Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 08/06/2002 1:02:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Flame war.



Skip to comments.

HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?
The Cato Institute ^ | August 3, 2002 | By Veronique de Rugy

Posted on 08/04/2002 8:30:36 PM PDT by Uncle Bill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 921-932 next last
To: Keyes For President
Thanks for proving my point ;^)
601 posted on 08/05/2002 3:54:03 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
Read the entire thing, dearie.
602 posted on 08/05/2002 3:54:54 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 599 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
It's their reason for being...
603 posted on 08/05/2002 4:02:13 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: terilyn
So he admits it's wrong and does it again? Double not cool.

You have a link to that post? I'm still looking for it.

604 posted on 08/05/2002 4:04:40 PM PDT by uglybiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
"Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican" -- Reagans Law

Do de term RINO ring a bell wit' you?

605 posted on 08/05/2002 4:05:07 PM PDT by Beenliedto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Robinson
What I find laughable is the fact they (registered, KFP, EV, rdf, rowdee, etc...the people who are posting AFer type material at LP, and also trashing John rob when he posts there) outted themsleves as to the ease of their ability to be decieved.

RedBloodedAmerican has accused me of posting "AFer type" material at LP. I deny this lie. He also accused me of trashing you when you post there. As you know, this is also a lie.

It's liars like RedBloodedAmerican who have had a negative impact on Free Republic.

606 posted on 08/05/2002 4:11:57 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker; oldvike; Registered
oldvike reposted it on this thread on post #537.

I'm not going to post a link to the thread over at LP simply because that would be doing the equivalent here of what Registered did.
607 posted on 08/05/2002 4:13:39 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Read the entire thing, dearie.

Look, your inability to admit error doesn't interest me, dearie. I'm not going to hang around and play "let's pretend" with you. Your errors were clear, I pointed them out, end of story. Have a pleasant evening.

608 posted on 08/05/2002 4:18:33 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
You'll notice Satadru didn't include a link to the article in question, and instead took an excerpt out of context. Here's another excerpt which will expose why he/she didn't post a link for you:

Bush's policy barred the use of federal grants for research on stem cells taken from embryos after Aug. 9, 2001. Bush said the decision was based on his moral opposition to destroying additional embryos for research purposes.

But that restriction does not apply to research on stem cells obtained from fetuses, according to officials at the National Institutes of Health. Such work falls under less-restrictive Clinton-era rules, which Bush never revised...

...White House officials said Bush left the Clinton guidelines for fetal-derived cells in place because Congress passed a law in 1993 that made it illegal for presidents to ban funding for such research.

Link to full article

609 posted on 08/05/2002 4:19:03 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
You da bomb!

Thanks for that excerpt and the link.
610 posted on 08/05/2002 4:20:46 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: terilyn
I was going by your post #562: "So he admits it's wrong and does it again? Double not cool."

You're saying he repeated the act that got him a 'time out' form FR?

What am I missing?

611 posted on 08/05/2002 4:23:41 PM PDT by uglybiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
Then let me help you. It does seem that Keyesters have this problem with reading comprehension. I guess that makes sense, else they would wake up to Keyes and flee.

Here we go. I said earlier in this thread:

And what a laugher it was to have him banned over a link from their leaders website (Keyes - "Strike The root")
And you say I am saying "Strike The Root is Keyes' website"

Okay, now lets go through this, shall we? Ready? The "link from" refers to "Strike The Root". "Their leaders..." refers to Keyes and his followers. It is NOT saying STR is Keyes' website..

If an article on FR was posted that was from, say, LibertyPost, would that be saying LibertyPost is Jim Robs site? No.

Do you see in the blockquote above wherre I said

"....over a link from their leaders website (Keyes - "Strike The root")

Now would you please explain to me and others reading this how you comprehend that I have said this "Strike The root" is Keyes website? I said it is a "link from" Keyes' website.

Does this help? Are you still having trouble with this one?

612 posted on 08/05/2002 4:29:44 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: Satadru; Republican Wildcat
Oops. See above. Darn.
613 posted on 08/05/2002 4:30:19 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
dirtboy, I basically agree with your sentiments. However, posts like #578 make it rather difficult to achieve the goals of civility you have outlined.
614 posted on 08/05/2002 4:41:38 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
You are only propping up stupid comments like this one from the article:

White House officials said Bush left the Clinton guidelines for fetal-derived cells in place because Congress passed a law in 1993 that made it illegal for presidents to ban funding for such research.

No such laws exist.

615 posted on 08/05/2002 4:59:49 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
No such laws exist. The White House has been lying about that.
616 posted on 08/05/2002 5:01:20 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies]

To: EternalLife
Oh and not just that, he said that the Republicans in the House were trying to balance the budget on the backs of the poor. What a socialist scumbag!
617 posted on 08/05/2002 5:03:04 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Gosh, you're so right. I wish I too was a "True Conservative" and posted such fine comments as this on FR (from a non-AFer site, I am sure):
11. To: Jolly Rodgers (#7)

You would have to be pretty desparate to stoop to praying for bush.
LOL! As long as you don't stoop to paying for bush.
;-P

Keyes For President posted on 2002-08-04 22:12:39

Yes you are quite right. It is people like me that are wrong with FR. That is, if the people like you who want to drive FR - and conservatism - into the ground remain. Would you like to re-ping John Rob to this post, or shall I?

And you call *me* a liar? LOL!!!

618 posted on 08/05/2002 5:03:05 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
No you try reading one more time. Bush has approved using taxpayer's money to do research using stem cells from fetuses obtained from abortion. That is in the first paragraph.
619 posted on 08/05/2002 5:05:39 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
I bet they don't. The President can just swoop in and change the ruling of an independent agency? No, he cannot.

I understand you are upset with me for exposing your attempt at dishonesty, but thems the breaks.

620 posted on 08/05/2002 5:06:22 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 921-932 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson