Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First language gene discovered
BBC News ^ | 14 Aug 2002 | Helen Briggs

Posted on 08/14/2002 11:30:16 AM PDT by sourcery

Scientists think they have found the first of many genes that gave humans speech. Without it, language and human culture may never have developed.

Key changes to a gene in the last 200,000 years of human evolution appear to be the driving force.

The gene, FOXP2, was the first definitively linked with human language.

A "mistake" in the letters of the DNA code causes a rare disorder in humans marked by severe language and grammar difficulties.

The gene was discovered last year but now scientists have studied the DNA of apes to see what sets us apart from our closest animal cousins.

Mice to men

German and British researchers looked at the chimp, gorilla, orang-utan, rhesus macaque monkey and mouse.

They wanted to see how the gene differed in mice, monkeys and man.

They found slight but crucial changes to the chemical sequence of the gene that happened during the passage of time.

"This is hopefully the first of many language genes to be discovered," says Wolfgang Enard of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.

"It happened in the same time frame when modern humans evolved," he told BBC News Online.

"It is compatible with the hypothesis that language could have been the decisive event that made human culture possible."

Genetic roots

Changes to two single letters of the DNA code arose in the last 200,000 years of human evolution.

They eventually spread throughout the human population along with our unique capacity for speech.

"The idea is that these changes gave some people an advantage because they were able to communicate more clearly," says co-author Simon Fisher of the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics at the University of Oxford, UK.

"This variation in the gene expanded in the population and became fixed so everybody had what is now the human version of the gene."

The possibility that language has genetic roots was first raised in the 1960s.

Scientists argue that there must be a genetic basis to speech and language.

It is universal, complex and acquired almost instinctively by children at a young age.

'Hard to digest'

The sequence change identified by the German and British team is thought to be linked to an ability to control facial movements - a faculty crucial to language.

John Haught, Professor of Theology at Georgetown University, Washington DC, is not surprised by the finding, reported in the online edition of the journal Nature.

"What may be harder to digest is that such a momentous outcome as language and culture seems to be so exquisitely dependent on a physically infinitesimal genetic difference that allowed for a certain kind of facial movement in our ancestors," he says.

The researchers stress that other speech and language genes are likely to be discovered.

According to Wolfgang Enard there could be anywhere between 10 and 1,000 such genes.

"We don't think this is THE speech gene," Dr Fisher told BBC News Online.

"It influences the ability to speak clearly. The mutation doesn't remove the capacity for speech completely."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 08/14/2002 11:30:16 AM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA
FYI
2 posted on 08/14/2002 11:30:52 AM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Rush it to Ozzie Osborne, STAT!
3 posted on 08/14/2002 11:35:19 AM PDT by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Coming to a pet store witin our lifetimes... Bio-engineered talking pets.

Cats will be smart-asses, I just know it...

4 posted on 08/14/2002 11:39:35 AM PDT by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
A "mistake" in the letters of the DNA code causes a rare disorder in humans marked by severe language and grammar difficulties...


5 posted on 08/14/2002 11:42:10 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
What does the Farsi gene look like?
6 posted on 08/14/2002 11:43:43 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list
Bump.
7 posted on 08/14/2002 11:44:44 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
In a related report, researchers announced the discovery of something that they are calling the "if you don't know I'm certainly not going to tell you" gene. This gene, present only in women, is responsible for the belief that men can understand what they are saying even when they haven't said anything at all.

"We believe this discovery will lead to real breakthroughs in inter-gender communications." said one male researcher. A second female researcher had no verbal comment , but dismissively rolled her eyes and scowled. There was no further comment on what this supposed to mean.

8 posted on 08/14/2002 11:49:26 AM PDT by tcostell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
talking pets

Talking cats? Talking dogs? What would they talk about?

Dogs, maybe. "Dinnertime, isn't it? We should eat soon, or right now."

Cats, maybe. "I see dead mice."

Goldfish, maybe. "Blurp."

9 posted on 08/14/2002 11:50:22 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
un"zip"ed?
10 posted on 08/14/2002 11:50:39 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Too bad Lassie and Arnold Ziffel missed out on this.
11 posted on 08/14/2002 11:53:17 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
Cats will be smart-asses, I just know it...

And dogs will sound like James CarVile in the presence his Master.

12 posted on 08/14/2002 11:58:28 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
"Changes to two single letters of the DNA code arose in the last 200,000 years of human evolution.

"They eventually spread throughout the human population along with our unique capacity for speech."

OK, help me out here. The entire human race is descended from the one individual who experienced this random mutation that enabled speech? Or did the random mutation suddenly start occuring willy nilly in scads of different individuals from whom all of humanity is descended?

I can't really buy either scenario.

13 posted on 08/14/2002 12:12:21 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
But I thought that Serpent Head already WAS a talking animal....
14 posted on 08/14/2002 12:12:53 PM PDT by order_of_reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"...Talking cats? Talking dogs? What would they talk about?..."

You've gotten it right... They'd talk about simple things, straightforward comments and questions probably centering on food and sex for the most part.

Sadly (for humanity) they'd probably end up somewhere comfortably near the top of the lower third of mankind's verbal ability bell curve.

15 posted on 08/14/2002 12:13:26 PM PDT by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: js1138
"...And dogs will sound like James CarVile in the presence his Master..."

I seem to have touched a nerve...

My kid's Corgi will sound like Sean Connery in his prime.

16 posted on 08/14/2002 12:15:52 PM PDT by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
Sean Connery in his prime.

Sean IS in his prime. Ask a woman.

17 posted on 08/14/2002 12:29:19 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
Each individual has many ancestors. You have two parents, 4 grandparents, and 2^N ancestors N-generations removed. With N > 33 (33 generations back), 2^N (the number of ancestors N generations removed) is larger than the total number of humans currently alive. Obviously, it is not possible that each person currently alive has a set of ancestors that is disjoint from that of anyone else. We all share many common ancestors--and the degree to which we share common ancestors increases with each step back into the past.

So it is quite possible that we all could have inherited the same genetic mutation from the same common ancestor who lived 200,000 years ago (that's about 8000 generations ago). If the mutation in question made either survival, or the likelihood of having children, significantly greater, then it is almost certain that we would all by now have inherited this mutation. Linguistic ability definitely aids survival, and also makes one more attractive/acceptable as a mate.
18 posted on 08/14/2002 12:32:07 PM PDT by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
One clue as to what animals might talk about: consider what they seem to understand of speech already. Or see old Gahan Wilson cartoons of "If dogs could speak."

Dog barking: "Bark . . . bark . . . bark."

Dog speaking: "Hey . . . hey . . . hey."

19 posted on 08/14/2002 12:35:30 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: js1138
"...Sean IS in his prime. Ask a woman..."

LOL!

You're probably right.

20 posted on 08/14/2002 12:36:49 PM PDT by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson