Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police seize rocket launchers, Uzi from home
WTNH ^ | 8/2/02 | WTNH

Posted on 08/02/2002 12:47:22 PM PDT by always vigilant

(New Haven-WTNH, Aug. 2, 2002 2:40 PM) _ Police seized several assault weapons and handguns Thursday from a man who has been served with a restraining order.

The weapons were seized from 55 Emily Road after authorities learned 31-year-old Dominic Simeone, the subject of the restraining order, had registered several weapons.

Included the cache of weapons were two rocket launchers, nine assault weapons including an Uzi and an AR-15, a dozen handguns, 78-boxes of ammunition.

There were also cases marked "explosive" and US Army 30mm ordinance which were seized.

A representative of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms met with New Haven police Friday to discuss the case.

Police say under department policy and state law, people who are issued restraining orders or protective orders cannot possess firearms.

Police say no charges have been filed.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Yep, lets all register them guns.
1 posted on 08/02/2002 12:47:22 PM PDT by always vigilant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
There were also cases marked "explosive"

Cases of spray paint? Ant spray? Shaving cream?

2 posted on 08/02/2002 12:50:33 PM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
Yep, good idea, register your guns. The guy follows the law completely, and has probably been screwed by an estranged wife or gilrfriend, and has them taken. He'll nevr get them back. They will disappear.

and this isn't even news. It says no crages were filed. Shame on the nws service for reporting this.

3 posted on 08/02/2002 12:53:00 PM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flint
Right Guard! The first three ingredients are Denatured Alchohol, Isobutane and Propane!
The best fuel to use for Potato Guns!
NeverGore :^)
4 posted on 08/02/2002 12:54:35 PM PDT by nevergore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
Included the cache of weapons were two rocket launchers

What kind of rockets? I'll bet the press is calling those estes kits "rocket launchers" to make it sound that this guy is worse than he really is.

5 posted on 08/02/2002 12:54:51 PM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
please - who (really) needs rocket launchers? In Conecticut? I am floored...
6 posted on 08/02/2002 12:54:51 PM PDT by nycbiggie1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
Included the cache of weapons were two rocket launchers, nine assault weapons including an Uzi and an AR-15, a dozen handguns, 78-boxes of ammunition. There were also cases marked "explosive" and US Army 30mm ordinance which were seized.

Just your average Freeper firearms enthusiast!

7 posted on 08/02/2002 1:00:54 PM PDT by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
As I read this is was not the WHAT that was taken but the HOW and WHY they were taken that scared the Sh!t out of me.

Look into "Our lady of Peace" act issued by McCain.

8 posted on 08/02/2002 1:00:54 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant; Vic3O3
Hmmm, rocket launchers, (live or de-mil'd)? Also I'm by no means an expert but I don't believe the Army uses 30 mm ammo. They have the 25 mm gun on the Bradley. The Air Force uses a 30 mm round for the GAU-8 on the A-10 Warthog.

If the rocket launchers were real and he did not have them registered as destructive devices then there is a problem. As to the 30mm, I'm not clear on the possesion laws there. The rest of the stuff is entirely legal to possess. Nothing wrong with either having an AR-15 or an Uzi.

If I was him I'd be suing for a 2nd amendment violation regarding the registration issue.

Semper Fi!
9 posted on 08/02/2002 1:00:58 PM PDT by dd5339
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
Police say under department policy and state law, people who are issued restraining orders or protective orders cannot possess firearms.

Now what is the difference?

10 posted on 08/02/2002 1:08:01 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Index Bump
11 posted on 08/02/2002 1:08:21 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: dd5339
If I was him I'd be suing for a 2nd amendment violation regarding the registration issue.

Exactly whom would you be filing this suit against? There is no government agency/or court that recognizes the 2nd Amendment as valid.

You are obviously a gun nut.

(that was sarcasm)

13 posted on 08/02/2002 1:11:07 PM PDT by porte des morts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dd5339
30 mm ammo

Apache gunship gatling guns.

14 posted on 08/02/2002 1:12:56 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
Police say under department policy and state law, people who are issued restraining orders or protective orders cannot possess firearms.
Wow. Do you have to committ a crime to get a restraining order taken out against you? I thought those things were pretty liberally granted. If so, I'm amazed that is all it takes to remove your weapons. Hopefully this will get challenged and beaten.

patent

15 posted on 08/02/2002 1:17:18 PM PDT by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patent
I'm a CT resident.....there was a law passed a few years back, basically it goes like this.....if you're my next door neighbor and I have a bone to pick with you....all I have to say is "I heard him screaming at his wife last night........he's been actin' wack lately"....etc to the boys in blue.......they come in a day or two later and can take your legally owned fire arms away from you. It happened to my brother.
Connecticut, the "constitution state" Indeed.
16 posted on 08/02/2002 1:25:12 PM PDT by taxed2death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: winnipeg
Are people required to register their guns in the USA?

Depends on where you live and what the gun is, ie: since 1934 fully automatic weapons have to be registered with the ATF (don't ask me what I think it stands for). In some jurisdictions all hand guns must be registered, like the Peoples Republic of New York. In others :), like Texas it would be unhealthy for politicians to suggest all guns be registered, lynchings have occurred for less. The Constution, 2nd amendment, guarantees citizens the right to keep and bear arms, but the government is trampling on it as it is many other god given rights. I believe the government would wet itself in joy to have all weapons registered, I also believe they are shaking in their boots at the thought of proposing it. With 80 million gun owners in America, the government must proceed slowly or risk an uprising that could prove fatal for politicians.

Boonie Rat

MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66

17 posted on 08/02/2002 1:26:10 PM PDT by Boonie Rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: patent
Wow. Do you have to committ a crime to get a restraining order taken out against you? I thought those things were pretty liberally granted. If so, I'm amazed that is all it takes to remove your weapons. Hopefully this will get challenged and beaten.

Yes, that was what the Emerson case was about, remember. You know the one that Ashcroft said that the Supreme Court need not hear.

18 posted on 08/02/2002 1:31:16 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: patent
Do you have to committ a crime to get a restraining order taken out against you?

Not at all. Restraining orders are, in many states now, a de facto part of any divorce proceeding, and thanks to the Brady Act, confiscating all the firearms belonging to the divorcing parties is now an automatic part of that process. This is what the US vs. Emerson case (recently dismissed by a cowardly US Supreme Court at the behest of the Bush administration's DOJ) was all about.


19 posted on 08/02/2002 1:33:15 PM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
Take 'em if you can find 'em.......
20 posted on 08/02/2002 1:40:32 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson