Replies

The real guinea pig is the fool that won't go after infection when no other explanation exists.
A real "infection" is pretty easy to find and diagnose. There are plenty of physiological tests that can be performed to detect infection. I was under the impression that ADD/ADHD wasn't an "infection" at all, but was considered a "chemical imbalance" of some sort, thus the need to adjust brain chemicals with medication. A new one on me, to be sure.
Now, I'd go in to have an infection cleared up, but neither I nor my children will be guinea pigs for head shrinks.
Good luck with your "theory" and "research".

You're absolutely right... ADHD is considered a "chemical imbalance".

The chemical imbalance is the effect. What causes/initiated the chemical imbalance? What is different in one person over another that causes an imbalance? You have to work the equation backwards and separate cause from effect.

When they say it's a chemical imbalance that's when you call them on their diagnosis and say, "OK, model your diagnosis".

This is where the crap hits the fan because they have no model. When you ask these people for a step by step walk through of the process that causes this "chemical imbalance" they can't. They haven't got a clue. Everything that occurs in the body is a discrete mathematical/chemical equation. Every systems analyst knows you can't solve a problem without a walk-through. Things start with Step A and proceed toward End Result Z.

Since the simplest explanation is usually the correct one, which is easier to believe: 1) The child has a genetic defect, 2) the child has been poisoned, 3) the child has mutated with an undetected cancer, 4) the child has picked up one of 5000 viruses or 100,000 strains of bacterium, 5) the teacher is an overbearing jackass that has it in for your kid, or 6) hormones?

I pick 5 first followed closely by 4 if the child is young, but 6 if child is 13yrs. or older, based solely on the way the numbers are likely to break.