Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: backhoe
Thanks! Good Reads! I have been keeping up with this issue closely....even doing my own research. I shake my head thinking about the ramifications. Those 'in charge' seem to be blind...or want to be blind...the old 'elephant in the room' scenario.
17 posted on 08/08/2002 3:38:11 PM PDT by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: All
I don't understand all the whining...

If the government can tell you what you may not ingest, it can certainly tell you what you must ingest...

And then force you to take it...

The mom should drug the kid and shut the hell up...

After all, government always knows best, and besides, it's for the children...

18 posted on 08/08/2002 3:43:15 PM PDT by Ferris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: BossLady
I believe it was right after Columbine that Ken Hamblin ( a very good guy on radio ) had a special on psychotropic drugs like these, and amidst all the screeching from people who were offended that he even questioned the overuse of said drugs, some rather unnerving things emerged:

1- they seem to induce psychosis in some people
2- one you have a history of taking these drugs, your ability to join the military, fly a plane, etc., is "conditional..."

It's been so long I can't recall exactly what was said, but it was typical clintonian weaseling-- you could still join the military, but they'd never let you handle firearms or explosives. I think the pilot's license was similar- you could still get one, but never pass the medical ( as best I recall... ) so you could never fly- but technically, you weren't barred.

20 posted on 08/08/2002 4:01:00 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson