Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blaming of the Shrew (Mega-Coulter bashing)
Washington Post ^ | 08/15/2002 | Richard Cohen

Posted on 08/14/2002 9:45:21 PM PDT by Pokey78

May I say something about Ann Coulter? She is a half-wit, a termagant, a dimwit, a blowhard, a worthless silicone nothing, physically ugly and could be likened to Eva Braun, who was Hitler's mistress. As it happens, these are all descriptions or characterizations Coulter uses for others in her book, "Slander." It ought to be called "Mirror."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; anncoulterlist; coulter; dontbeadick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

1 posted on 08/14/2002 9:45:21 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: summer; Howlin; mombonn; Sabertooth; Miss Marple; *Ann Coulter list; BraveMan; 1riot1ranger; ...
A Coulter bashing ping.
2 posted on 08/14/2002 9:46:32 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
These people are just sore because she tells the truth about them.
3 posted on 08/14/2002 9:48:35 PM PDT by mtg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I guess they could ignore her book when it hit number one but now that its still number one the marxist dirtbags are going crazy.
4 posted on 08/14/2002 9:52:32 PM PDT by Brush_Your_Teeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Meeooow! This fellow sure has his undies in a bunch, doesn't he? In his tirade he writes:

This may explain how Coulter came up with a really tolerant way of dealing with the Islamic world: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity,"

Problem is, that isn't what she said about the Islamic world, that's what she said about those who danced in the streets in celebration on September 11.

He just dished up another perfect example of liberal slander for her to put in her next book.....

5 posted on 08/14/2002 9:53:31 PM PDT by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The virtually unknown Cohen attempts to use Coulter's runaway success to ingratiate himself with his fellow RATs. All he's doing is giving Ann free publicity. What a typical RAT maroon.
6 posted on 08/14/2002 9:55:54 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
Mr. Cohen wouldn't know the truth from a lie if his life depended on it. Cohen excused everything Clinton did. He is merely a fellow traveler.
7 posted on 08/14/2002 9:57:28 PM PDT by GaryMontana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brush_Your_Teeth
Has anybody ever heard a Rat fellow traveler try to explain why Slander and Bias became instant best sellers?
8 posted on 08/14/2002 9:58:00 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"...likened to Eva Braun...who was Hitler's mistress"

That clarification was for the Washington.comPost readers benefit. Contrary to Washington.comPost readers beliefs, Eva Braun DID NOT co-star in Green Acres...

9 posted on 08/14/2002 10:00:11 PM PDT by Shovelhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
For me to be even remotely linked to the lovely and intelligent Ms. Coulter is the pinnacle of success for The Shrew!

He sure proves her point with this article doesn't he?

Regards,

TS

10 posted on 08/14/2002 10:01:00 PM PDT by The Shrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
May I say something to and/or about Richard Cohen?

You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As they say in Texas. I'll bet you couldn't pour piss out of a boot with instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won't go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you. You're a putrescent mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a cad, a weasel. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench, a revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon. You are a bleating foal, a curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and then killed themselves in recognition of what they had done. I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same species as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformation. I barf at the very thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut. Lepers avoid you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are a weed, a fungus, the dregs of this earth. And did I mention you smell? Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly. You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs. You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won't have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot. And what meaning do you expect your delusional self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake? You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed drooling meat slapper. On a good day you're a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go. You smarmy lager lout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock. You grotty wanking oink artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill. You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you exist. I despise everything about you, and I wish you would go away. I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Your writing has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I'm sorry. I can't go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest o f this drivel. Duh. The only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped away most of what you wrote, because, well... it didn't really say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creative flame was pitiful. I mean, really, stringing together a bunch of insults among a load of babbling was hardly effective... Maybe later in life, after you have learned to read, write, spell, and count, you will have more success. True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us "normal" people take for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering. But we sometimes forget that there are "challenged" persons in this world who find these things more difficult. If I had known that this was your case then I would have never read your post. It just wouldn't have been "right". Sort of like parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best of luck in the emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a demand on you. P.S.: You are hypocritical, greedy, violent, malevolent, vengeful, cowardly, deadly, mendacious, meretricious, loathsome, despicable, belligerent, opportunistic, barratrous, contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged, imbecilic, insane, arrogant, deceitful, demented, lame, self-righteous, byzantine, conspiratorial, satanic, fraudulent, libelous, bilious, splenetic, spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb, evasive, double-talking, devious, revisionist, narrow, manipulative, paternalistic, fundamentalist, dogmatic, idolatrous, unethical, cultic, diseased, suppressive, controlling, restrictive, malignant, deceptive, dim, crazy, weird, dystopic, stifling, uncaring, plantigrade, grim, unsympathetic, jargon-spouting, censorious, secretive, aggressive, mind-numbing, arassive, poisonous, flagrant, self-destructive, abusive, socially-retarded, puerile, clueless, and generally Not Good. (yes, I'm done now)

Courtesy: The Longest Insult

11 posted on 08/14/2002 10:01:18 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Shrew
Anyone got his e-mail?
I would love to respond to this...
12 posted on 08/14/2002 10:01:55 PM PDT by adingdangdoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Shrew
ping pong
13 posted on 08/14/2002 10:02:02 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Dick.......


14 posted on 08/14/2002 10:02:19 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shovelhead
But she did make wonderful hot cakes, dahling.
15 posted on 08/14/2002 10:04:25 PM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Ad-hominem attacks from a liberal, who'd a thunk?
16 posted on 08/14/2002 10:07:40 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Why don't you tell us how you really feel. :)
17 posted on 08/14/2002 10:18:38 PM PDT by cpdiii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: adingdangdoo
Not positive, but try cohenr@washpost.com

Looking at their directory, you can see how they do their email addresses, even though his is not listed.

18 posted on 08/14/2002 10:20:16 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
As it happens, these are all descriptions or characterizations Coulter uses for others in her book, "Slander."

"I know you are but what am I".This is the mentality of people who can't begin to refute an argument.

19 posted on 08/14/2002 10:24:11 PM PDT by kennyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Richard Cohen just had to publish a response to Ann's book. He just had to.

See, something's bugging Mr. Cohen, something he he can't quite put his finger on. Thus, he imputes to Coulter precisely that which he feels:   anger. And he accuses her of "projection"!

Paragraph after paragraph, each describing various aspects of the book, with nary a refutation nor a cogent rebuttal of her premise. Instead we get pop-psychology masqurading as criticism. In effect, Cohen's biggest complaint about the book, is it's style.

Something's bugging Mr. Cohen. He just can't quite put his finger on it.

So, he does what every liberal does - he insults and slanders her (and by doing so, proves her point completely).

20 posted on 08/14/2002 10:31:57 PM PDT by NorthernRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson