Skip to comments.
Tale Of Two White Houses [BUSH-KNEW!]
CBSNEWS ^
| Monday, August 5, 2002
Posted on 08/05/2002 6:02:59 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: okiedust
Which one do you think is hanging out there ready to fall, like ripe fruit, (if any).This smacks of distraction. I see trouble for Clinton & the gang on the Enron front.
To: TADSLOS
Re: #40 -- nuff said.
To: okiedust
"Bush Knew(and WE told him)" This is exactly what the Clintonistas are trying to spin. However, this means that Clinton knew - and did nothing, knowing that he could dump the problem (sans solution) on Bush come Jan. 20, 2001 - which he did. I repeat: Clinton knew - and did nothing. You wanted a legacy, Bubba, there it is.
To: JohnHuang2; All
44
posted on
08/05/2002 7:45:47 AM PDT
by
backhoe
To: JohnHuang2
Possible the Clinton administration could have had done a better job in the hand off to the Bush administration if they didn't block the normal transistion team until after the recounts ?
To: JohnHuang2
Unfortunately the BJ administration was too busy with the critical job of getting Elian back to Castro and jacking into a sink so there was no time left for Al Quaeda! Perhaps Chelsea had a plan worked into her Middle East peace plan??? Only an idiot like a Time mag would believe these horse hockey pucks! Smells like a Pewlitzer??
Pray for GW and the Truth
46
posted on
08/05/2002 7:57:41 AM PDT
by
bray
To: gaspar
To: JohnHuang2
Freepers isn't it time to gather outside of our local news stations with posters and bull horns, furious over their lame attempts to blame Bush for Clinton's nightmare?
This Socialist media needs to be brought down, and no one will do it if we don't. I'm so sick of this sitting around and just complaining about and acknowledging this mess and yet doing nothing about it.
We need to be much more activist in my opinion, I miss the street corner rally's of 2000. I want to get nose to nose with this scum and tell them to BEAT IT.
To: JohnHuang2
Let's see, we have:
A new administration that comes into power under a cloud of alleged electoral fraud ...
Led by a President who is accused of being weak-minded and an international neophyte ...
Being handed a military plan designed to eliminate a threat that was created under the previous administration, which was of the opposing party
Sound familiar. No the year isn't 2001 ... it's 1961. The target wasn't bin Laden, it was Castro and the place wasn't Afghanistan, it was the Bay of Pigs.
Funny how the Dems and Libs ALWAYS try to blame Ike for Kennedy failing to properly review and consider the BoP plan before giving the "execute" order. But now that the shoe is on the other foot, it's "National security was at stake, Bush should have charged in where angels feared to tred!"
To: tanknetter
Re: #49 -- Superb point. Kudos.
To: JohnHuang2
This pathetic Clinton alibi is a BIG LIE.Sorry if someone else mentions this, as I am just reading this disgusting piece.
The press, as usual, receive the clintonian talking points and into print it goes with nary a thought to research or context.
My God! Does the media not remember the election disaster and President Bush being denied a normal transition???
Can you imagine for a moment that President Bush took office and immediately began a campaign to eliminate Al Qaeda? I'll bet that the previous "administration" would have slyly undermined his efforts saying if Bush's actions were necessary they would have done under x42.
As it is, President Bush did take the threat seriously----very seriously indeed. The record is clear and the handmaidens of clinton in the press will not succeed in changing the facts no matter how they spin.
To: JohnHuang2
The counter campaign should be "Clinton Knew" --
52
posted on
08/05/2002 8:56:52 AM PDT
by
Woodkirk
To: cyncooper
If there had been a concrete plan, as alleged by Clinton cronies and TIME, we would have heard about it before now, don't you think?
Like, we'd have heard about it on 9/12?
This is a concerted effort to rebuild Clinton's plummeting ratings; hell, more Americans blame him for the corporate scandals than Bush.
53
posted on
08/05/2002 9:06:02 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: JohnHuang2
Perhaps Enron, but I think not. This is so much more serious than a "business scandal" which is just too complicated to explain to the public. Or so we have heard. Perhaps they left a plan being such intelligent and insightful people. Here is my idea for a cartoon on the subject:
Panel one shows a nicely suited and tied Sandy Berger stating of course we left them a plan to deal with Al Qaeda. Panel two shows a Whitehouse janitor cleaning up the West Wing on innauguration day, and among the graffiti, pizza boxes and cut phone lines is a dirty napkin crumpled with the words on it, "probably should get Al Qaeda."
Caption should be. Clinton administration leaves detailed plan to attack al Qaeda.
regards
54
posted on
08/05/2002 9:08:31 AM PDT
by
okiedust
To: okiedust
Re: #54 - lol! Excellent toon idea
To: sinkspur
This is a concerted effort to rebuild Clinton's plummeting ratings;Agreed. And I hold the media just as responsible as clinton for propogating the Big Lie, just as they did during his reign.
To: JohnHuang2
Read this John.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/727988/posts
We need to counter the attacks by the LIBERAL press on this President. I'm banking that Americans as a whole, are a hell of a lot smarter than the press and LIBS would have us all think.
This is the epitomy of anti-American, IMHO. In that they are trying to brainwash us all for the sake of ONE political party, the Democrats. It's all about winning elections. At any cost, at any price. Disgusting!!
To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Thanks for the link, friend, and Amen to everything you said.
To: cyncooper
Re: #51 -- very well said.
To: cyncooper
I agree with all of what you said in your post #51.
But one point is rarely talked about, yet of the utmost importance.
We both stated on the day of transition, that Clinton was the first president EVER that we had seen try to HOG the day on innaguration day. The reason we don't see that type of behavior is for NATIONAL SECURITY REASONS. You do NOT want to diminish the INCOMING President. You want a SMOOTH transition of power. It sends the wrong messages to our enemies,.and has a ripple effect.
What we witnessed by Gore during the election (how many times to you need to lose? He was as incapable of putting our form of governing and our nation above his OWN ego! It was sickening.. and he truly is the epitomy of a sore loser).. Then we had the day that power was to transfer. IF you never knew America, and you did not know who won the election, you wouldn't have been able to tell from watching tv who the INCOMING President was.
I've NEVER seen so much of an outgoing President in my life. Usually, they get on the helicopter..and that is that. It is over.. the day is the new Presidents. A SMOOTH TRANSITION TAKES PLACE.
But not with that traitor!!
I've never been so disgusted in my life. Both of us will never forget that day,..and we have friends who heard us cry that we were going to pay economically, and with our security for having had Clinton as President..and even more so after such a long tenure!!
SADLY.. now our friends know. It is one of those times, I wish to God we could NOT say we told ya so. But we truly had been telling people that Clinton was dangerous to all of us since 1993. We actually tried to warn people about him before the 1992 election based on what we could garner from his campaigns and elections in Arkansas. So many lies.. but no one listened.
Anyway.. I'll be dead before I'll sit back and passively allow this kind of LYING and treasonous behavior to go unchecked. We should be rounding up a TON of the Clinton admin and putting them on Trial for treason!! I wonder how many Agents died because that admin leaked information on purpose to appease the press?? How many soldiers??
Sickening!
The ADULTS have returned..and we thank GOD for that in this house!! For all our country, and especially for our military and agents in the field!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson