Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neo-Conservatives are not Conservatives
Sierra Times ^ | August 12, 2002 | Jeff Adams

Posted on 08/12/2002 5:48:59 AM PDT by sauropod

Neo-Conservatives are not Conservatives

By Jeff Adams
Published 08. 8. 02 at 21:29 Sierra Time

Several years ago, I noticed the term "neo-conservative" come into frequent use. I have grown to hate this word because it gives people who bear the term false credentials as true conservatives.

To me, true conservatives fit the description of what used to be called the "Old Right." These "new conservatives" present nothing that reflects the ideas of the "Old Right," or traditional conservatism. Neo-conservatives see nothing wrong with big, centralized government, as long as they, the neo-conservatives, are in charge instead of liberal Democrats. That's like saying, "It would be okay if America was ruled by a dictator, as long as I was the dictator, because I would surely be a benevolent dictator." But you can't count on the next guy to be benevolent. It's asinine.

There is a saying: "Conservatives never conserved anything." In most ways the saying is true. Leading neo-conservatives of today have very moderate stances when it comes to traditional values concerning marriage, sexual mores, immigration, taxation, property rights, limited government, and religion. These people claim to be leaders in the conservative faction of politics. Quite frankly, if you were to put their views and ideas on paper and lay them beside the views and ideas of a liberal Democrat, you would have a hard time telling which ideas were the liberal Democrat's and which came from the neo-conservatives.

Neo-conservatives are in reality neo-socialists, for they cloak their big government socialism in the ideas of big business and they believe that big, centralized government is okay as long as "conservatives" run it. They are the front men for large corporations. They tout capitalism, but in reality they are advocates of mercantilism. This is a close cousin to the state-controlled economies of communist countries. Yes, those economies: the ones that all failed miserably.

What we have in neo-conservatives is a bunch of liberals who are "pretenders to the throne" of conservatism. Real conservatism is actually traditionalism. In that sense, I am not a conservative, but a traditionalist. A "Southern Traditionalist" to be exact. I cling to the ideals and values of our colonial forefathers, and the people of the South who dared stand against Lincoln and the forces of centralization and mercantilism. These new false conservatives can mouth their platitudes and claim to be for tradition all they want. But when their kind continues to expand federal power, to limit our freedoms and liberties, and to accept as normal the perversions that go on in our society, they had best keep in mind that traditionalists like myself see through this façade, and we have had enough. Our numbers are growing, and we no longer believe we have to vote for false conservatives as the "lesser of two evils."

The loud booming voices of neo-conservatism are false prophets. It is like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of neo-conservatism and you will see not a conservative, but a socialist. Is it any wonder that many of today's noted neo-conservatives are "former" leftists of the 1960's, or had parents who were members of the Communist Party, USA? Don't two of the Republican's big "conservatives," Orin Hatch of Utah and John McCain of Arizona, spend much of their time "in bed" with Ted Kennedy? When Mississippi's "conservative" Trent Lott was majority leader in the U.S. Senate, did he push a conservative agenda? (The answer, of course, is a very loud "NO.") What has the "arch-conservative" John Ashcroft done since becoming Attorney General? With his help, we are headed toward a police state.

Off hand, the only real conservative, or traditionalist, I see on the national scene is Congressman Ron Paul of Texas. People like him deserve our support. The socialists in neo-conservative clothing need to be spurned. I would rather "throw my vote away" on an independent or third-party candidate and sleep well at night because I didn't contribute to the continuing downfall of our lost republic by voting for a neo-conservative/socialist, than choose "the lesser of two evils" and know that I voted into office someone who was going to go for my wallet and stab me in the back as if he were a common street mugger.

Neo-conservatives are really neo-socialists. True conservatives/traditionalists should denounce these frauds. Just as the original definition of the word "liberal" no longer applies in our society, "conservative" doesn't mean what it used to, not when it comes out of the mouths of the political phonies that man the barricades of the Republican Party. I'm not a neo-conservative, or even a conservative. They've ruined that word. I am a Traditionalist. I hope all who love their freedom, fear God, and know what we have lost, will step up and put on the Traditionalist mantle to help separate themselves from the pretenders who think we will vote for them this election year because they believe we have nowhere else to turn.

© 2002 SierraTimes.com (unless otherwise noted)


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: liberals; morbidwasteoftime; neocon; paleocon; realamericans; wasteofbandwidth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-217 next last
To: sauropod
I refer to them as Neo's.

Conservatives don't need hyphens.
61 posted on 08/12/2002 8:22:59 AM PDT by Barnacle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
This article is spot on. In fact, I got myself banned for argueing with the many wimpy neo-cons we have on FR.
62 posted on 08/12/2002 8:24:38 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Whatever you say Jeff baby. The only bit in the piece that has any nexus with reality is that big that neocons are not hard-wired to have an Pavlovian anti-government attitude about everything government does or should be doing. We take on issues one at a time, and consider the merits.
63 posted on 08/12/2002 8:29:23 AM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Did you actually type "South" and "bigot" in the same sentence with a straight face?

Pretty easily I imagine because it's true

64 posted on 08/12/2002 8:31:30 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
I plan on doing my part in reviving the label and making it stick to these anti-liberty, anti-South bigots.

They seem to be trying to distence themselves from the term, at least those who understand the definition
65 posted on 08/12/2002 8:33:49 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
....and the "Neo-Conservatives" will respond by labeling "Traditionalists" as "Neo-Reactionaries" to the enjoyment of the other major party and most of the Third Parties.
66 posted on 08/12/2002 8:37:06 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: apochromat
Than again, it could be Neo as in a New tank of gas for a New car.

Or New Coke.

67 posted on 08/12/2002 8:37:36 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
.... and approximately 80 percent of my misspellings are quoted back to me.
68 posted on 08/12/2002 8:41:27 AM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: apochromat
I had one once, but the wheels fell off.
69 posted on 08/12/2002 8:45:05 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
Yup, that movement began under National Review, on through to Goldwater, and culminated in Reagan.So, are the paleos saying their day is but upon us all?

What has me scratching my head is the "neos" continual tendancy to demonstrate their total contempt for the "paleos" when, at the same time, they know full well they are the life force of their party.

AKA cutting off nose to spite face.

70 posted on 08/12/2002 8:53:39 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ohioman
In fact, I got myself banned for argueing with the many wimpy neo-cons we have on FR.

Wimpy? Bring it! Let's see just how much of a "wimp" this so-called "neo" truly is.

When those types of epithets are tossed around, I then get up in your face.

And to think that you have my homestate in your username with such an attitude.

Whatever.

But like I said, "Bring it!"

71 posted on 08/12/2002 8:53:56 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
AKA cutting off nose to spite face.

BTW, ever wonder how Reagan managed to avoid this unhappy result?

72 posted on 08/12/2002 8:56:06 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Actually, most people do not realize it, but a lot of what Hillary proposed has been instituted. I don't think they intended to get socialized medicene at that time. It was good enough to get people up in arms, then defeat her, then she could go about getting it implemented a little at a time. Many, many of her ideas were forced upon insurance companies, forcing many small conservative (well-managed) insurance companies out of business, thereby, giving the American people less and less power over their own healthcare. I hope no one thinks socialized medicene is dead. It is alive and well and growing.
73 posted on 08/12/2002 8:58:47 AM PDT by nanny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; All
I did not see in the article either a reference to examples of neo-conservatives (i.e., names of influential neo-conservatives -- I don't think Orin Hatch nor John McCain would fit the characterization of a neo-conservative), nor quotes from neo-conservatives to indicate that the writer of the article wasn't simply setting up a straw man to tear down.
74 posted on 08/12/2002 9:06:02 AM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wku man; Abundy; tgslTakoma; George Frm Br00klyn Park; Gore_ War_ Vet; GunsareOK; ned13
De nada! Neo-cons are bedwetters. And to someone else that said that he has never met a neo-con, i can tell ya that the People's Republic of Maryland is infested with them. They are called the Republican Party of Maryland ;-) ;-).
75 posted on 08/12/2002 9:09:28 AM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I'm reformed lefty as well....guess that makes me a neocon too....yet my views are often to the right of the Goldwater club. Labels can be decieving.

Anybody thinks Sowell is not conservative is deluded.

76 posted on 08/12/2002 9:11:46 AM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever; countrydummy; dixie sass; LurkerNoMore!; RaceBannon; KLT; OneidaM; Oschisms; Nitro; ...
Be happy to. Explain why (again) to me that we have to support the Shrub because he is "our guy" in spite of signing the "Patriot" Act, the Farm Bill; CFR; and he will sign the Prescription Drugs for Seniors??? If W. is not a neo-con, then what is?

Use Crayola this time. Just to make sure I get the point why it is not ok to criticize folks for "not being conservative enough." < /sarcasm>

Deus Vult! 'Pod

77 posted on 08/12/2002 9:13:32 AM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever; countrydummy; dixie sass; LurkerNoMore!; RaceBannon; KLT; OneidaM; Oschisms; Nitro; ...
Be happy to. Explain why (again) to me that we have to support the Shrub because he is "our guy" in spite of signing the "Patriot" Act, the Farm Bill; CFR; and he will sign the Prescription Drugs for Seniors??? If W. is not a neo-con, then what is?

Use Crayola this time. Just to make sure I get the point why it is not ok to criticize folks for "not being conservative enough." < /sarcasm>

Deus Vult! 'Pod

78 posted on 08/12/2002 9:13:38 AM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
Better check your history.
79 posted on 08/12/2002 9:15:02 AM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
R U "pro-choice?" R U in favor of the chickenhawks calling for the war on Iraq? R U in favor of "faith-based" government programs?

If no, then you are not a neo-con in the way i define the term.

William Kristol is the epitome of the term. 'Pod

80 posted on 08/12/2002 9:17:26 AM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson