Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gcruse
I don't see what would prevent blue country from going for Hillary plus, whereas Gore couldn't carry Tennessee, you can count on Hillary carrying New York. It is a frightening thought.

Gore carried NY by a much higher percentage than Hillary did in 2000. So there's no gain by having Hillary at the top of the ticket. In fact, having Hillary run, might actually make NY competitive for the GOP. Bush barely lost a number of states - do you really think that Hillary would do better than Gore in New Mexico or Wisconsin or Washington or Oregon?

24 posted on 08/16/2002 9:43:16 PM PDT by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: LenS
you really think that Hillary would do better than Gore
in New Mexico or Wisconsin or Washington or Oregon?

Washington and Oregon?  Yup.  The 2000
election/tossup was balanced on a dime.
I wouldn't want to bet.

31 posted on 08/16/2002 9:50:47 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson