Posted on 08/02/2002 3:21:45 PM PDT by blam
Friendly fire deaths linked to US pilots 'on speed'
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
03 August 2002
American pilots in Afghanistan, blamed for a series of "friendly fire" incidents and devastating erroneous attacks on innocent civilians, were routinely provided with amphetamines to tackle fatigue and help them fly longer hours. Pilots were allowed to "self-regulate" their own doses and kept the drugs in their cockpits.
The pilots were provided with the stimulant Dexedrine, generically known as dextroamphetamine and referred to as a "go-pill" by the airmen, when they set off on missions. When they returned, doctors gave them sedatives or "no-go pills" to help them sleep. Pilots who refused to take the drugs could be banned from taking part in a mission.
The use of the drugs is outlined in a 58-page document seen by The Independent entitled Performance Maintenance During Continuous Flight Operations, produced by the Naval medical research laboratory in Pensacola, Florida. It says: "Combat naps, proper nutrition and caffeine are currently approved and accepted ways ... to prevent and manage fatigue. However, in sustained and continuous operations these methods may be insufficient ..."
A statement issued yesterday by the US Air Force Surgeon General's Office confirmed the use of amphetamines by pilots. It said: "During contingency and combat operations, aviators are often required to perform their duties for extended periods without rest. While we have many planning and training techniques to extend our operations, prescribed drugs are sometimes made available to counter the effects of fatigue during these operations."
The use of stimulants by American combat pilots appears to be an open secret within the defence world, although it is believed this is the first time the Pentagon has confirmed their use was officially condoned.
The revelation has fuelled speculation that the use of amphetamines may have been a factor in a series of devastating errors by pilots that led to attacks on Afghan civilians as well as so-called friendly-fire incidents. In the worst friendly-fire incident of the campaign, four Canadian soldiers of the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry were killed and eight injured in April when an American pilot dropped a 500lb laser-guided bomb on their position.
The F-16 pilot, Illinois Air National Guard Major Harry Schmidt, had flown three hours from Kuwait to the combat zone and faced a three-hour flight back afterwards. F-16 missions from Kuwait routinely took up to nine hours.
In addition, few of the pilots based in Kuwait – where they were originally deployed to patrol the no-fly zone over southern Iraq – received the recommended 12 hours rest between missions as they were on double duty.
John Pike, director of Globalsecurity.org, a defence think-tank, said: "Better bombing through chemistry. I think [enquiring whether amphetamine use had a role in the bombing errors] is an obvious question to ask. I am surprised that the question has not been asked before.
"When you look at the original story of the [Canadian] friendly-fire incident it seems that the pilot was being inexplicably aggressive. It goes beyond fatigue or lack of experience or [being a] cowboy or trigger happy or any of the standard prosaic explanations. The simplest explanation is that the guy had eaten too much speed and was paranoid."
Two unpublished reports into the friendly-fire incident reportedly concluded that Mr Schmidt made his error because he failed to properly assess the supposed risk before striking.
Mr Schmidt, a former Navy pilot and instructor at its elite "Top Gun" training school, said he saw muzzle flashes on the ground and believed he was acting in self-defence. Moments later he was informed there were "friendlies in the area". It later emerged the Canadians were taking part in live-firing exercises which America was aware of.
Mr Schmidt's lawyer, Charles Gittins, was unavailable to comment yesterday on whether his client had been taking amphetamines. However, he told the Toronto Star, which revealed the use of amphetamines by pilots: "I don't know. I never asked my pilot if he was medicated. But it's quite common."
The Performance Maintenance manual reveals just how common the use of amphetamines by pilots is. A survey of pilots who took part in the 1991 Desert Storm operation suggests 60 per cent of them took Dexedrine. In units most heavily involved in combat missions, the rate was as high as 96 per cent. During Desert Storm, the standard dosage of Dexedrine was 5mg. In Afghanistan it was 10mg.
The manual itself warns of the potential dangers of amphetamine use, particularly from repetitive dosage. It says: "The risk of drug accumulation from repetitive dosage warrants serious consideration."
Despite this it appears that pilots are under a considerable degree of pressure to take the drugs. A consent form that all pilots are required to sign says use of the drug is voluntary. But it adds: "Should I choose not to take it under circumstances where its use appears indicated ... my commander ... may determine whether or not I should be considered unfit to fly a given mission."
Last month scores of Afghan civilians were killed in the village of Karakak, 100 miles north of Kandahar, after being bombed by American forces which may have mistook wedding celebrations as hostile fire.
As a commercial pilot I know that FARs state any narcotics use while flying is a no no, including cold meds, etc.
History shows that drug use always gets out of hand.
Think Syria, Iraq or Iran would give us permission to overfly their countries on the way to Afghanistan from Incirlik? Not likely. Besides, Turkey is about 500 nm farther away, as the crow flies, than Kuwait is from Afghanistan. This is why the aircraft carrier, for now, is the preferred base for fixed wing fighter operations over Afghanistan until a land base in country is established.
I don't see a very well-made case in this article. As Gunrunner2 pointed out, "go pills" are issued to pilots, but that doesn't mean they are used chronically or irresponsibly. The article seems to use selective statistics, since the percentage of pilots who have used amphetamines is less important than how much and how frequently they have used them. Some pilots in some circumstances may apparently, at their discretion, use amphetamines chronically. If so, the use of "go pills" may indeed be a factor in some cases of pilot error. It should at least be considered, and hopefully is being carefully supervised by relevant commanders.
There may be a connection between amphetamines and friendly fire incidents. However, this article does little other than raise the possibility and support it with speculation, innuendo and incomplete statistics. It is an intriguing thesis, and may be true to some extent. But the information presented here doesn't support a conclusion.
Ultimately, these incidents don't tend to involve only one pilot acting alone: all missions are team efforts, and involve the judgment of several well-trained professionals acting in concert. We owe it to those involved to consider all factors when investigating and discussing friendly fire/collateral damage incidents.
Imal
Thanks. I suspected that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.