Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Introduction to Politics (Read Ann Coulter's Slander says NRO'S SENIOR EDITOR)
nationalreview ^ | 8/13/2002 | Kathryn Jean Lopez

Posted on 08/13/2002 10:21:41 AM PDT by TLBSHOW

Introduction to Politics

Everything you already suspected about American politics but thought was too ridiculous to be true.

In a recent column, Charles Krauthammer wrote what is bound to be one of the master's classic columns. It opened: "To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil."

Oh yes. It kinda is that simple. Politics 101 students take note.

Any way you look at it, political discourse in America is pathetic. No one could blame you if you've done a little praying that Osama bin Laden is dead and without access to Larry King. Imagine him watching serious debate over whether or not we should say "one nation under God." Imagine him listening to pundits argue about whether the president should be stationed in Texas this month.

But all of that is just the tip of the iceberg. The real stupidity comes when the pundit game becomes Right-vs.-Left. Things that would be considered hate crimes if lobbed at liberals are par for the course when it's conservatives who are the targets.

And, of course, it's not only the pundits. If it were just the pundits, we wouldn't be complaining. It's the news anchors. It's the front-page news editorialists posing as reporters in the nation's most-read papers.

It's no breaking news, of course. But in Slander, Ann Coulter does an excellent job of throwing example after example in the faces of many of the media folks she's finding herself head-to-head with now that she's in book-tour mode. That her "interview" with Katie Couric was widely hailed as a win for Coulter is remarkable — and the whole interview, and others like it, are proof that Ann is far from delusional.

If you think it's all conservative whining, pick up Ann Coulter's book and take a look for yourself.

An aside: NRO is being mentioned in many of Coulter's interviews of late. No complaints here — all publicity is good publicity. The prevailing storyline is that NRO "censored" Ann and then "fired" her. But Ann set things straight in her now-infamous Today Show interview. After running one column — on Sept. 13 — that garnered a lot of attention (from CAIR-types especially), we declined to run a follow-up, and after some public statements from Coulter (using the word censorship) that we disagreed with, NRO decided to drop her column. We all got some publicity from it and other venues picked up her column. No firing, no censorship. Just an editorial decision.

Now, back to Slander. The book reminds me why we picked her syndicated column up in the first place — Coulter has a way with words. And she has a laser-like ability to home in on the hypocrisies and cruelties and stupidity of the Left.

When Coulter lays out the case, you wonder how adults can actually watch and read this stuff. It's terribly grade-school in its intellectual level. Take, for instance, the perennial argument that Republicans are just plain dumb:

Howell Raines, former editorial page editor of the New York Times, who covered the Reagan White House with the Times's trademark objectivity, asserted that "Reagan couldn't tie his shoes if his life depended on it." And still, somehow he won the Cold War. Al Gore told Virginia voters at a campaign rally that they should re-elect Virginia Senator Chuck Robb because his opponent, Oliver North, was supported by "the extreme right wing — the extra-chromosome right wing." (The presence of an "extra chromosome" is the birth defect that creates Down's syndrome.) The Washington Post famously reported as hard fact that followers of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson "are largely poor, uneducated and easy to command." Paula Jones was attacked by Newsweek's Evan Thomas as "some sleazy woman with big hair coming out of the trailer parks." Aren't these the same people constantly demanding campus speech codes, an end to "intolerance," and "hate speech" laws — so that no one's feelings get hurt?

Also, Republican women are ugly. Remember the Linda Tripp treatment. Or Katherine Harris. Or Bonnie Erbe's cruel, unjustifiable swipe against fellow panelist Linda Chavez on that insufferable PBS show To the Contrary (yes, they are even mean on PBS). The list goes on.

Maybe it's understandable, Coulter offers. "Perhaps if conservatives had had total control over every major means of news dissemination for a quarter century, they would have forgotten how to debate, too, and would just call liberals stupid and mean. But that's an alternative universe. In this universe, the public square is wall-to-wall liberal propaganda."

Coulter does a lot of useful things in her book. Besides reminding conservatives they aren't crazy, and that they really are being called names in American homes on a near-daily basis, she deconstructs the sham phrase "religious right" — providing some handy numbers as well as pointing out that "the religious right is a totemic symbol, a permanent terrorizing influence on the brainwashed masses." Coulter also gives well-deserved kudos to Phyllis Schlafly, who single-handedly stopped the Equal Rights Amendment — no simple feat, that — and yet is treated like a simple wacko with no claim to historical fame: not a legitimate political player, but a schoolmarmish prude.

Coulter's book is a success and some of the liberal media types surely hate her for it. But if she's right — and the evidence seems to suggest that she is — they've had some practice. And Slander evidently has had some resonance beyond the Media Research Center fundraising base, because the book is hot — topping the New York Times and Amazon.com lists for multiple weeks. Katie Couric may have been snippy, but the book was unveiled on The Today Show. She's debated Phil Donahue about it. Last night I walked into the 42nd Street bus terminal in New York City and saw it there, prominently displayed at the first Hudson News newspaper hut. You really can't beat that for getting word out. And maybe, just maybe, below the protests, Katie, Phil, & co. know it's true.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; commie; liberal; slander
I just received my Alumni Newsletter from High School and on the front page was a story from Richard Brookhiser Senior Editor of National Review, he was a former classmate of mine in high school! LOL

and to think I was trying to get a boycott going of NRO when they dropped Ann.

1 posted on 08/13/2002 10:21:42 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil." I always thought it was the other way around. LOL.
2 posted on 08/13/2002 10:29:55 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
I always thought liberals were evil AND stupid.
3 posted on 08/13/2002 10:33:02 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
he was a former classmate of mine in high school! LOL

I'll bet he tells all his buddies that he knew TLBSHOW way back when, before he became a famous right wing political commentator.

4 posted on 08/13/2002 10:40:58 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
I always thought liberals were evil AND stupid. ROTFL! Good point. But if you had to pick just one, wouldn't it be evil?
5 posted on 08/13/2002 10:40:58 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
evil or stupid
6 posted on 08/13/2002 10:42:02 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
The "anointed" are evil, their sheep are stupid.
7 posted on 08/13/2002 10:43:52 AM PDT by big gray tabby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: big gray tabby
I can go with that.
8 posted on 08/13/2002 10:53:47 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
I always thought it was the other way around. LOL.

Yes it is.

9 posted on 08/13/2002 11:02:19 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I know a lot of Democrats who are about normal but the leaders they have now,Terry,Dickie ect. are so overwhelmed by egoism and power hunger, they are totally blind to the fact that most Americans don't give a rats ass about their political cravings when our Country, family, economy, and way of life is threatened to doom by a bunch of terrorists. The Libs leaders JUST DON'T GET IT YET. I pray they WILL GET IT come election day because voting is our ONLY way to SPEAK LOUD AND CLEAR.
10 posted on 08/13/2002 11:09:30 AM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER; Always Right
those damn right wingers! LOL

why do you think we are called right Like in always right?
11 posted on 08/13/2002 11:14:21 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Even NRO, which dropped Ann as their regular columnist, thinks she did a stand up job. I really think Ann would be great as a radio talk show host. She'd make more money at it and have more fun than she ever does as an attorney. I have a hunch she's bored with the law and would like to move on. Certainly being an author paid off for her and from here on well - the sky's the limit!!!
12 posted on 08/13/2002 11:16:57 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Slander part 2 next?
13 posted on 08/13/2002 11:25:44 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
New Coulter story BUMP!
14 posted on 08/13/2002 11:28:59 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Ann said on Booknotes @cspan.org, that they only used a small part of her material in Slander, because there were so many footnotes to document what she said. She has enough material, on the same idea as Slander, for another book. She was talking about the next book already because it is written already. I guess it is true that she does have Slander part 2 already written.
15 posted on 08/13/2002 11:57:29 AM PDT by hoosierpearl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Ann recently did a substitute gig for Bob Grant on NYC's WOR radio and did an excellent job. She certainly wasn't boring.

For those of you that don't know, Bob Grant is credited by some for inventing the AM radio talk format, although I am sure the 'Rats will just say he stole the idea from Al Gore.
16 posted on 08/13/2002 12:08:41 PM PDT by dinasour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I just finished "Slander" about an hour ago and found it to be an eye opener. Her documentation of the liberal left's tactics and irresponsible tirades against the Right and Republicans was excellent and uncontroverted.

She is truly a jewell.

17 posted on 08/13/2002 12:30:13 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
Very true
18 posted on 08/13/2002 2:27:18 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson