Posted on 08/04/2002 10:48:54 PM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:56:04 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
That's absurd. The child has two parents. The mom engaged voluntarily in the act which brought about THEIR child. If she's so selfish she doesn't want it, so be it. Then deliver it and give it to the father to raise. No one (including the mom) should have the right to murder someone's (the father's) child.
Sarah, Sarah. How cold and cruel and heartless you are. The lady (well, not the best word) engaged willingly in the act which brought about this life. That life is the doing of two people, the mother and father. The baby is as much the father's as it is the mother's. If this woman is so selfish as to murder her child, and the man wants to raise it, then save a life (and it's wonderful potential in this world) and let the man raise it. You rely on some immoral and disgusting law for your argument. A real woman, a real mother, a real person, would allow that baby to live and to grow and to be loved by the father. This woman is a selfish disgrace to humanity.
It should go to the Supreme Court. A woman should not have the right to murder the child of a man who wants to love and care for that child.
The judge is standing up for moral right. He should be lauded. Hide, Sarah, in the perverse immoral law you so cherish. Certainly, that law is more important to you than the life of this child and the love of the father. What does that say about you?
How could anyone not have regrets after having murdered ones child?
I know about cases of mother's death following "legal safe abortion", about cases of infertility and about cases of woman becoming psychotic. Also there is a statistically significant increase of breast cancer.
When they start to care about God's beautiful creations on this Earth.
No. It should read: Father Keeps Mother from Murdering Their Child
John Stachokus says he is willing to take full or partial custody of the child and claims in his lawsuit that Ms. Meyers is being pressured by her mother to have the procedure.
The pressure by the mother may indicate that the woman is not making a free choice and that the man's "rights" might have nothing to do with his injunction.
Children play with matches, I alone bear the risk of my child burning down my house, therefore I have the right to abandon my child in the dead of winter.
You should see what it does to the baby though.
I have AS too. Have you tried Remicade or Enbrel yet? They've done wonders for me. You also might want to check out the Mass Eye and Ear website if you have problems with chronic iritis. Chronic inflammation or chronic treatment with steroids can lead to permanent vision loss. I almost lost sight in one eye from a misdiagnosis. Most ophthalmologists don't want to tackle iritis cases associated with underlying autoimmune diseases.
Exactly.
I used to do a prayer vigil in front of Planned Infanticide in Brookline pretty regularly. On Saturdays it seemed that about half of the girls were literally being pulled in by their mothers.
Imagine the 18 year old girl who has to live with the fact that she just killed her baby and the fact that her mother was so "happy" with giving birth to her that her mother wants her to kill her baby. God help us.
Let me guess. Were the other half were pulled in by school guidance counselors without mom's knowledge ?
Yeah, safe for the mother. Which is nice if you don't mind the fact that half of the abortionist's patients never leave the clinic alive.
They didn't say.
Everyone should do a vigil at least once in their lives. You'd be amazed at the stuff that is never shown on TV. One thing that isn't shown is the handful of pro-abortion freaks that usually shows up. And "freaks" is being kind.
They're the black leather, purple hair crowd. Usually they swear or play death-metal full blast on their boom boxes. Taking a stand for Satan I guess.
The freakiest of them all though were the Satanists at a pro-life march in Boston. There were around 15 of them. They all looked like they hadn't bathed in a week. Same black outfits, but these guys carried signs like (I'm not making this up) "Kill Jesus," "Eat babies," and other obscenities. Another group was waving around a 20 foot inflatable penis in front of a group of nuns. I think they were the "pro-choice" gang from the local taxpayer subsidized "art" school. Funny how that stuff never makes the papers though. It would make for great TV.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.