[punkit]

Seems there is a growing cottage industry all over the internet devoted to debunking her latest book, footnote by footnote. Site are springing up all over the place.

She certainly does evoke a great amount of interest and strong emotions in people.

If nothing else, it's all quite humorous to read.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Seems there is a growing cottage industry all over the internet devoted to debunking her latest book, footnote by footnote.

You do realize the stakes, don't you? What if someone walked into the Supreme Court and demanded that broadcast journalism be suppressed as unconstitutional government partisanship? They could plump Slander on the bench and say, "If any one of these charges is unrebutted, the FCC is guilty of malfeasance or nonfeasance in allowing the broadcasting of journalism." And they'd be right!

Broadcast journalism gave us Floriduh 2000, and they should be sued into oblivion because of it!

[Paul Atreides]

Seems there is a growing cottage industry all over the internet devoted to debunking her latest book, footnote by footnote. Site are springing up all over the place.

LOL! There was an article posted on FR the other day, by a Ann-hating columnist, taking her to task over her mention of the NYT coverage of the death of Dale Earnhardt. Out of that entire book, the only "smoking gun" he had was Ann, supposedly, getting wrong the amount of the NYT's covereage of the death.

[bonesmccoy]

I have not read her book, although I am sure that it is humorous. On the other hand, Fred Barnes, Morton Kondrake, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Peggy Noonan have excellent columns that more than saturate any free hours of the night.