Replies

What i found to be particularly disturbing was Garry Winnick spending 30 million to renovate the palatial mansion he bought in Cali for 90 million dollars ....yet at the same time his ex-employees are asking for 32 million in back pay. I really doubt he needed to redecorate his palace. If he had any iota of integrity he would have used that money to at the very least take care of the salary needs of his ex-employees. It is not as if he needs the money anyway (relatively speaking).

And no, i am not against wealth. I actually love it since it is very condusive to life (not the only thing but it goes very very far). What i am against is people like Garry fleecing people left right and center, and then going along with a 30 million dollar redecoration (as if a palace ...and in essence it is a palace) needs it, when his ex-employees are asking for 32 mil. It seems to me to be like a smack to the face for those poor souls! He seems to be mocking them ....telling them implicitly that he would rather spend that money on redecorating something that does not need decoration than give it to them for the sustainace of themselves and their families. His ex-employees who he fleeced out of a job, income and future!