This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 08/26/2002 3:31:49 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:
Flamewar.
|
Skip to comments.
The Invasion of Los Angeles
U.S. Census Bureau ^
| 08/24/02
| FreedomFriend
Posted on 08/24/2002 2:37:20 AM PDT by FreedomFriend
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 941-945 next last
To: Paulie; TomGuy; Regulator; Reaganwuzthebest; Fish out of Water; Marine Inspector; ChaseR; ...
ping
To: FreedomFriend
Looking at that area around 2nd, it used to be predominantly Japanese. What happened? It's almost like somebody hauled everybody away?
Were you aware that if you created an equivalent demographic map of California for 1850 the majority of populated areas would be Chinese?!
There would also be very, very few "hispanics", the hidalgos (landlord class people) having withdrawn back to Mexico proper when the American Revolution reached the area. On the other hand, there would still be a lot of American Indians.
California was never "theirs". The United States inherited perfectly valid "sea to sea" land claims from Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina and Virginia. When the Mexicans ran off the Spanish, we fairly reasserted those claims.
Will they teach "that" history in California schools?
3
posted on
08/24/2002 3:48:35 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: FreedomFriend
And of course the GOP is going to make this an issue in the November elections
4
posted on
08/24/2002 5:29:22 AM PDT
by
uncbob
To: FreedomFriend
Here is some more data for you:
Hispanic population growth from 1980 to 2000 in the following metropolitan areas exceeding 300%:
Raleigh,NC 1,180%
Atlanta 995%
Greensboro,NC 962%
Charlotte 962%
Orlando 859%
Las Vegas 753%
Nashville 630%
Fort Lauderdale 578%
Sarasota 538%
Portland 437%
Greenville,SC 397%
Washington D.C. 346%
Indianapolis 338%
Minn-St.Paul 331%
Fort Worth 325%
Tulsa 303%
Source: "Latino Growth in Metropolitan America: Changing Patterns, New Locations," Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. Article was in the Washington Post.
5
posted on
08/24/2002 6:07:06 AM PDT
by
blueriver
To: FreedomFriend
1990
Beige 0.0%-16.6% Hispanic
Yellow 16.7%-33.2% Hispanic
Green-Yellow- 33.4%-53.0% Hispanic
Olive Green- 53.3%-75.2% Hispanic
Forest Green- 75.5%-100.0% Hispanic
2000
Beige 0.0%-18.5% Hispanic
Yellow 18.6%-36.2% Hispanic
Green-Yellow 36.3%-55.6% Hispanic
Olive Green 55.7%-76.4% Hispanic
Forest Green 76.4%-98.4% Hispanic
But, the MAPS would look different if the PERCENTAGES HAD NOT CHANGED BETWEEN YEARS!!!!!
The population DENSITY could have grown in a decade and the MAPS would look EXACTLY the same!!!!!
The EYES make the judgement call in this thread - NOT the brain in calculating the data.........
Just like the colors on a weather MAP show rain density, really bad weather could be made to LOOK less severe by shifting the color change breakpoints on the intensity scale!
6
posted on
08/24/2002 6:46:26 AM PDT
by
Elsie
To: Free the USA; Helix; backhoe; Uncle Bill; Patriotman; Dogs in the field; Askel5; Joe Hadenuf; ...
ping
7
posted on
08/24/2002 7:44:33 AM PDT
by
madfly
To: FreedomFriend
Obviously the answer is to make Mexico the 52nd State. Are they slave or free?
Of course, there is always dual citizenship. That is approved for voting purposes.
8
posted on
08/24/2002 8:13:00 AM PDT
by
ex-snook
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Elsie
No, the brain and the eyes make the call. For some reason, some of the pictures are not showing up. I'll try to repost them.
The facts are that these are census tracts. If all the pictures are up, you can clearly see that some Census Tracts were in the beige or yellow colors in 1990, and ten years later the same tracts were in the yellow, yellow-green or olive green colors. Many of them have not grown in population, as their size has stayed the same. On the other hand, those areas where they have received more people in that ten year span reveal that the newcomers to those particular areas were primarily Hispanic. Thus, whether other groups fled or not really doesn't matter, as the Hispanic population percentage would go up either way. You can also see how many tracts were broken into two or three, particularly around Central Los Angeles. This represents a huge increase in population, and you'll also see that nearly zero of the tracts have turned in the direction of Hispanic to Non-Hispanic. Thus, with smaller tracts and increased percentages, this reveals that not only is the Hispanic population percentage increasing, but the shear numbers are huge.
To: blueriver
Hispanic population growth from 1980 to 2000 in the following metropolitan areas exceeding 300%: Raleigh,NC 1,180% Atlanta 995% Greensboro,NC 962% Charlotte 962% Orlando 859% Las Vegas 753% Nashville 630% Fort Lauderdale 578% Sarasota 538% Portland 437% Greenville,SC 397% Washington D.C. 346% Indianapolis 338% Minn-St.Paul 331% Fort Worth 325% Tulsa 303%
Hmm...And how long have we been saying, that this is not just a Kalifornia problem anymore?
To: FreedomFriend
Let me try this again.
The Key:
1990Beige 0.0%-16.6% Hispanic
Yellow 16.7%-33.2% Hispanic
Green-Yellow- 33.4%-53.0% Hispanic
Olive Green- 53.3%-75.2% Hispanic
Forest Green- 75.5%-100.0% Hispanic
2000Beige 0.0%-18.5% Hispanic
Yellow 18.6%-36.2% Hispanic
Green-Yellow 36.3%-55.6% Hispanic
Olive Green 55.7%-76.4% Hispanic
Forest Green 76.4%-98.4% Hispanic
Inland (Riverside/San Bernardino/Ontario)
1990
2000
Central/East Los Angeles(LA Downtown, Covina, Anaheim, Downey, Arcadia)
1990
2000
Southeast Los Angeles (Santa Ana, Irvine, Tustin, San Juan Capistrano)
1990
2000
West Los Angeles (LA Downtown, Carson, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica)
1990
2000
Northwest Los Angeles (San Fernando Valley/Burbank/Glendale)
1990
2000
Far West (Ventura/Oxnard/Camarillo/Thousand Oaks)
1990
2000
To: Paulie; TomGuy; Regulator; Reaganwuzthebest; Fish out of Water; Marine Inspector; ChaseR; ...
Guys, hopefully these images won't time out. Check them out. They're very interesting.
To: Drill Alaska
A picture is worth a thousand words.
To: FreedomFriend; Tancredo Fan
Sickening. We're being invaded, we all know it, and Bush sits there going, come on in!
To: grlfrnd
Did you check the newer pictures that I posted? Look carefully. Hey, you don't even need to look carefully. The differences among Census tracts in the years 1990 and 2000 are of a huge contrast. Furthermore, the key is offest a little bit between both decades, so it actuality mellows the invasion a bit.
To: FreedomFriend
Thanks for the fix on those. Notice that as the Lat/Hisp percentages increase, no counter trends of large areas of the population opening up; i.e. non-immigrant based population is evidently leaving the state as population number trends suggest and not just moving to the suburbs.
(A 1900-2000 time-lapse animated image would be very effective.)
To: FreedomFriend
Mexico owns Kalifornia, and many cities across the US, not to mention the politicians in those areas as well. Palestine is here.
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: FreedomFriend
Speaking English only is considered un-pc in this town. We're all supposed to know Spanish and give them our hard earned dollars.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 941-945 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson