Posted on 08/07/2002 5:16:34 AM PDT by Jordi
Edited on 07/19/2004 2:10:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Mathieu Nouzareth and his brother Romain, founders of French online-video startup Cineticvision, are eager to hire more software writers.
Why don't they? Because 23 percent of what each employee costs them goes to the French government in taxes to pay for unemployment, retirement and health care.
(Excerpt) Read more at quote.bloomberg.com ...
Germany, State of Georgia Comparison Shows Why Europe Lags in Job Creation
Italy, Maryland Comparison Shows Why Europe Lags the U.S. in Productivity
"WE'RE BETTER THAN THE FROGS"
This says it all. I have been the most vocal proponent of PRODUCTIVITY as the MAIN economic indicator of a nation/region's health. Here 'tis again.
I have found a lot of papers on the argument but no detailed statistic , by now.
I'm a French entrepreneur as well, and my point of view is very different. First, what is called "taxes" in this article are not "taxes" but "social charges", in the sense that they don't go to the government as the article pretends, but to other organisations in charge of pensions, health insurance, etc. which include fully private for-profit insurance companies. In most cases, it is the company or the employee who choses which organism or company will be the benificiary of these charges. The fact that these points have not been mentioned in the article pretty much tells you how biased it is.
Also, this system is no more costly, actually less by my own experience, than its American counterpart. I've had many occasions to compare: in the US these "social charges" are not paid directly by the employee (this is not so true since an american company often pays directly for health insurance and sometimes other costly benefits) but since your employee must be able to invest in his pension fund, its life insurance, etc., at the end of the day these expenses must be "provisioned" in the salary paid to the employee. Which means that in France, a direct salary is lower than in America, but all the benefits and "social" expenses have already been taken on its paycheck.
The other point on the difficulties to fire someone, however, is much more valid.
``The European economies have poor incentives for job- creation because of job-protection laws and wage regulations,'' said Gary Burtless, a Brookings Institution economist who has studied the U.S. and European economic systems.
Okay, could somebody help me out here?
The scumbag Democrats' primary goal is to take the US in the direction described above.
The Brookings Institution is an arm of the scumbag Democrat Party.
So why does the Brookings Institution allow one of their economists to say the things he says above?
Is this guy toast?
Ah, so these "social charges" are optional and voluntary, and are not mandated by ze government.
Well, then this story certainly is inaccurate.
Mouahahah. Absolutely not true. Really, this article belongs to the trashcan.
Reeeaaaaaaalllly? If so, he's a moron. There are night classes everywhere on this in France and I've attended several. What kind of "source of information" is this guy?
And French entrepreneurs complain that the efforts are splintered among hundreds of different local agencies and it's very difficult to find out what aid you can qualify for.
Oh, come on! It takes TWO hours to find all the aids you can qualify for. And even if that's still too much for your poor little head, there are specialists who are here to help you, often for free. If this guy thinks this is still too difficult, I really wonder if it's such a good idea for him to become an entrepreneur.
I think I am beginning to see how France became a socialist sewer.
No offense.
Basically, it says that the Euros love their leisure time more than they like to be productive.
Some of the countries (France) has a government (ie- gun to the head) mandated 35 hour work week, and 6+ wks vacation.
Get this - their reasoning is that companies will hire more people to get the work done if the existing workers are not allowed to work longer hours. The opposite has become true - companies are opening branches in foreign countries to hire workers who actually want to work.
Why? I never said that I approved these regulations. But the content of this article is _wrong_. It's as simple as this.
Are you on drugs?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/729735/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.