Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Saturday, August 10, 2002

Quote of the Day by kristinn

1 posted on 08/10/2002 7:31:11 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2
Now the liberal media will spin Hillary's genorosity for giving such a large contribution to charity.
2 posted on 08/10/2002 7:33:01 AM PDT by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Thank you for the news.
3 posted on 08/10/2002 7:33:37 AM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Hillary Clinton can stay the hell outta Texas. Let her go on vacation with her own husband--if she can find him!
6 posted on 08/10/2002 7:35:36 AM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Does anyone believe that an arrogant democrap crook like Sammie Waksal didn't also give Hillie campaign CASH, as well? Sam KNOWS the rules don't apply to him, so why follow the campaign contribution limits? Give Hillie a brief case full of cash, for those special purposes, and hope that there is payback in the future. Rich was allowed to buy a pardon, after all.
7 posted on 08/10/2002 7:37:33 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Wonder why they didn't find a Republican to comment on this embarrassment of a flip-flop? If it was a Republican you could bet there would be several Democrats weigh in on it with lots more negative spin.
8 posted on 08/10/2002 7:39:07 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
In the past, Clinton has handed over questionable campaign money.

Only after investigations and to cover-up the embarrassing situations. Hillary never volentarily gave up contributions without outrage from the public.

10 posted on 08/10/2002 7:42:29 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Waksal was charged with obstruction of justice and bank fraud in addition to previous securities fraud and perjury charges.

These are the only type of people that would support a Clinton....

11 posted on 08/10/2002 7:43:25 AM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The remaining $26,000 was donated to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's New York Senate 2000, a soft money account set up on Clinton's behalf.

What's so impressive about this?!

12 posted on 08/10/2002 8:03:54 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
why not return it to the people it was stolen from?
13 posted on 08/10/2002 8:08:19 AM PDT by johnboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Not to worry. The Clintons have several charitable trusts in their own name. Senator Clinton will, I'm sure, give this money to a worthy charity, probably the Clinton Family Trust, a 501c(3) entity.

See, she donated it to charity, didn't she?
15 posted on 08/10/2002 8:23:27 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
I thought I just heard on Fox News (and so did a friend of mine) that the donation totaled $63,000. So which is correct?
16 posted on 08/10/2002 8:25:10 AM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson