Show it in the record. Everything else is just piffle.
What you have to do is say, "McPherson says it was this, when it was really this."
But you can't do that.
Walt
Already did and you can find both at the following links.
Documentation that McPherson's history is erronious: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/730287/posts?page=1,100
Documentation of McPherson's suspect authority as an objective or balanced historian: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/727203/posts?page=160#160
Both have been readily available on FR for some time now having given you plenty of chances to address them. To date you have refused to do so, but as always my invitation extends to you: Refute them - any part of them - if you dare.
What you have to do is say, "McPherson says it was this, when it was really this." But you can't do that.
To the contrary, as that is exactly what occupies the entirity of my post found at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/730287/posts?page=1,100
You have obviously not bothered to even read that post, hence your fibbing about the record of this thread.