waving a wand over them either, I suppose.

Sad, but true. I remember very soon after 9/11 witnessing a toddler being searched at the gate. Her little backpack being thoroughly searched by the crack security gods...

6 posted on 08/02/2002 10:55:33 AM PDT by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
This really does suck for him, and I sympathize. BUT, I think he's being dishonest with himself if he cannot understand WHY he is now singled out. And it's not racism, but a well-founded fear of a group of people out to kill a lot of us. That group (radical islamists) is a subgroup of his larger, Arabic group. Sorry, man.

I agree. I feel somewhat sorry for these guys. Every time I fly, I get more angry with the genuises that search me. Hence the sympathy.

7 posted on 08/02/2002 10:58:35 AM PDT by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
The fact that they were searched doesn't bother me, but if they were forced to even partially disrobe in the sight of other passengers, as opposed to being afforded some privacy, then they've got a legitimate complaint.
8 posted on 08/02/2002 10:58:50 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWPittelli
Here's all the stats needed-On 9/11, 3000 dead murdered by 19 Arab/Muslims
It's called profiling,so get over it or leave!!!
9 posted on 08/02/2002 10:58:58 AM PDT by Far Right Of Left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
And it's not racism, but a well-founded fear of a group of people out to kill a lot of us.

Easy for you to say. You're not the one being made to drop his drawers in the aircraft cabin under penalty of incarceration.

10 posted on 08/02/2002 10:59:53 AM PDT by OBAFGKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DWPittelli
The oddest thing is that they were let on the plane, and then removed and searched. I wonder why?

Pure speculation, but something tells me that these boys were out to get the spotlight. Perhaps they intentionally arouse suspicion on the aircraft? Note that they held a press conference from a local mosque. How come? P

11 posted on 08/02/2002 11:03:09 AM PDT by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
Personally, I hope they win their law suit. The basis for this is the humiliating manner in which they were treated. If I were asked to disrobe in public I would refuse. If there was a legitimate basis for removing them from the plane they should have been taken to a holding area in the first place.
12 posted on 08/02/2002 11:06:15 AM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
Luckily, I haven't had to fly commercial since October, 2000. On that memorable trip, when I arrived in Macon, GA, (1) the airline had lost my luggage, (2) the car rental agency had lost my reservation, and (3) the hotel had lost my reservation. I had no place to stay, no way to get there, and no clothes.

With luck, I won't ever have to fly on an airliner again...

13 posted on 08/02/2002 11:16:43 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: RoughDobermann
I have mixed emotions on this issue.

When airport security was in the hands of private business (the Airlines), they were not subject to the limitations of the Constitution.

Now that the Federal government has taken control of airport security, a search warrant is required.

I am currently fighting my local city because they are demanding an inspection of my home over a sump pump in the basement. If I do not comply, I will be fined $100 per month.

Being in full compliance of the law, but not willing to submit to a search of my home without a legal search warrant, I have no choice but to stand up and say no. I do not have a sump pump, but refuse to allow any city inspector into my home without the proper legal documents.

If the city could inspect my home according to the law, then they should have no problem getting a judge to sign a search warrant. After two month, they have failed to produce one. Although it would only take me 2 minutes to have my home inspected and declared in compliance with the city ordinance, I must defend the laws of this land and tell them no.

Groan, it looks like I will be running for city councel this next election. This is not something I want to do, but at least I will have a vote and may prevent this city from passing other illegal laws in the future.

Now back to the airline issue. Once again, government is in violation of the Constitution, and they must have a search warrant. The only way that citizens can enforce the rule of law is to bring it to the courts.

In a time of war, this may be difficult and I will allow the government some latitude with airport security. However, they now have the burden to justify the legality of these searches.

This is not easy, and frankly, darn scary. But if the citizens of this country fail to stand up, the government will continue to violate the very laws that they are sworn to uphold.

15 posted on 08/02/2002 11:24:32 AM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
I'm not a lawyer, but... Every time I fly, I see the signs everywhere (even before getting to the ticket counter) that my person, my bags and my car are subject to search. No one is forcing me to fly. Therefore, if I willingly fly, am I not providing tacit acceptance of their "rules"? Just curious.
16 posted on 08/02/2002 11:30:10 AM PDT by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
Once the Federal government took over airport security, the rules changed.

A private business is not required to obtain a search warrant. The government does!

Unfortunatly, the public has not realized this important change. However, in a time of war, the rules are a little different, so keep this is mind.

17 posted on 08/02/2002 11:34:08 AM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
They don't have a beef. This is just for publicity. I'm about as European-American as one can get. I traveled domestically on July 2 via United Airlines and July 23 via United and Alaska Air. I was pulled aside a number of times before boarding for searching. I don't feel bothered by the process as long as the agents don't let the plane go without me. Actually, I feel like they're earning their government pay and benefits and making the plane just a little safer.
18 posted on 08/02/2002 11:54:09 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *AirSec_List
Index Bump
19 posted on 08/02/2002 12:01:32 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
Note that they held a press conference from a local mosque. How come?

Good question
Might also explain why they feel like second-class citizens.
They act like first-class citizens of a foreign culture.

20 posted on 08/02/2002 1:03:12 PM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson