Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/21/2002 4:27:28 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TLBSHOW
Posted by lancer256 On Aug 21 6:11 PM with 4 comments

Lancer256 beat you by about 15 min. The boy has a eye for Ann's mind.

2 posted on 08/21/2002 4:40:16 PM PDT by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
I'm glad she brought up the Kosovo mess and compared it to Iraq. LOL. Good grief. We bombed a bridge during rush hour, deliberately, during Kosovo, for 'ideal impact'. We bombed a Serb TV station because we didn't like what it was saying. Civilian Christian Serbs slaughtered daily in that war for the sake of displaced Albanians trying to move to Kosovo.
3 posted on 08/21/2002 4:40:44 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
*****Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said our purpose in the Balkans was "ending ethnic strife" and creating "multiethnic societies."******

...in addition to that is also helped "move the dialogue forward...(sarcasm)

4 posted on 08/21/2002 4:53:42 PM PDT by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
i have been gone for a couple of weeks has the rule about ann coulter changed since there are no pics
10 posted on 08/21/2002 5:08:08 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
i have been gone for a couple of weeks has the rule about ann coulter changed since there are no pics
11 posted on 08/21/2002 5:08:21 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer; Howlin; mombonn; Sabertooth; Miss Marple; *Ann Coulter list; BraveMan; 1riot1ranger; ...
Pinging the Coulter list.
12 posted on 08/21/2002 5:40:47 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
If the possible nuking of the US is a trigger
to invade Iraq (Iraq has ICBMs?  I really
don't think so.), then shouldn't we be
going into Communist China first?  They
have already professed a willingness to
render Los Angeles livable again, if
slightly radioactive, and China has the
means to deliver.  No, Anne, Saddam's
phantom ability to nuke Manhattan isn't
a threat to the United States, any more
than Slobo's ethnic cleaning was.
We don't yet have any justification
for invading Iraq.  If you're talking
national interest, then the logical
people to take out Saddam are
the Israelis.
15 posted on 08/21/2002 6:02:04 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Bingo. Liberalism is a ploy by a few would be tyrants to gain the support of the masses by convincing them to work for some purpose, any purpose, that is not to one's own damn good, not subject to common sense.

If you're working for the obvious benefit of yourself, your family and your neighbors, doing something you can observe the benefits and costs of, and experience the results of, then you are the enemy of liberals. For you are in control of your own life.

If you can be persuaded, out of guilt or fear or whatever, to work to save the starving children in a faraway land (not the one next door), or the environment (but not the tree in your backyard) or the victims of genocide or the homeless or the elderly (in the abstract - not your actual mother) or world peace or whatever, then you are in the control of the spinmeisters who establish these "goals". They can get you to do anything, just by spinning it right.

For a few, such as Dr. Livingston or Mother Theresa, such faraway ills are immediate and personal, and something to be directly addressed from personal awareness. God bless them.

But do-gooders from a distance are a dangerous fuel for the liberal mischief of tyrants.

16 posted on 08/21/2002 6:13:54 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Another great piece from Ann.
She is a genius in her ability to remind everybody of the dangerous national security threat that faces our nation when Democrats control the White House. Even though the Pentagon and the intelligence services may be able to keep a clown like Clinton from getting a hold of really sensitive stuff, a Democrat White House can still cause lots of mischief and can certainly compromise national security.
23 posted on 08/21/2002 6:28:09 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Liberals hated the war in Vietnam and never said "thank you" to our soldiers who fought there for their loss and great sacrifices. Since then they've tried to make sure the American military never fights a war in which American national interests might really be on the line. Once again they're true to form. Ann says liberals are afraid of the consequences but what she didn't add is that what they're really afraid of is America winning at the same time as they find themselves irrelevant.
26 posted on 08/21/2002 6:44:13 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
I give Ann extra points here for her comment at the end about Vietnam. How much more to the point could she have been?
34 posted on 08/22/2002 6:18:06 AM PDT by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson