Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ridgeway
The Word wrap was off. My bad.

Noam is a psychopath, but you GWB seem to be too, insisting that that "treasure trove" he distorts is not available from public consumption, when all any American has to do is go ask for something and WOW it's there!

The fact is he distorts every one of his "sources".
For goodness sakes he distorts his main source for many main dishonest(all are dishonest)claims, being that of Op-Ed pieces in the NYT, a liberally biased site if their ever was one. He is a marxist pure and simple, and all of his books are crap. By the way I still love your unsubstanited claims of him being "devasting" in his dishonest view of the world(despite all the facts that point to my position, also simple logic and reasoning, like the fact he claimed 500,000 people died from our bombing in Cambodia, which was unsubstaniated and completely ignores the documented facts presented by the many books on the subject of how the bombing was conducted on Communist bases and legitimate military targets in lightly poulated areas, since refugees streamed to Lon Nol's safe towns and a already lightly poulated area became even less poulated), which you came up with through your imaginary poll of the public, in which you claimed only 5% of the American public knows who he is.
You imagninary Gallup poll was entertaining, quite entertaining, as you uninformed view of East Timor.

To view Chomsky seriously is essentially to view an evil sadistic-wacko as a legitimate authority on foreign policy.
The equivilant of this is viewin Charles Manson as a good example of a sane person. The equivilant of course is illogical and unreasonable, immoral, and shows some hidden motive and sophist BS behind your actions. His criticisms dishonest, his "facts" taken out of context, his many half-truths and appaling logic abundant, his flagrant missuse of the English language and the changing of the meaning of words, his treasonist visit to Hanoi in the 70's, and his regurgitating in the most nihlistic and complicated way of Communist propganda.

By the way the few responses to his madness and his cult's supidity are damning, logical, moral, and reasonable. Those are 3 things his and his pathetic leftist ilk and a jackass moral relativist admirers don't have, because you can only use logic and reason with a brain.

In the end Chomsky does not tell the truth, his versions of "truth" are always untruthful, dishonest, and wrong at every turn. He is a joke. That is why I laugh at him.
27 posted on 10/17/2002 3:44:07 PM PDT by Ridgeway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Ridgeway
Yawn...

You didn't really expect anyone to read that screed, did you?

Chomsky's influence is over anyway. I do think it will be interesting to observe the infighting among his cult followers following his death.
28 posted on 10/18/2002 4:05:45 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson