Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
At least they are refering this kid as a "baby" instead of a "fetus."

When are they going to address the aspect of DNA of the baby being different, thereby proving that it is NOT just more of the body of the woman?

5 posted on 08/04/2002 11:05:34 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nightdriver
>>...When are they going to address the aspect of DNA of the baby being different, thereby proving that it is NOT just more of the body of the woman?...<<

Right on!

Instead of fighting over when the exact moment of "life" occurs (something that probably never will be determined), we should focus on the moment the baby's DNA is different from the mother thus making it a unique individual.

Our laws say if you kill yourself it's suicide, kill another seperate individual it's murder.

12 posted on 08/05/2002 2:31:47 AM PDT by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nightdriver
At least they are refering this kid as a "baby" instead of a "fetus."

That's because it's the Washington Times. Their editorial position is unapologetically pro-life.

21 posted on 08/05/2002 6:02:54 AM PDT by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nightdriver
When are they going to address the aspect of DNA of the baby being different, thereby proving that it is NOT just more of the body of the woman?

When they start to care about God's beautiful creations on this Earth.

48 posted on 08/05/2002 8:00:25 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson