Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top 100 American Speeches of the 20th century
University of Wisconsin-Madison and Texas A & M University ^ | December 15, 1999 | Stephen Lucas

Posted on 08/11/2002 12:58:07 PM PDT by jern

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: BluesDuke
thanks-- I admit I was too lazy to look for it. While you bring up speech-writers, they (not you) follow the usual liberal propaganda of ascribing Reagan's words to a speechwriter, while not giving Teddy Sorenson the well-deserved credit for # 2.
61 posted on 08/11/2002 3:26:21 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Numbers Guy
As far as acceptance speeches go, Goldwater's is underrated, because it's clear they take into account future significance and Goldwater launched the movement that led to Reagan

agreed it's a great speech and underrated, but disagree (quibble) as to the reason for its greatness. From 1964, to provide a roadmap to the end of the Soviet Union, as it did,25 years later, makes it one of the greatest speeches of history.

62 posted on 08/11/2002 3:33:24 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jern
For JFK, read Ted Sorenson.
63 posted on 08/11/2002 3:36:19 PM PDT by rightofrush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Where is GW's speech before congress after 9/11?
64 posted on 08/11/2002 3:38:33 PM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
Actually, my favorite Bill Clinton speeches started with:
"I did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinsky..." and
ended with his "apology" and impeachment. A really good
show. Too bad it wasn't followed up by his imprisonment.

I believe he started his answer with, "I want you to listen to me, I'm going to say this again, I did not . . . "

Of course, that part turned out to be just another lie, also. He didn't have the guts to say it again in public.

65 posted on 08/11/2002 3:39:38 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jern
Mario Cuomo, Barbara Jordan, Jesse Jackson? If these truly were the greatest orators of the 20th Century, we would have to tag that era as being the Century of Mediocrity and Marxism.
66 posted on 08/11/2002 4:49:29 PM PDT by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
Tear into it? You mean you can't quote Barbara Jordan's Keynote Speech to the Democratic National Convention on 12 July 1976 from memory? The only reason that speech is number 5 instead of number 1 is because we live in a racist/sexist/ageist/lookist society!!!!!

SHAME, I say! SHAME!!!!

67 posted on 08/11/2002 6:54:26 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
Agnew's "nattering nobobs of negativism" should have made the list, as it is such an appropriate description of so much that is on it.

You know, I think that's on it at number 50.

68 posted on 08/11/2002 6:58:35 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: StockAyatollah
Cuomo did give a pretty good speech that one time. Great Orator? Well, broken [analog] clocks...
69 posted on 08/11/2002 7:31:17 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
>>>WHO IN THE WORLD said Reagan was a commie?

You inferred, Ronald Reagan was a communist. If that's not what you meant, okay.

If your deductive reasoning, or should I say, convoluted reasoning concludes, FDR, JFK, LBJ are in the same political class as "Lenin or Stalin or Pol Pot", I say that's quite a stretch, indeed. In that case, you're the last one that should be offering history lessons to anyone.

70 posted on 08/11/2002 7:55:19 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
My bad. The first thing I did was leap into the list looking for the ranking of Dubya's speech to see if they agreed with the analysis I mentioned. The 20th Century went in one eye and out the other.
71 posted on 08/11/2002 8:44:11 PM PDT by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
...while not giving Teddy Sorenson the well-deserved credit for # 2

And, though I could be wrong, wasn't JFK's Pulitzer Prize-winning Profiles in Courage predominantly a ghosted job?
72 posted on 08/11/2002 8:51:10 PM PDT by BluesDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Bump.
73 posted on 08/11/2002 8:56:05 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
My impression from the historical record, is that Jack Kennedy and Dick Nixon were political twins. One was a moderate, pragmatic, anti-communist, and the other was a ... moderate, pragmatic anti-communist.

So, in fact, might Joseph McCarthy have been classified. Outside the Communist question, McCarthy frequently enough took positions on domestic policy that would probably get him denounced as a RINO in other times and places. (In fact, McCarthy before the infamous Wheeling speech that launched him across the national radar seems to have had a reputation as one of the more moderate-to-liberal of Republican lawmakers...)
74 posted on 08/11/2002 8:56:08 PM PDT by BluesDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jern
Left wing bilge.

One must seriously doubt the sanity of a person or group of people who would consider putting ANY speech by the politicized likes of Jesse Jackson, Ann Richards, Stokely Carmichael, Mario Cuomo, Geralding Ferarro, and Anita Hill above the perfectly well known, non-partisan "no brainer" inclusion of Lou Gerhig.

75 posted on 08/11/2002 11:10:25 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
I agree...the "tear down this wall" speech (if this is the one) was definitely a top 5.
76 posted on 08/11/2002 11:40:38 PM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: Reagan Man
I inferred nothing of the kind! Read it again. And my reasoning skills are right up there, pal, else I wouldn't have an advanced degree in mathematics. As for LBJ, et. al, not being communists simply because they didn't "achieve" all Pol Pot did, where are your reasoning skills? There are only a handful of communists who encounter as few obstacles as Pol Pot did in realising his dreams but billions who die frustrated.
78 posted on 08/12/2002 2:36:27 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jern
This is actually humorous. Guess they'll add Terry McAuliffe soon?
79 posted on 08/12/2002 2:49:46 AM PDT by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson