Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JameRetief
I work in a hospital. I personally know an individual that received blood from an HIV positive donor. (This was before we had adequate testing) The receipient died of Aids. The receipient had an HIV viral load. If HIV did not kill him WHAT DID?

I think we must be having a tin foil shortage today.

6 posted on 08/08/2002 7:47:19 AM PDT by cpdiii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cpdiii
The receipient had an HIV viral load. If HIV did not kill him WHAT DID

Was he treated with all the poisonous anti HIV drugs
8 posted on 08/08/2002 7:48:58 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
I work in a hospital. I personally know an individual that received blood from an HIV positive donor. (This was before we had adequate testing) The receipient died of Aids. The receipient had an HIV viral load. If HIV did not kill him WHAT DID?

It's likely he died due to the toxicity of the drugs he was being given because he was HIV positive. Perhaps rather than declaring "tin foil" you should read what Duesberg has written. His research is well documented and is quite compelling.

11 posted on 08/08/2002 7:55:18 AM PDT by JameRetief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
The receipient had an HIV viral load. If HIV did not kill him WHAT DID?

Did the patient take that chemotherapy drug that had been classified as too deadly for chemotherapy? Ryan White and Arthur Ashe were both perfectly fine until they went on that drug - then they died. I am spacing out and forget the name of the drug.

43 posted on 08/08/2002 8:56:59 AM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cpdiii
"I work in a hospital."

Doing what? What is your medical education & experience?

"The receipient died of Aids. The receipient had an HIV viral load. If HIV did not kill him WHAT DID?"
uh... I think you just answered your own question. He did of AIDs. The fact that he ALSO tested positive for the presense of HIV antibodies is, in fact, a completely separate issue. The man died of AIDS, just like you said.

The whole point of this article, and all of the related links, is that the connection we've all been told exists between the presense of HIV antibodies and the AIDS virus is fiction. Not only is that connection scientifically unproven, but the assumption flies in the face of all the evidence and all previous medical knowledge.

Contrary to what you saw on that Dateline special and regardless of what Connie Chung or Phil Donahue might have said..... the presense of HIV antibodies and the affliction known as the AIDS virus are two separate medical diagnoses. HIV & AIDS are not the same thing. now go back and read some of the articles linked above.

52 posted on 08/08/2002 9:14:44 AM PDT by Lloyd227
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson