Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheBattman
Did I miss something? The global population is still rising.

I don't like the UN, but its the message, not the messanger that should be heard here. They are accurately pointing out the consequences of low population growth in DEVELOPED (read western) nations to the stability of the economies of those nations. Most of Europe, China, and other places are in slowing growth or population decline and the impacts on work force availability and retirement costs pointed out here are correct. The US would be in the same boat if it were not for its immigration policy, like it or not (and I am not in favor of open borders - I do favor the 'Bring us your best and brightest who want to assimilate' policy).

OTOH, the poorest nations, and coincidently the muslem populations, are growing while their standard of living does not improve. The result is an unstable future and threat for us (those western nations and civilized governments.)

This warning is echoed in studies from our own think tanks and advisors on national security, so focus on the message.

You do have my permission to shoot the messenger. :)

35 posted on 08/21/2002 10:52:00 AM PDT by Magnum44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44
They are accurately pointing out the consequences of low population growth in DEVELOPED (read western) nations to the stability of the economies of those nations.

It is not so much the stability of the economy that is threatened.

It is more the wealth-producing methods of the wealthy that are threatened.

Wealth-producing methods that depend on the Sisypean need for increasing numbers of people to sustain production.

38 posted on 08/21/2002 11:39:04 AM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson