Replies

The government did not go after Randy Weaver because of his beliefs

That's exactly why the Feds targeted Weaver.

(Actually it wasn’t Weaver’s beliefs that got him into trouble; it was his association with the criminal element. The Aryan Nations were already being investigated for the actions to the Order and Weaver’s good friend Pastor Butler was arrested for planning to blow up a gay bar shortly before Weaver was arrested. The issue was about beliefs, it was about crime, and Weaver associated with criminals and participated in criminal activity.)

Weaver was guilty of selling illegal weapons to who he believed was a terrorist;

Wrong again. Weaver wasn't convicted of selling illegal weapons.

(He wasn’t convicted of selling illegal weapons because his lawyers claimed he was entrapped, but that does not negate the fact that Weaver was guilty of committing the crime. That fact is not disputed; Weaver admits it in his book.)

14 year old boys (with other armed gunmen) shooting at you is a legitimate threat.

Weavers son didn't fire at anyone until the Marshalls fired. They killed his dog. The Weaver boy cranked off a couple of rounds, hit Marshall Dugan and then ran away. The Marshalls shot him in the back.

(First of all, the bullet that killed Marshal Degan was fired by Kevin Harris. The U.S. Marshals were not on the Weaver’s property, and a Marshall identified himself to Randy Weaver (within yelling distance) before anyone else fired a shot. Who shot first, and when the dog was shot is disputed.)

The crime is Randy Weaver arming his family and telling them to shot cops in order to prevent him from going to jail.
This is a bald faced lie. Weaver wasn't charged with any such thing.

(Again, there is no dispute about Weaver arming his family. It is common knowledge that the majority of the time the Weavers and Kevin Harris were armed. There are statistics even on the percentage of time each family member was armed while outside the cabin. The Weavers were under surveillance for a good period of time. The Weaver’s friends whom agents were in contact with while the Weavers were hiding out made that report on numerous occasions. The Weavers were video taped conducting drills in which the take fighting positions, and the Weavers also say these things in their book. It doesn’t make it any less of a fact, simply because they weren’t charged with a crime over it. Not every action that is in bad taste requires criminal charges, and simply because criminal charges are not filed, that doesn’t mean that the behavior was appropriate.)

Vicky Weaver is another story, but she was armed at the time she was shot

No she wasn't but it wouldn't have made any difference if she was. Mrs. Weaver was murdered plain and simple.

(Vicky Weaver was wearing a holstered sidearm that was not removed until after she was dead shortly before Randy finally gave up. The shot that hit Vicky was supposedly aimed at Kevin Harris, which the bullet did in fact hit. Whether you believe Vicky was visible or not, the bullet did still hit Kevin Harris so the agent’s story is not outrageous. The poor judgment on the agent’s part was firing into a door without being certain of what was behind it.)

Ruby Ridge was tragic, but it is important not to lose sight of the fact that the law enforcement officers were there doing their jobs

Which Law Enforcement officers are you talking about?

(BATF, US Marshals, FBI)

Do you mean the Prosecutor who deliberately gave Weaver an incorrect court date?

(No, I was not talking about Prosecutors.)

Do you mean the BATF agents who lied to the Judge?

(I mean the BATF agents that successfully arrested Randy initial with no problems for a crime he did in fact commit)

Do you mean the Marshalls who were trespassing on Weavers land without the benefit of a duly constituted Warrant?

(The US Marshals had a warrant for Weavers arrest that is why they were there. Weaver was a fugitive and the Marshals were brought in to bring him to justice. They didn’t break into his house and they would need to cross the outside of his property in order to arrest him no matter what. If you commit a crime you can be arrested anywhere, although a warrant might be required to search someone’s home for evidence, arresting someone out front of their house is not unconstitutional.)

Do you mean the FBI SAIC who wrote what were later found in Court to be un-Constitutional 'Rules of Engagement'?
(Yes, I meant the FBI. The ROE were inappropriate, and that is one of the problems the agencies have since fixed. No body was shot under those rules of engagement.)

And do you mean all those violations of Weavers rights, court procedures, and outright perjury on the part of these 'law enforcement' are part of their jobs?

(What violation of his rights? He knew for many months that he was a fugitive and that the US Marshals were asking him to turn himself in. Once he was arrested, he received a fair trial. Kevin Harris even remarked how well the justice system worked. He received all of his Miranda rights; he had free speech and could practice his religion. He was baring arms even though after his arrest on gun charges he was not legally allowed to. Even if is were true that Weaver was unaware of the change in his court date, WEAVER DIDN’T ATTEND THE ONE HE KNEW ABOUT ANYWAYS. )

The bottom line is that New Students that have never heard of Ruby Ridge should not be taught of a tyrannical government that never existed, but should recognize that when government agents are placed in deadly situations and are placing their lives on the line to protect the honest citizens of America; some times mistakes are made.

These weren't 'mistakes' newbie. These were criminal actions on the part of more than one 'law enforcement' agent in the paid employ of the Federal government which resulted in the murders of people who weren't charged with any crime.

(The ROE that were not even used and have since been corrected were a mistake, but they were based on psychological profiles of individuals who were directly associated with criminals/terrorists and who had already killed a federal agent. They were worried about Vicky Weaver murdering her children before surrendering. This in not an absurd suggestion being that Vicky believed she was fighting a war with the devil and that the devil was coming for her children. She also wrote letters to numerous government agencies addressing them as ‘servants of the queen of Babylon.” Weaver was investigated by the US Secret Service for making threats to assassinate the President of the United States before he even left Iowa. The FBI had reason to believe the Weavers were unstable, and they were focusing on protecting the children. Shooting the dog was a mistake and the firing through a door was a mistake. These issues have been addressed and corrected. The shooting of Vicky Weaver was officially ruled as being constitutional, if you’d like to read the official reports they are available here: http://foia.fbi.gov/rubyridgeshootingincident/rubyridgeshootingincident_part01.pdf
http://foia.fbi.gov/rubyridgeshootingincident/rubyridgeshootingincident_part02.pdf )

some times mistakes are made. They should be acknowledged, corrected, and we should move on to live in a peaceful civilization.

How exactly were these 'mistakes' corrected? Did one single Federal officer spend one single night in jail? Did one single Federal officer pay so much as a five dollar fine? Was anyone fired? Was anyone disciplined in any way?

(The above to links address some of the steps that have been taken. Unfortunately, in order to keep the federal agent’s hands clean they have also stop assisting local sheriffs in similar sieges, placing the burden on inexperienced local police and sheriff offices. No officers went to jail because Vicky Weaver’s shooting was ruled as constitutional, and Weaver’s son and Kevin Harris were involved in a fire fight with law enforcement officers. Here is a hint, if police officers are aiming guns at you or attempting to place you under arrest, and if you refuse, or shoot at them, you are waving your right to a trial and placing yourself in immediate danger.)

Weaver's mistakes should also be expressed so the New Students will not support terrorists wishing to engage in crimes against humanity

Randy Weaver was not a terrorist. He wasn't charged with it, he wasn't tried for it, and he certainly wasn't ever convicted of anything but 'failure to appear'. Your accusing him of supporting terrorism is slander.

(Weaver was speaking with the informant about starting a new group such as the Order to rob banks, blow up dams, and kidnap children. Weaver then sold illegal weapons to this informant with the belief that they would be distributed to street gangs in order to murder minorities. Weaver associated with terrorists (the Ku Klux Klan is a domestic terrorist organization) and yes he was tried for conspiracy to overthrow the United States. The terrorism laws we have today, did not develop until after the Oklahoma City Bombing, but he was charged with conspiracy and associated with groups that committed terrorist acts. I accuse him of supporting terrorism because he admitted to selling illegal weapons to a person he believed to be a terrorist, that comes from his admission and is not something I made up to make him look bad. You do not have to be convicted of supporting terrorism in order for it to be true. Many groups in the US raise money for HAMAS and other groups and are in fact supporting terrorism, regardless of whether or not there is currently enough evidence to convict them.)

After Weaver finally was arrested he did have a fair trial
It's amazing how compliant he got after the Feds murdered his wife and kid....

(He didn’t surrender after either his son or wife was shot. Bo Grits had to talk him into surrendering. Once he was in the justice system he saw that it was run by the devil like he believed it was, and he received a fair trial. Kevin Harris even boasted about how well the justice system worked in his joint book with Randy and Sarah. The problem was that he wasn’t compliant in the first place. When you are placed under arrest within the US you are afford the due process of law, resisting arrest and threatening to law enforcement officers is not the way are justice system works, and if you fire and officers or physically resist arrest you place yourself in unnecessary danger. )

if he only would have trusted in the principles of this country in the first place, he would have been spared a great deal of unnecessary pain.

Weaver actually did. The Feds lied to him about his court date.

(Weaver didn’t show up to any court date other than when he was physically arrested)

If you commit a crime, murdering anyone that attempts to make you pay for your crime

Once again; Randy Weaver was charged with, and found not guilty of, the charge of murder in a court of law.

(Kevin Harris was charged with it, and the fact remains that Randy threatened it. The threats is what led to increased ROE, and the fact that after being ordered not to possess fire arms, Randy routinely was video taped with fire arms in his possession while being a fugitive. Randy’s behavior was erratic, besides the Secret Service investigating him for threatening to kill the President (before leaving Iowa) he also attended a meeting in the local community regarding protecting endangered bears, at that meeting Randy threatened to kill everyone at the meeting if his family had a negative encounter with a bear.)

Funny thing, though. The FBI agent who shot Vicki Weaver in the face never had to go to trial....

(He was never charged with a crime, but he was investigated, went before Congress, and the shooting was ruled Constitutional. What more do you want. If the highest courts in the country ruled that the shot was legal, do you expect the agent to be placed in double jeopardy and have some local judge bubba make a second opinion? The agent said he was aiming for Kevin Harris and the bullet actually hit Kevin Harris, given credence to the theory that the agent was some super sniper that was able to plan out a shot with some magic bullet that can remove to targets at once is not something we should consider as a matter of fact.)

(The majority of my research stems from Kevin Harris, Randy and Sarah Weaver’s book, the book ‘Every Knee Will Bow’ and the Freedom of Information Act Report links above. I am not making stuff up, everything I stated is recorded I just didn’t put page numbers because I was not writing in any official capacity. I have read much more on the subject but most do not provide as accurate of facts as the three I mentioned above. Those sources tell the story from all sides of the players involved. The media, conspiracy theorists, libertarians, Timothy McVeighs, and others provide inaccurate information trying to create a picture of a tyrannical government that doesn’t exist. The government is not run by a Jewish conspiracy, or large corporations, or the anti-Christ, it is still a government run by the people and for the people. Government agents are no different than their fellow citizens, and when they are placed in dangerous situations they are liable to make errors due to stress, just like anyone else might. If guns are drawn, everybody is nervous, that is not the time to defend yourself especially against legitimate law enforcement agencies when you have committed a crime.)

I have seen the evils of government. I can now see how the government has secret plans to kill its citizens. I also see the point about a person’s actions only being defined by what a jury decides after the fact. Police officers should not attempt to arrest or bring a criminal to justice, unless that person is first found guilty in a court of law. The thought of police officers attempting to arrest criminals for crimes that have not yet been established in a court of law seems un-American. It is also absurd to believe government agents are telling the truth. Just because government investigators have determined that Osama Bin Laden is responsible for terrorism, that certainly does not make it true, and since Bin Laden has never been found guilty of terrorism in a court of law, we definitely should not attempt to bring him to justice; that would violate his civil rights, which outweigh the rights of those his actions may hurt.

This line of thinking applies equally well to the gunman in the recent school hostage case http://www.dispatch.co.za/2006/09/30/Foreign/cgun.html . After police officers asked the gunman holding young girls hostage to surrender to the due process of law and he refused, that should have been the end of it (the police should have just went home). Criminals should have the option of ignoring arrest, and if they are unwilling to submit the US legal system, they should have that right. After the gunman decided against trusting in the legal system, he should have been left alone with those girls, after all, the rights of someone with a gun outweigh the safety of the children they might harm. In that case, the police attempted to blow a hole in the wall in order for a sniper to shoot the armed gunman, even though children were present; the police were obviously attempting to prevent the suspect from having a fair trial (at this point he wasn’t even convicted of a crime nor had he a known previous record of violence). Shooting a suspect that may poses a danger to children should be out of the question. Although the use of deadly force can be used if the suspect poses a threat to the officers or OTHERS, using such force just seems wrong and definitely illegal. Trusting law enforcement officers to weigh the dangers and decide on the best course of action to protect its citizens does not seem appropriate (especially since the government is evil).

I had no idea the government was so evil, until taking a closer look at it. Did you know that the planes on 9/11 were really flown by Jews, and that the government knew about it but was willing to kill its own people in order to oppress Palestinians? Also, Iraqis do not want freedom, and they actually really want to die through sectarian violence. Timothy McVeigh was also a government agent who killed American citizens in order for the government to pass laws regulating the militias. Regulating the militias is a total crime, the constitution would never allow for a WELL REGULATED MILITA. Did you know that America is Mystery Babylon the Great from the book of Revelations? American is run by both a Jewish ZOG conspiracy and by the Anti-Christ. America is doomed unless will can elect a communist war protester who has confessed to false war crimes into the Presidency. The weapons our soldiers are fighting with are inadequate, they need rubber bullets and pepper stray now. The people at WACO were not given enough time to submit to arrest, whenever a police officer arrests other people for crimes the suspects are given several months to obey the instruction. The people at WACO that did surrender or did leave the burning building were accidents, the government meant to kill all of its citizens but some were accidentally allowed to be arrested or exit the building. Did you know the war in Iraq was really about oil? It is true, that is why the gas prices are so much cheaper than ever before. The government does not want to listen to the calls made to terrorist overseas, really the government wants to hear want you are saying to your family members, they especially want to know what you buy at the grocery store and what you are going to eat for dinner. The government as hired six people to work in shifts and monitor the phone calls of every single America; for every America citizen there are six times that many people listening to their phone calls. These people are truly evil and are part of the governments plan to find out what you bought at the grocery store, and who you are going bowling with on the weekend.

Okay, maybe not everything above it 100% true, but perhaps we should think about it.