Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BG Paul W Tibbets, USAF, Ret: "That's their tough luck for being there."
The UK Guardian ^ | Tuesday August 6, 2002 | Studs Terkel

Posted on 08/06/2002 9:02:04 AM PDT by SlickWillard


Today is Hiroshima Day, the anniversary of the first use of a bomb so powerful that it would come to threaten the existence of the human race. Only two such devices have ever been used, but now, a decade after the end of the cold war, the world faces new dangers of nuclear attack - from India, Pakistan, Iraq, al-Qaida, and even the US. Launching a special investigation into nuclear weapons, Paul Tibbets, the man who piloted the Enola Gay on its mission to Japan, tells Studs Terkel why he has no regrets - and why he wouldn't hesitate to use it again

Studs Terkel

Tuesday August 6, 2002

Studs Terkel: We're seated here, two old gaffers. Me and Paul Tibbets, 89 years old, brigadier-general retired, in his home town of Columbus, Ohio, where has lived for many years.

Paul Tibbets: Hey, you've got to correct that. I'm only 87. You said 89.

ST: I know. See, I'm 90. So I got you beat by three years. Now we've had a nice lunch, you and I and your companion. I noticed as we sat in that restaurant, people passed by. They didn't know who you were. But once upon a time, you flew a plane called the Enola Gay over the city of Hiroshima, in Japan, on a Sunday morning - August 6 1945 - and a bomb fell. It was the atomic bomb, the first ever. And that particular moment changed the whole world around. You were the pilot of that plane.

PT: Yes, I was the pilot.

ST: And the Enola Gay was named after...

PT: My mother. She was Enola Gay Haggard before she married my dad, and my dad never supported me with the flying - he hated airplanes and motorcycles. When I told them I was going to leave college and go fly planes in the army air corps, my dad said, "Well, I've sent you through school, bought you automobiles, given you money to run around with the girls, but from here on, you're on your own. If you want to go kill yourself, go ahead, I don't give a damn." Then Mom just quietly said, "Paul, if you want to go fly airplanes, you're going to be all right." And that was that.

ST: Where was that?

PT: Well, that was Miami, Florida. My dad had been in the real estate business down there for years, and at that time he was retired. And I was going to school at Gaysville, Florida, but I had to leave after two years and go to Cincinnati because Florida had no medical school.

ST: You were thinking of being a doctor?

PT: I didn't think that, my father thought it. He said, "You're going to be a doctor," and I just nodded my head and that was it. And I started out that way; but about a year before, I was able to get into an airplane, fly it - I soloed - and I knew then that I had to go fly airplanes.

ST: Now by 1944 you were a pilot - a test pilot on the programme to develop the B-29 bomber. When did you get word that you had a special assignment?

PT: One day [in September 1944] I'm running a test on a B-29, I land, a man meets me. He says he just got a call from General Uzal Ent [commander of the second air force] at Colorado Springs, he wants me in his office the next morning at nine o'clock. He said, "Bring your clothing - your B4 bag - because you're not coming back." Well, I didn't know what it was and didn't pay any attention to it - it was just another assignment.

I got to Colorado Springs the next morning perfectly on time. A man named Lansdale met me, walked me to General Ent's office and closed the door behind me. With him was a man wearing a blue suit, a US Navy captain - that was William Parsons, who flew with me to Hiroshima - and Dr Norman Ramsey, Columbia University professor in nuclear physics. And Norman said: "OK, we've got what we call the Manhattan Project. What we're doing is trying to develop an atomic bomb. We've gotten to the point now where we can't go much further till we have airplanes to work with."

He gave me an explanation which probably lasted 45, 50 minutes, and they left. General Ent looked at me and said, "The other day, General Arnold [commander general of the army air corps] offered me three names." Both of the others were full colonels; I was lieutenant-colonel. He said that when General Arnold asked which of them could do this atomic weapons deal, he replied without hesitation, "Paul Tibbets is the man to do it." I said, "Well, thank you, sir." Then he laid out what was going on and it was up to me now to put together an organisation and train them to drop atomic weapons on both Europe and the Pacific - Tokyo.

ST: Interesting that they would have dropped it on Europe as well. We didn't know that.

PT: My edict was as clear as could be. Drop simultaneously in Europe and the Pacific because of the secrecy problem - you couldn't drop it in one part of the world without dropping it in the other. And so he said, "I don't know what to tell you, but I know you happen to have B-29s to start with. I've got a squadron in training in Nebraska - they have the best record so far of anybody we've got. I want you to go visit them, look at them, talk to them, do whatever you want. If they don't suit you, we'll get you some more." He said: "There's nobody could tell you what you have to do because nobody knows. If we can do anything to help you, ask me." I said thank you very much. He said, "Paul, be careful how you treat this responsibility, because if you're successful you'll probably be called a hero. And if you're unsuccessful, you might wind up in prison."

ST: Did you know the power of an atomic bomb? Were you told about that?

PT: No, I didn't know anything at that time. But I knew how to put an organisation together. He said, "Go take a look at the bases, and call me back and tell me which one you want." I wanted to get back to Grand Island Nebraska, that's where my wife and two kids were, where my laundry was done and all that stuff. But I thought, "Well, I'll go to Wendover [army airfield, in Utah] first and see what they've got." As I came in over the hills I saw it was a beautiful spot. It had been a final staging place for units that were going through combat crew training, and the guys ahead of me were the last P-47 fighter outfit. This lieutenant-colonel in charge said, "We've just been advised to stop here and I don't know what you want to do... but if it has anything to do with this base it's the most perfect base I've ever been on. You've got full machine shops, everybody's qualified, they know what they want to do. It's a good place."

ST: And now you chose your own crew.

PT: Well, I had mentally done it before that. I knew right away I was going to get Tom Ferebee [the Enola Gay's bombardier] and Theodore "Dutch" van Kirk [navigator] and Wyatt Duzenbury [flight engineer].

ST: Guys you had flown with in Europe?

PT: Yeah.

ST: And now you're training. And you're also talking to physicists like Robert Oppenheimer [senior scientist on the Manhattan project].

PT: I think I went to Los Alamos [the Manhattan project HQ] three times, and each time I got to see Dr Oppenheimer working in his own environment. Later, thinking about it, here's a young man, a brilliant person. And he's a chain smoker and he drinks cocktails. And he hates fat men. And General Leslie Groves [the general in charge of the Manhattan project], he's a fat man, and he hates people who smoke and drink. The two of them are the first, original odd couple.

ST: They had a feud, Groves and Oppenheimer?

PT: Yeah, but neither one of them showed it. Each one of them had a job to do.

ST: Did Oppenheimer tell you about the destructive nature of the bomb?

PT: No.

ST: How did you know about that?

PT: From Dr Ramsey. He said the only thing we can tell you about it is, it's going to explode with the force of 20,000 tons of TNT. I'd never seen 1lb of TNT blow up. I'd never heard of anybody who'd seen 100lbs of TNT blow up. All I felt was that this was gonna be one hell of a big bang.

ST: Twenty thousand tons - that's equivalent to how many planes full of bombs?

PT: Well, I think the two bombs that we used [at Hiroshima and Nagasaki] had more power than all the bombs the air force had used during the war on Europe.

ST: So Ramsey told you about the possibilities.

PT: Even though it was still theory, whatever those guys told me, that's what happened. So I was ready to say I wanted to go to war, but I wanted to ask Oppenheimer how to get away from the bomb after we dropped it. I told him that when we had dropped bombs in Europe and North Africa, we'd flown straight ahead after dropping them - which is also the trajectory of the bomb. But what should we do this time? He said, "You can't fly straight ahead because you'd be right over the top when it blows up and nobody would ever know you were there." He said I had to turn tangent to the expanding shockwave. I said, "Well, I've had some trigonometry, some physics. What is tangency in this case?" He said it was 159 degrees in either direction. "Turn 159 degrees as fast as you can and you'll be able to put yourself the greatest distance from where the bomb exploded."

ST: How many seconds did you have to make that turn?

PT: I had dropped enough practice bombs to realise that the charges would blow around 1,500ft in the air, so I would have 40 to 42 seconds to turn 159 degrees. I went back to Wendover as quick as I could and took the airplane up. I got myself to 25,000ft, and I practised turning, steeper, steeper, steeper and I got it where I could pull it round in 40 seconds. The tail was shaking dramatically and I was afraid of it breaking off, but I didn't quit. That was my goal. And I practised and practised until, without even thinking about it, I could do it in between 40 and 42, all the time. So, when that day came...

ST: You got the go-ahead on August 5.

PT: Yeah. We were in Tinian [the US island base in the Pacific] at the time we got the OK. They had sent this Norwegian to the weather station out on Guam [the US's westernmost territory] and I had a copy of his report. We said that, based on his forecast, the sixth day of August would be the best day that we could get over Honshu [the island on which Hiroshima stands]. So we did everything that had to be done to get the crews ready to go: airplane loaded, crews briefed, all of the things checked that you have to check before you can fly over enemy territory.

General Groves had a brigadier-general who was connected back to Washington DC by a special teletype machine. He stayed close to that thing all the time, notifying people back there, all by code, that we were preparing these airplanes to go any time after midnight on the sixth. And that's the way it worked out. We were ready to go at about four o'clock in the afternoon on the fifth and we got word from the president that we were free to go: "Use 'em as you wish." They give you a time you're supposed to drop your bomb on target and that was 9.15 in the morning , but that was Tinian time, one hour later than Japanese time. I told Dutch, "You figure it out what time we have to start after midnight to be over the target at 9am."

ST: That'd be Sunday morning.

PT: Well, we got going down the runway at right about 2.15am and we took off, we met our rendezvous guys, we made our flight up to what we call the initial point, that would be a geographic position that you could not mistake. Well, of course we had the best one in the world with the rivers and bridges and that big shrine. There was no mistaking what it was.

ST: So you had to have the right navigator to get it on the button.

PT: The airplane has a bomb sight connected to the autopilot and the bombardier puts figures in there for where he wants to be when he drops the weapon, and that's transmitted to the airplane. We always took into account what would happen if we had a failure and the bomb bay doors didn't open: we had a manual release put in each airplane so it was right down by the bombardier and he could pull on that. And the guys in the airplanes that followed us to drop the instruments needed to know when it was going to go. We were told not to use the radio, but, hell, I had to. I told them I would say, "One minute out," "Thirty seconds out," "Twenty seconds" and "Ten" and then I'd count, "Nine, eight, seven, six, five, four seconds", which would give them a time to drop their cargo. They knew what was going on because they knew where we were. And that's exactly the way it worked, it was absolutely perfect.

After we got the airplanes in formation I crawled into the tunnel and went back to tell the men, I said, "You know what we're doing today?" They said, "Well, yeah, we're going on a bombing mission." I said, "Yeah, we're going on a bombing mission, but it's a little bit special." My tailgunner, Bob Caron, was pretty alert. He said, "Colonel, we wouldn't be playing with atoms today, would we?" I said, "Bob, you've got it just exactly right." So I went back up in the front end and I told the navigator, bombardier, flight engineer, in turn. I said, "OK, this is an atom bomb we're dropping." They listened intently but I didn't see any change in their faces or anything else. Those guys were no idiots. We'd been fiddling round with the most peculiar-shaped things we'd ever seen.

So we're coming down. We get to that point where I say "one second" and by the time I'd got that second out of my mouth the airplane had lurched, because 10,000lbs had come out of the front. I'm in this turn now, tight as I can get it, that helps me hold my altitude and helps me hold my airspeed and everything else all the way round. When I level out, the nose is a little bit high and as I look up there the whole sky is lit up in the prettiest blues and pinks I've ever seen in my life. It was just great.

I tell people I tasted it. "Well," they say, "what do you mean?" When I was a child, if you had a cavity in your tooth the dentist put some mixture of some cotton or whatever it was and lead into your teeth and pounded them in with a hammer. I learned that if I had a spoon of ice-cream and touched one of those teeth I got this electrolysis and I got the taste of lead out of it. And I knew right away what it was.

OK, we're all going. We had been briefed to stay off the radios: "Don't say a damn word, what we do is we make this turn, we're going to get out of here as fast as we can." I want to get out over the sea of Japan because I know they can't find me over there. With that done we're home free. Then Tom Ferebee has to fill out his bombardier's report and Dutch, the navigator, has to fill out a log. Tom is working on his log and says, "Dutch, what time were we over the target?" And Dutch says, "Nine-fifteen plus 15 seconds." Ferebee says: "What lousy navigating. Fifteen seconds off!"

ST: Did you hear an explosion?

PT: Oh yeah. The shockwave was coming up at us after we turned. And the tailgunner said, "Here it comes." About the time he said that, we got this kick in the ass. I had accelerometers installed in all airplanes to record the magnitude of the bomb. It hit us with two and a half G. Next day, when we got figures from the scientists on what they had learned from all the things, they said, "When that bomb exploded, your airplane was 10 and half miles away from it."

ST: Did you see that mushroom cloud?

PT: You see all kinds of mushroom clouds, but they were made with different types of bombs. The Hiroshima bomb did not make a mushroom. It was what I call a stringer. It just came up. It was black as hell, and it had light and colours and white in it and grey colour in it and the top was like a folded-up Christmas tree.

ST: Do you have any idea what happened down below?

PT: Pandemonium! I think it's best stated by one of the historians, who said: "In one micro-second, the city of Hiroshima didn't exist."

ST: You came back, and you visited President Truman.

PT: We're talking 1948 now. I'm back in the Pentagon and I get notice from the chief of staff, Carl Spaatz, the first chief of staff of the air force. When we got to General Spaatz's office, General Doolittle was there, and a colonel named Dave Shillen. Spaatz said, "Gentlemen, I just got word from the president he wants us to go over to his office immediately." On the way over, Doolittle and Spaatz were doing some talking; I wasn't saying very much. When we got out of the car we were escorted right quick to the Oval Office. There was a black man there who always took care of Truman's needs and he said, "General Spaatz, will you please be facing the desk?" And now, facing the desk, Spaatz is on the right, Doolittle and Shillen. Of course, militarily speaking, that's the correct order: because Spaatz is senior, Doolittle has to sit to his left.

Then I was taken by this man and put in the chair that was right beside the president's desk, beside his left hand. Anyway, we got a cup of coffee and we got most of it consumed when Truman walked in and everybody stood on their feet. He said, "Sit down, please," and he had a big smile on his face and he said, "General Spaatz, I want to congratulate you on being first chief of the air force," because it was no longer the air corps. Spaatz said, "Thank you, sir, it's a great honour and I appreciate it." And he said to Doolittle: "That was a magnificent thing you pulled flying off of that carrier," and Doolittle said, "All in a day's work, Mr President." And he looked at Dave Shillen and said, "Colonel Shillen, I want to congratulate you on having the foresight to recognise the potential in aerial refuelling. We're gonna need it bad some day." And he said thank you very much.

Then he looked at me for 10 seconds and he didn't say anything. And when he finally did, he said, "What do you think?" I said, "Mr President, I think I did what I was told." He slapped his hand on the table and said: "You're damn right you did, and I'm the guy who sent you. If anybody gives you a hard time about it, refer them to me."

ST: Anybody ever give you a hard time?

PT: Nobody gave me a hard time.

ST: Do you ever have any second thoughts about the bomb?

PT: Second thoughts? No. Studs, look. Number one, I got into the air corps to defend the United States to the best of my ability. That's what I believe in and that's what I work for. Number two, I'd had so much experience with airplanes... I'd had jobs where there was no particular direction about how you do it and then of course I put this thing together with my own thoughts on how it should be because when I got the directive I was to be self-supporting at all times.

On the way to the target I was thinking: I can't think of any mistakes I've made. Maybe I did make a mistake: maybe I was too damned assured. At 29 years of age I was so shot in the ass with confidence I didn't think there was anything I couldn't do. Of course, that applied to airplanes and people. So, no, I had no problem with it. I knew we did the right thing because when I knew we'd be doing that I thought, yes, we're going to kill a lot of people, but by God we're going to save a lot of lives. We won't have to invade [Japan].

ST: Why did they drop the second one, the Bockscar [bomb] on Nagasaki?

PT: Unknown to anybody else - I knew it, but nobody else knew - there was a third one. See, the first bomb went off and they didn't hear anything out of the Japanese for two or three days. The second bomb was dropped and again they were silent for another couple of days. Then I got a phone call from General Curtis LeMay [chief of staff of the strategic air forces in the Pacific]. He said, "You got another one of those damn things?" I said, "Yessir." He said, "Where is it?" I said, "Over in Utah." He said, "Get it out here. You and your crew are going to fly it." I said, "Yessir." I sent word back and the crew loaded it on an airplane and we headed back to bring it right on out to Trinian and when they got it to California debarkation point, the war was over.

ST: What did General LeMay have in mind with the third one?

PT: Nobody knows.

ST: One big question. Since September 11, what are your thoughts? People talk about nukes, the hydrogen bomb.

PT: Let's put it this way. I don't know any more about these terrorists than you do, I know nothing. When they bombed the Trade Centre I couldn't believe what was going on. We've fought many enemies at different times. But we knew who they were and where they were. These people, we don't know who they are or where they are. That's the point that bothers me. Because they're gonna strike again, I'll put money on it. And it's going to be damned dramatic. But they're gonna do it in their own sweet time. We've got to get into a position where we can kill the bastards. None of this business of taking them to court, the hell with that. I wouldn't waste five seconds on them.

ST: What about the bomb? Einstein said the world has changed since the atom was split.

PT: That's right. It has changed.

ST: And Oppenheimer knew that.

PT: Oppenheimer is dead. He did something for the world and people don't understand. And it is a free world.

ST: One last thing, when you hear people say, "Let's nuke 'em," "Let's nuke these people," what do you think?

PT: Oh, I wouldn't hesitate if I had the choice. I'd wipe 'em out. You're gonna kill innocent people at the same time, but we've never fought a damn war anywhere in the world where they didn't kill innocent people. If the newspapers would just cut out the shit: "You've killed so many civilians." That's their tough luck for being there.

ST: By the way, I forgot to say Enola Gay was originally called number 82. How did your mother feel about having her name on it?

PT: Well, I can only tell you what my dad said. My mother never changed her expression very much about anything, whether it was serious or light, but when she'd get tickled, her stomach would jiggle. My dad said to me that when the telephone in Miami rang, my mother was quiet first. Then, when it was announced on the radio, he said: "You should have seen the old gal's belly jiggle on that one."

· Further information on the Enola Gay can be found at www.theenolagay.com.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
To: rightwing2
"...General Tibbets doesn't demonstrate much regard for the lives of the 140,000...who lost their lives as the result of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki".

That's right, and he doesn't 'HAVE TO' either.

41 posted on 08/06/2002 10:50:58 AM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bruoz
I wasn't sure about exactly how it was named, but I knew the name 1) sounded like that, and 2) it was a play on "boxcar."
42 posted on 08/06/2002 10:52:34 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SlickWillard
Moral of the story... Americans are amongst the kindest, gentlest people on earth. They are loathe to get involved in conflicts, and very slow to react. America, you might say, is something of a well armed wimp... except... and this is a big exception....If you push them, really push them, history has shown that they are capable of unleashing destruction heretofore only beknownst by Creation. The power of the gods with the fury of Demons.

To put it succinctly, don't F*CK with the USA.

43 posted on 08/06/2002 10:54:24 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlickWillard
If men commit acts of barbarism, then run and hide behind the skirts of women and children, they should not be surprised to see similar acts of barbarism visited upon same.

Excellent point.

44 posted on 08/06/2002 10:54:57 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rond
I take it then, that your position is that the people on United Airlines Flight 93 who fought back against the terrorists were morally wrong because other passengers were killed.
45 posted on 08/06/2002 10:55:41 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SlickWillard
Slick: I did go back and re-read the quote, and here it is, in its entirety:

"Oh, I wouldn't hesitate (to drop an atomic bomb) if I had the choice. I'd wipe 'em out. You're gonna kill innocent people at the same time, but we've never fought a damn war anywhere in the world where they didn't kill innocent people. If the newspapers would just cut out the shit: 'You've killed so many civilians.' That's their tough luck for being there."

He is talking about civilians, not the "recent spate of news stories concerning possible civilian deaths in Afghanistan," as you put it. He is dismissing civilian deaths as too bad, so sad, as "tough luck."

I concur with you on the "moral approach" to this issue. We should not be surprised when old birds of prey come home to roost.

46 posted on 08/06/2002 10:59:59 AM PDT by rond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SlickWillard
Excellent read.
47 posted on 08/06/2002 11:04:07 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs
Remember Pearl Harbor!"

Remember Bataan!

48 posted on 08/06/2002 11:05:42 AM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs
I take it then, that your position is that the people on United Airlines Flight 93 who fought back against the terrorists were morally wrong because other passengers were killed.

That's a straw-man debating point and you should know it. Unless, of course, you are saying that some of the Flight 93 passengers were four-square opposed to the fight to regain control of the craft.

Let's get back on point, shall we? It's really quite simple. The United States dropped two atomic weapons and killed tens of thousands of civilians. Our Joint Chiefs chair and the majority of his subordinates opposed the dropping of the A bombs. So did future President Eisenhower. The latter's words seem most applicable here:

"Japan was already defeated and dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary ... I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives."

Yes, I like Ike, and not just because of the interstate highway system.

49 posted on 08/06/2002 11:05:49 AM PDT by rond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
The dropping of the atomic bombs was neither immoral or unnecessary to get Japan to surrender.

It was the right thing to do whether you approve of it or not, whether you like it or not.

50 posted on 08/06/2002 11:07:40 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs
I for one totally agree with the parallel you draw between the passengers of Flight 82 and the dropping of the bombs on Japan.

The passengers discovered the intent of the highjackers...to drive the plane into a national landmark...possibly killing thousands.

They instinctively and quickly and rightly discerned that A) The situation had been created by the murderous aggressors B) The danger to the innocent was not their fault C) The risk to the few innocents on the plane paled in comparison to the lives that were potentially at risk D) That it was their duty to risk their own lives, and the lives of those few innocents, in the hopes of saving many.

I say your analogy works, and works well.

Besides, the Japenese people themselves were hardly without guilt themselves for the war.

Later.

EV
51 posted on 08/06/2002 11:19:55 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
As ripe for surrender as you suggest they were, it took two bombs to get the message delivered - what's wrong with this picture?

Even after the bombings and the official surrender, even after our occupation forces began to arrive in Tokyo and elsewhere, the Japanese laborers were still hard at work building defensive bunkers. I've seen the photos, taken by my father-in-law when he arrived in Sasebo with a handful of Americans sent there to secure an armory. Either the Japanese were *very* slow to get the news, or they refused to accept it. Either way, they were digging in for one heck of a fight.

52 posted on 08/06/2002 11:21:16 AM PDT by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
The Japanese government had accepted defeat and was desperately searching for a way out.

And we gave it to them. We didn't invade Southeast Asia, China and expand our might into the mass of Pacific Islands. We didn't start it. But we sure as hell finished it. Come back and talk to us about morality when you've done your homework on Japanese butchery, barbarism and totalitarianism.

53 posted on 08/06/2002 11:23:14 AM PDT by ProudEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rond
>>I think Rightwing2 is spot-on with this elegant, succinct belief: the killing of innocents is always morally wrong.<<

Killing innocents is always regrettable, but not morally wrong in all cases. The evolution of Just War and morality of killing has evolved over time, and even the Conventions on war recognize that in war innocents sometimes get hurt/killed. What matters in the aim and proportional goal of the act that caused the injury/death.

>>Con Doesn't matter the place, the time, the circumstances.<<

It certainly does matter, otherwise you would prohibit our troops from shooting back if they are being fired upon by a bad guy that used civilians as a shield. In addition, you would say it is wrong to drop a bomb on a munitions factory, staffed with civilians that are being forced to work there, as this factory is making weapons that will be used to kill Americans. You would also make it immoral to attack a command and control building in a downtown location, merely because some innocents may be harmed. (In the Kosovo campaign we ran modeling and simulation studies before dropping bombs on targets in downtown Belgrade. If the civilian cost was too high, we did not attack. However, if the military gain was sufficient, it was attacked.)

One must keep in mind the military gain when contemplating an action that would result in civilian lives being lost. If by shutting down a command and control center means we make the bad guys’ fielded forces combat ineffective and his SAM batteries blind, that action is certainly acceptable in most cases.

>>It's wrong and we should not be a party to such barbarism.<<

It is wrong to deliberately target civilians as the aim and object of the attack. It is not wrong to attack military targets with proportional civilian losses--and that is an acceptable international standard.

I strongly suggest you do a little reading on the subject: Just War, by Tucker, Just and Unjust Wars, by Michael Walzer are two great books to begin your education. Once you have studied these books, and understood St Thomas Aquinas' influence on the subject, will then be able to speak knowledgably on the subject.
54 posted on 08/06/2002 11:29:01 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SlickWillard
Great article!

Thanks for posting it.

55 posted on 08/06/2002 11:29:52 AM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rond; rightwing2
If they were beaten, they were not admitting it.

Read Richard Frank's book, "Downfall" which covered that time frame. They were not READY to quit.

If Japan didn't want the horrors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they shouldn't have attacked Pearl Harbor. Their bad decision on that front.
56 posted on 08/06/2002 11:30:05 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rond
>>Is it acceptable when enemies of the United States kill civilians and dismiss those casualties as "besides the point"?<<

No, it is not acceptable, as the attacks on 9-11 prove--attacking civlians with the aim of murdering civlians is never acceptable.
57 posted on 08/06/2002 11:30:44 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KenGum4; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; rightwing2
Speaking of civilian losses!
58 posted on 08/06/2002 11:43:06 AM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ohioman; Scholastic
Who the hells side are you on? You come off as nothing but a liberal Blame-AMERICA first panty waste.

On the side of America First of course! I am now and have always been an America First conservative. However, I am also a Christian and believe in fighting just wars in a moral way. The fact is that the atomic bombings were unnecessary in addition to being immoral. Admiral Leahy called Truman's atomic bombings of Japan "a barbarous act." Are you ready to call Admiral Leahy an America Last liberal too? Gees! I am calling attention to the travesty of Hiroshima because I want to help ensure that the lesson is learned and that it never happens again. Otherwise the next Hiroshima will be on US soil.
59 posted on 08/06/2002 11:43:45 AM PDT by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rond
ME: I take it then, that your position is that the people on United Airlines Flight 93 who fought back against the terrorists were morally wrong because other passengers were killed.

That's a straw-man debating point and you should know it. Unless, of course, you are saying that some of the Flight 93 passengers were four-square opposed to the fight to regain control of the craft.

1. You were objecting to the loss of innocent lives, period. 2. Who is to say that the passengers were, in fact, unanimous? Were there any children aboard -- they couldn't give informed consent even if they'd wanted to. 3. How could they have known in advance that no one on the ground would have been killed? Anyone on the ground could not possibly have given consent. As long as we're indulging in sweeping moral condemnation of events we don't fully understand , why not toss in the people who tried maniacally to grab the plane back. It's up to them to prove what they did was moral, right?

Let's get back on point, shall we? It's really quite simple. The United States dropped two atomic weapons and killed tens of thousands of civilians.

Is your objection to the number of bombs or the number of civilians killed? We'd used more bombs in the past and killed more civilians.

Civilians are always killed during wars. We don't like it (unlike some of our opponents), but it happens. Hiroshima was a major military target that had, up to that point suffered the least war damage. We were hitting where we would inflict the most war damage. Nagasaki was less important militarily, but the primary target that day was obscured by clouds. It was the best they could do under the circumstances.

Do you prefer the Clinton approach: Blowing up a few vacant paint lockers and out-houses? It doesn't seem to have stopped Osama bin Laden and his jolly lads, and in fact may have encouraged them.

Some people have used the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to try to implicate the wartime U.S. in some sort of anti-Christian plot because those two cities had the highest concentration of Christians. There are threads right here on FR on the topic. Want to play with that notion?

In your zeal to hate the way we won the war, you forget we were fighting an a foe which at the time was the most ruthless and implacable we'd ever faced. If I had been president in 1945, I would much rather have explained to the American people why I used such a weapon to end the war and save millions of lives (on both sides, by the way), than try and explain why I had such a weapon and didn't use it.

By the way, do we get to count the Japanese civilians who weren't killed because we didn't invade, and we didn't carpet bomb their other cities, and who didn't starve to death because their military was commandeering all the food?

Our Joint Chiefs chair and the majority of his subordinates opposed the dropping of the A bombs. So did future President Eisenhower. The latter's words seem most applicable here:

"Japan was already defeated and dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary ... I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives."

Eisenhower fought the war in Europe, and was not familiar with the situation in the Pacific. As to why it was not "mandatory as a measure to save American lives," I'm curious ... how should we have won? Were we supposed to starve them out? Do you have evidence that the Japanese military, contrary to all history and experience, mysteriously planned on allowing civilians have all the food in time of war?

Were we supposed to let the Soviet Union take care of Japan? The Soviets hadn't even declared war when the first bomb was dropped.

Japan refused to surrender after the first atomic bombing. After Nagasaki, the emperor recorded a message of surrender to be played on the radio (he was precluded from appearing live by protocol), A cadre of officers mutinied and tried to steal the record so that Japan would not surrender.

Japanese school children were being taught to use sharpened sticks to kill invading Americans. Would it have been immoral to kill those kids to save the lives of American soldiers?

You are able to enjoy your moral preening at the expense of the very men who won the war and made continuing our way of life possible. Live it up.

60 posted on 08/06/2002 11:43:52 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson