Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JameRetief
Very interesting but I don't really see where there's an issue in the big picture. In the end, the same behavior causes AIDS. Whether the behavior leads to the virus triggers the end results or the behavior leads to the end results directly seems to be irrelevant to me. What am I missing?
4 posted on 08/08/2002 7:44:40 AM PDT by College Repub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: College Repub
Whether the behavior leads to the virus triggers the end results or the behavior leads to the end results directly seems to be irrelevant to me. What am I missing?

A couple of gazillion dollars wasted in trying to combat the HIV virus
7 posted on 08/08/2002 7:47:25 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: College Repub
Whether the behavior leads to the virus triggers the end results or the behavior leads to the end results directly seems to be irrelevant to me. What am I missing?

Money. We are wasting BILLIONS and BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars if HIV is not the cause of AIDS. It would take comparatively very little money to confirm or debunk the HIV theory. Tests do so have been proposed and set up, but the AIDS industry continues to stall and prevent them from occuring.

13 posted on 08/08/2002 7:58:06 AM PDT by JameRetief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: College Repub
In the end, the same behavior causes AIDS. Whether the behavior leads to the virus triggers the end results or the behavior leads to the end results directly seems to be irrelevant to me.

Actually, "behaviour" would not "cause" a virus, it would simply provide a vector for spreading the virus. In that situation, the behaviour itself is not inherently the problem but rather the situation of exposure to the virus during the behaviour.
17 posted on 08/08/2002 8:06:20 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: College Repub
Exactly. A person is dying from a gunshot wound, and the people on this thread are arguing over the caliber of the bullet.
60 posted on 08/08/2002 9:56:30 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: College Repub
OK, guys -- what it is: AIDS is a largely BEHAVIOR RELATED CONDITION!

Bill Clinton's CDC released figures a few years ago reflecting that fully 85% of all AIDS/HIV cases are

1. Active, non-monogamous homosexuals,
(the largest subset)

2. Heterosexuals and bisexuals who have had sex with group 1 and

3. IV drug abusers who share needles.

(Kinda gives new meaning to Romans 6:23, doesn't it?)

The remaining 15% (the REAL "victims" of AIDS!!) are those who have contracted AIDS via other, non-sexual/non-drug means SUCH AS TRANSFUSIONS OF TAINTED BLOOD (which one homosexual "leader" on the West Coast URGED his fellow homosexuals to CONTINUE to attempt to contaminate in order to involve the straight community in the push to increase federal funding for AIDS research).

What a guy -- er -- GAY!

66 posted on 08/08/2002 10:45:40 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson