Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

August 19, 1934 - Hitler Endorsed by 9 to 1 in Poll on his Dictatorship, but Opposition Is Doubled
NewYork Times ^ | August 19, 1934 | FREDERICK T. BIRCHALL

Posted on 08/18/2002 10:17:45 PM PDT by swarthyguy

 
Back to Main
 

Student Connections
News Summaries
Daily News Quiz
Word of the Day
Test Prep Question of the Day
Web Explorer
Science Q & A
Letters to the Editor
Ask a Reporter

Teacher Connections
Daily Lesson Plan
Lesson Plan Archive
News Snapshot
Crossword Puzzle
Affiliate Program
Advisory Board
Quote of the Day
Campus Weblines
Education News
Newspaper in Education (NIE) Teacher Resources
Classroom Subscriptions

Parent Connections
Conversation Starters
Family Movie Guide
Site of the Day
Discussion Topics
Product Reviews
Vacation Donation Plan
Educational Products


On This Day in History
Weekly News Quiz
Monthly Calendar
Resources on the Web
Facts About The Times
Specials

Site Guide
Feedback
Job Opportunities


The New York Times on the Web
spacer
Click Here for a Free NYTimes.com's Screensaver

On This Day

This event took place on August 19, 1934, and was reported in the The New York Times the following day.

Read the full text of The Times article or other headlines from the day.

 

Front Page Image

Hitler Endorsed by 9 to 1 in Poll on his Dictatorship, but Opposition Is Doubled



Absolute Power Is Won
38,279,514 Vote Yes, 4,287,808 No on Uniting Offices
871,056 Ballots Spoiled
Negative Count Is Larger in Districts of Business Men and Intellectuals
Hamburg Has 20% Noes
Reich Bishop at Victory Fete Says Hitler's Anti-Semitism Is Fight for Christianity
By FREDERICK T. BIRCHALL
Special Cable to THE NEW YORK TIMES
Special to The New York Times

OTHER HEADLINES

Speaker H.T. Rainey Dies of Pneumonia and Heart Attack: End Comes Unexpectedly: Presiding Officer of the House III at St. Louis Only a Short Time: Had Shown Improvement: Wife Had Left His Hospital Bedside, Believing His Recovery Assured: 74th Anniversary Today: Born on Illinois Farm, Mr. Rainey Served 14 Terms Before Attaining Gavel

Navy Cheers Roosevelt on Visit to Battleships

Cosyns Descends Safely in Balloon: He and van der Eist End Stratosphere Fight in a Field in Yugoslavia: Pond and Sabelli Crash: Not Seriously Hurt as They Hit Mountain in Wales on Rome-Dublin Hop

Business Upswing in Many Nations Shown by Surveys: Foreign Policy Association and Reserve Board Report a Gradual Expansion: Laid to Internal Activity: Decline in Commercial Bank Loans Appears Checked in Some of the Countries

Helen Jacobs Is Victor in Final of U. S. Tennis

Charges Long Aims at a Revolution: Walmsley Says the Senator Told Him He Would Direct a Rebellion in Nation: Congress Coup Planned: New Orleans Moves to Void 'Hitler' Laws as Leaders See a Primary Day Peril

Economic Council Urged by Wallace to Avert Dictator: Secretary Suggests National Body to Coordinate Work of the NRA and AAA: Covering All Interests: Farming, Labor and Finance Would Be Represented, With Government as 'Referee.'

Capone Taken on Barred Cars to Alcatraz With 42 Other Convicts Leaving Atlanta

Japan Will Seize Road, Soviet Fears: Moscow Papers Predict the Forcible Taking of Chinese Eastern Railway: 'Dangerous Result' Seen: Izvestia Says Western World Has Not Been Deceived by Japanese Charges

Irish Blue Shirts Vote to Omit Taxes: Pledge Refusal to Pay Land Annuities While Trade War With Britain Continues: Riots in Dublin Streets: Violence Marks Annual Meeting -- Cork Farmers Fell Trees to Halt Seizures

Berlin, Monday, Aug. 20 -- Eighty-nine and nine-tenths per cent of the German voters endorsed in yesterday's plebiscite Chancellor Hitler's assumption of greater power than has ever been possessed by any other ruler in modern times. Nearly 10 per cent indicated their disapproval. The result was expected.

The German people were asked to vote whether they approved the consolidation of the offices of President and Chancellor in a single Leader-Chancellor personified by Adolf Hitler. By every appeal known to skillful politicians and with every argument to the contrary suppressed, they were asked to make their approval unanimous.

Nevertheless 10 per cent of the voters have admittedly braved possible consequences by answering "No" and nearly [text unreadable] made their answers, ineffective by spoiling the simplest of ballots. There was a plain short question and two circles, one labeled "Yes" and the other "No," in one of which the voter had to make a cross. Yet there were nearly 1,000,000 spoiled ballots.

38,279,514 Vote "Yes."

The results given out by the Propaganda Ministry early this morning show that out of a total vote of 43,438,378, cast by a possible voting population of more than 45,000,000, there were 38,279,514 who answered "Yes," 4,287,808 who answered "No" and there were 871,056 defective ballots. Thus there is an affirmative vote of almost 90 per cent of the valid votes and a negative vote of nearly 10 per cent exclusive of the spoiled ballots which may or may not have been deliberately rendered defective.

How Chancellor Hitler's vote declined is shown by a comparison with the result of the Nov. 12 plebiscite on leaving the Disarmament Conference and the League of Nations. The tabulation follows:

Yesterday Nov. 12
Yes 38,279,514 40,600,243
No 4,287,808 2,101,004
Invalid 371,058 750,282
Per cent of noes 9.8 4.8

These results therefore show that the number of Germans discontented with Chancellor Hitler's course is increasing but is not yet seriously damaging to it. He is the Fuehrer [leader] of the Reich with absolute power by the vote of almost 90 per cent of the Germans in it but the number of dissentients has doubled since the last test.

It is not yet a matter for international concern but there are other considerations which may be.

Dictatorship Now Complete

The endorsement gives Chancellor Hitler, who four years ago was not even a German citizen, dictatorial powers unequaled in any other country, and probably unequaled in history since the days of Genghis Khan. He has more power than Joseph Stalin in Russia, who has a party machine to reckon with; more power than Premier Mussolini of Italy who shares his prerogative with the titular ruler; more than any American President ever dreamed of.

No other ruler has so widespread power nor so obedient and compliant subordinates. The question that interests the outside world now is what Chancellor Hitler will do with such unprecedented authority.

Nazi opinion is not disposed to be altogether cheerful about the result. When one high official was asked by this correspondent to comment on it he said:

"Obviously we feel the effects of June 30."

He referred to the execution of Ernst Roehm and other Storm Troops chiefs.

That is also the opinion of many other Germans, especially among the more substantial classes. They interpret the result as the beginning of a protest against the rule of arbitrary will and as an effort to force Chancellor Hitler back to the rule of law.

In their view the vote may induce the Fuehrer to steer henceforth a more moderate course and take account of the sensibilities of general opinion. Some of the more optimistic even hope it may induce him to get rid of some of his radical advisers to whom the opposition within Germany is great.

This view, however, is not shared generally and the dissent is borne out by the remark of a Nazi official who said bitterly, "We have become too soft."

Ex-Marxists Support Hitler

A feature of the election was that former Marxists cast a far heavier vote for Chancellor Hitler than the so-called bourgeoisie. In Berlin especially, judging by their vote, former Communists still are Leader Hitler's most loyal followers. In one voting district in Wedding, where a few years ago Communists fought from behind barricades against the police, the "yes" votes amounted to 949; the "no" votes and invalid ballots totaled 237.

In one district west of Berlin, inhabited mainly by business men and intellectuals, the "yes" vote only 840 and the "no" votes and invalid ballots totaled 351. Other tests provided similar results.

In the Communist districts protest votes with Communist inscriptions were rare. In Western Berlin they were more frequent. In one district five ballots had the name "Thaelmann" written in. [Ernst Thaelmann is an imprisoned Communist leader.] One ballot contained this inscription, "Since nothing has happened to me so far I vote 'Yes.'" It was signed "Non-Aryan."

Interesting also are the following results: the hospital of the Jewish community in one district cast 168 "Yes" votes, 92 "Noes," and 46 ballots were invalid. The Jewish Home for Aged People in another district cast 94 "Yes" votes, four "Noes" and three invalid ballots. This vote is explainable, of course, by the fear of reprisals if the results from these Jewish institutions had been otherwise. It is paralleled by other results outside Berlin.

In all Bavaria Chancellor Hitler received the largest vote in his favor in the concentration camp at Dachau where 1,554 persons voted "Yes" and only eight "No" and there were only ten spoiled ballots.

Hamburg Leads Opposition

Hamburg, which only two days ago gave Herr Hitler the most enthusiastic reception he had ever received anywhere, led the country in the opposition vote. The official figures were: Total vote cast, 840,000; "Yes," 651,000; "No," 168,000; invalidated ballots, 21,000.

The "No" vote, in other words was 20 per cent of the total vote. Counting the invalid ballots as negative in intent, the total opposition votes exceeded 22 per cent. The percentage of the electorate voting was 92.4.

Hamburg is the home city of Ernst Thaelmann and on his triumphant entry into the city on Friday, Herr Hitler made it a point to drive past herr Thaelmann's former home.

As far as observers could ascertain, the election everywhere was conducted with perfect propriety, and secrecy of the ballot was safe-guarded. The ballots were marked in regular election booths and placed in envelopes and these were put in the ballot boxes. After the voting had ended the ballot box was emptied on a large table and the vote was counted publicly in the regular manner. Appraising of individual votes seemed impossible.

One check on possible non-voters, however, was exercised by instructions that the voting authorizations issued to those who for one reason or another planned to be outside their regular voting district on election day must be returned unless used. The number of such authorizations issued for this election exceeded anything known before.

Throughout the day Storm Troopers stood before each polling place with banners calling on the voters to vote "Yes." Otherwise voters remained unmolested. Inside the polling places uniforms and even party emblems had been forbidden, but the execution of this order was lax. In some apparently doubtful districts brown uniforms dominated the scene as a warning to would-be opponents.

Nazis Try for Record Vote

All past efforts in getting out the German vote were eclipsed in this election. During Saturday night a huge final poster was plastered on billboards everywhere. It said:

Your leader [Hitler] has traveled 1,500,000 kilometers by airplane, railway and motor car in the cause of Germany's rebirth. You have but to walk 100 meters to your voting booth to vote "yes."

All over Germany means were taken to get the Sunday late-sleeping population out of bed early. The polls opened at 8 o'clock, but in Berlin Storm Troops, Hitler Youth Troops and Nazi labor union groups took to the streets as early as 6 o'clock to wake the populace by shouting at them to do their duty


Back to the top of this page.
Back to today's page.
Go to another day.

Front Page Image Provided by UMI
spacer
spacer
Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company
Children's Privacy Notice


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: greatwar; hitler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
A feature of the election was that former Marxists cast a far heavier vote for Chancellor Hitler than the so-called bourgeoisie
1 posted on 08/18/2002 10:17:46 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Goetz_von_Berlichingen; LarryLied
ping
2 posted on 08/18/2002 10:20:54 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: ianync; aristeides; PsyOp; Tropoljac; dighton; belmont_mark; Shermy; Grampa Dave; keri; ...
...former Communists still are Leader Hitler's most loyal followers...
4 posted on 08/18/2002 10:24:30 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tropoljac
Don't forget Wall Street!
5 posted on 08/18/2002 10:30:24 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Tropoljac
The Prussian upper class supported him in desperation for fear of a communist takeover which probably would have happened in days if Hitler wasn't appointed. They wanted a restoration of the monarchy or a right wing military dictatorship( not dictatorship in the totalitarian sense mind you just there would be a dictator who could stop all the strikes, inflation, etc) but the communist always thwarted attempts to do this by calling a general strike. The upper class needed an anti communist with popular support and Hitler was the only man. Papen and Hindenburg's friends thought he would be controllable and they could rule through him but they were wrong. Hitler did stop a communist revolution but at a price just as bad.
7 posted on 08/18/2002 10:32:56 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Tropoljac
http://www.humanitas-international.org/showcase/chronography/speeches/1932-01-27.html

Hitler's speech in Dusseldorf, Industry Club
SPEECH OF JANUARY 27, 1932


9 posted on 08/18/2002 10:47:30 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tropoljac
The real failing of the German upper class was their failure to get rid of Hitler after the Roehm Putsch when any left wing threat to Germany was over( the communist and union leaders had already been arrested and shot and the Roehm Putsch eliminated the far left within the Nazi party). Hitler had then outlived his usefullness as anti-communist. The military had not yet sworn alliegance to him( most of the officiers viewed such oaths as absolute and unbreakable for any reason so after the Fuhrer oath had been administered the prospect of him being overthrown by the army became impossible) and by 1935 with the Nuremberg laws it was fairly clear he was a dangerous man. They should have moved against him then and restored the Holhenzollrens IMHO.
10 posted on 08/18/2002 10:51:50 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
http://www.humanitas-international.org/showcase/chronography/documents/htestmnt.htm

MY POLITICAL TESTAMENT
ADOLF HITLER, Berlin, April 29, 1945

...It is untrue that I or anybody else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made so many offers for the reduction and elimination of armaments, .... that the responsibility for the outbreak of this war cannot rest on me. ... there will arise anew the hatred for the people who alone are ultimately responsible: International Jewry and its helpers!

>>>Yeah, OK, whatever, Mr. Schiklgruber....
11 posted on 08/18/2002 10:52:08 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Let's not go overboard. This was Hitler's rigged election. In the free elections, he only managed pluralities (and the communists and socialists scored serious percentages). But the morons running some smaller conservative parties thought they could manipulate him and work with him. So they backed him, giving him a majority. He kindly let them have most of the cabinet posts. All he wanted was the Interior Ministry for Germany (as well as the Interior Ministry for Prussia) which just so happened to be in charge of the police. You can guess what happened then.

Before the rigged elections after he became Chancellor, Hitler's initial support came from two groups - college students (they gave him clearcut majorities years before his successes elsewhere) and the lower middle class, especially small business owners. He was to be their "protector" against big business and labor. Fools.

12 posted on 08/18/2002 10:54:26 PM PDT by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LenS
Labor was a threat to everyone at that time. During the Weimar Republic it was totally under the control of the communist. General Strikes were the means the commies used to prevent the old Prussian boys from restoring the Holhenzollrens which would have both protected Europe from communism and avoided WWII and the holocaust.
13 posted on 08/18/2002 10:58:08 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
"Ex-Marxists Support Hitler

A feature of the election was that former Marxists cast a far heavier vote for Chancellor Hitler than the so-called bourgeoisie. In Berlin especially, judging by their vote, former Communists still are Leader Hitler's most loyal followers. In one voting district in Wedding, where a few years ago Communists fought from behind barricades against the police, the "yes" votes amounted to 949; the "no" votes and invalid ballots totaled 237"


Well whut-du-ya-know
14 posted on 08/18/2002 11:14:59 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
a great historical bump
15 posted on 08/18/2002 11:23:25 PM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Great post and thread. . .
16 posted on 08/19/2002 12:51:47 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Funny how this reporter seems not to recognize how the yes vote in formerly Communist districts was virtually unanimous because, in the first year of Nazi rule, Gestapo attention was primarily directed against the Communists. The vote in the bourgeois districts was still semi-free. Hence the different results.
17 posted on 08/19/2002 5:03:42 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
They should have moved against him then and restored the Holhenzollrens IMHO.

One of the main reasons Hitler conducted the Blood Purge was that Hindenburg and the Army were threatening to do precisely that, if Hitler did not move against the SA. Once he did, these conservatives were satisfied, and even the simultaneous murder of fellow right-wing officers like Schleicher did not disturb most of them.

18 posted on 08/19/2002 5:06:50 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Hitler was only installed by the old Prussians as a lesser evil then the communist after the Roehm Putsch he had done his job and was simply dangerous. They could have gotten rid of him then and restored the monarchy( a general strike couldn't stop them now as Hitler had already destroyed the unions).
19 posted on 08/19/2002 7:06:45 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
bump for later
20 posted on 08/19/2002 7:08:32 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson