I think we must be having a tin foil shortage today.
It's likely he died due to the toxicity of the drugs he was being given because he was HIV positive. Perhaps rather than declaring "tin foil" you should read what Duesberg has written. His research is well documented and is quite compelling.
Did the patient take that chemotherapy drug that had been classified as too deadly for chemotherapy? Ryan White and Arthur Ashe were both perfectly fine until they went on that drug - then they died. I am spacing out and forget the name of the drug.
Doing what? What is your medical education & experience?
"The receipient died of Aids. The receipient had an HIV viral load. If HIV did not kill him WHAT DID?"
uh... I think you just answered your own question. He did of AIDs. The fact that he ALSO tested positive for the presense of HIV antibodies is, in fact, a completely separate issue. The man died of AIDS, just like you said.
The whole point of this article, and all of the related links, is that the connection we've all been told exists between the presense of HIV antibodies and the AIDS virus is fiction. Not only is that connection scientifically unproven, but the assumption flies in the face of all the evidence and all previous medical knowledge.
Contrary to what you saw on that Dateline special and regardless of what Connie Chung or Phil Donahue might have said..... the presense of HIV antibodies and the affliction known as the AIDS virus are two separate medical diagnoses. HIV & AIDS are not the same thing. now go back and read some of the articles linked above.