Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sanitizing Islam
Jerusalem Post ^ | August 25 02 | Editorial

Posted on 08/25/2002 5:30:40 AM PDT by scratchgolfer

Sanitizing Islam

In Funtua, Nigeria, last week, a 30-year-old mother named Amina Lawal was sentenced to death by stoning by an Islamic court for "adultery," although in her case this means only having sex out of wedlock. The sentence, which Lawal has accepted as "the will of God," will be applied as soon as she is through breast-feeding. Around the same time, CNN aired an al-Qaida videotape showing a dog, in excruciating pain, succumbing to poison gas.

Meanwhile, the Fourth US Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the right of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to require this year's 3,500 freshmen to read Approaching the Koran: The Early Revelations, by Haverford College religious studies Prof. Michael Sells. The ruling came after the Virginia-based Family Policy Network, which ordinarily might be expected to encourage the use of religious textbooks in public school curricula, argued that the requirement violates provisions in the Constitution against state-sponsored promotion of religion.

According to Chancellor James Moeser, what gave rise to the assignment of Sells's book in the first place was the need, post-9-11, for America's young to better appreciate Islam. "The whole idea is that this is the first step toward understanding a culture we don't know anything about," he said.

Already, this follows on a trend. Last year, following the attacks, hundreds of students wore Islamic dress for a day "to prove their tolerance toward Islam," according to a report in The New York Times. Islamic-studies courses have become among the most popular on offer, and the university has moved to hire an Islamic-studies expert.

We join in applauding the university for its new focus. American ignorance about Islam paid no small part in leaving the country unprepared for the events of September 11. The CIA, for example, suffers from a serious dearth of Arabic speakers, and there has been little appreciation in the policy-making community of the trends and forces afoot in the Islamic world over the past decade, in part because so few people could so much as read an Arabic-language newspaper.

Yet it may be questioned whether the approach being taken at Chapel Hill and elsewhere in the US is the best one. Nowadays, the liberal desire to "understand" is often confused with the politically correct need to finesse and sanitize. And Sells's book, we fear, goes far toward accomplishing the latter.

"From what I knew from the news," the Times quotes freshman Mary Allison Lee as saying, "I would have perceived [Muslims] to be a violent people. So I see one thing on TV, and another in the book." Now, she says, "I'm not sure what to think." Lee may be forgiven her confusion. "Approaching the Koran," offers translations of, and commentary on, 35 early suras.

But it does not touch on Islamic notions of holy war, or Islamic ideas about the justness of killing "infidels," from which too many of today's Muslims draw inspiration. As a result, students are left with a scant appreciation of Islamic culture, all the while thinking they've had their minds opened.

For our money, if the UNC really had wanted to offer its freshman a sophisticated picture of the forces that have shaped contemporary Islam, they would have done better to assign Bernard Lewis's What Went Wrong?, or perhaps Fouad Ajami's Dream Palace of the Arabs. Both works scholarly, engaging and relevant offer masterly overviews of the cultural forces that led directly to September 11.

Today, every military regime in the world but one is in a Muslim country. Two-thirds of the world's political prisoners are held in Muslim countries. Eighty percent of executions carried out each year take place in Muslim countries. No Muslim countries save Turkey and Bangladesh are democratic.

There is an urgent need in the West to understand why all this is, and universities could have a vital role to play in achieving it. By assigning Sells's book, all that Chapel Hill has managed to do is whitewash reality in the name of raising awareness. For the likes of an Amina Lawal, this will offer little solace.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/25/2002 5:30:40 AM PDT by scratchgolfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scratchgolfer
God wants us to stone you to death it's for your own good... Am I the only one that sees something wrong with this kind of thinking?
2 posted on 08/25/2002 5:34:06 AM PDT by scab4faa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scratchgolfer
Anything and everything to do with the koran and mohammad is a lie. Forcing americans to accept muslim as a peaceful religion is part of the socialist agenda for america to destroy all ties to the name of Jesus Christ.
3 posted on 08/25/2002 5:35:59 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scratchgolfer
In Funtua, Nigeria, last week, a 30-year-old mother named Amina Lawal was sentenced to death by stoning by an Islamic court for "adultery," although in her case this means only having sex out of wedlock. The sentence, which Lawal has accepted as "the will of God," will be applied as soon as she is through breast-feeding. Around the same time, CNN aired an al-Qaida videotape showing a dog, in excruciating pain, succumbing to poison gas.

But Christians killed "witches" back in the 1600's! <\sarcasm>

4 posted on 08/25/2002 5:36:59 AM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scratchgolfer
Islamic justice means killing the VICTIM of rape.
In extramartial affairs, men go free and the women are conveniently killed.

The Islamic idea of American urban renewal:

from Islam to American: from The Religion of Peace(TM)

5 posted on 08/25/2002 5:37:31 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scratchgolfer
I can see what would have happened if this attitude had prevailed in 1941.

We would have tried to understand why the Japanese bombed us. We would have made sure that Japanese culture classes would be in every school and we would have had classes on the Shinto religion.

In the meantime we would have tried to understand those Nazis in Germany and would have held german appreciation week to try to be more understanding of german culture etc..

The world has gone mad. I can't for the life of me figure out how I have remained sane.

I am reminded of those lines from the great Irish poet Yeats.

Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold

6 posted on 08/25/2002 5:50:06 AM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scab4faa
Americans are naive to the fact that radical Muslims are vicious, dangerous animals and I got that information from a woman at work who was born and raised in Indonesia. The first-hand stories she told me about how these animals kill and destroy would curl your hair. Professors and district attorneys (such as the one in San Francisco who confuses hate speech (whatever that is) with free speech) are only dupes and useful idiots to radical Islamists. It is not a peaceful religion and Americans had better wake up to that fact.
7 posted on 08/25/2002 5:52:44 AM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
The world has gone mad. I can't for the life of me figure out how I have remained sane.

I'm one step ahead of you buddy.

It was too hard keeping up the struggle.

Now I have three squares a day, a nice padded cell, and iron bars on the window, which Dr. al-Zawahiri tells me is to keep the bad men out.

Salaam,

tictoc

8 posted on 08/25/2002 5:56:50 AM PDT by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
From the later works of mohammed:

From the koran, sura 9:29
Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

From the hadith:

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 59, Number 176:
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar:
Allah's Apostle said, "You (i.e. Muslims) will fight wi the Jews till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray them) saying, 'O 'Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.'"

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 362:
Narrated Ibn Umar:
Bani An-Nadir and Bani Quraiza fought (against the Prophet violating their peace treaty), so the Prophet exiled Bani An-Nadir and allowed Bani Quraiza to remain at their places (in Medina) taking nothing from them till they fought against the Prophet again) . He then killed their men and distributed their women, children and property among the Muslims, but some of them came to the Prophet and he granted them safety, and they embraced Islam. He exiled all the Jews from Medina. They were the Jews of Bani Qainuqa', the tribe of 'Abdullah bin Salam and the Jews of Bani Haritha and all the other Jews of Medina.

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 369:
Narrated Jabir Abdullah:
Allah's messenger said "Who is willing to kill Ka`b bin al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His apostle?" Thereupon Maslama got up saying, "O Allah's messenger! Would you like that I kill him?" The prophet said, "Yes". Maslama said, "Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Ka`b). The prophet said, "You may say it."

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/059.sbt.html#005.059.369

What where these man's crimes that he had to pay for his life? He vocally supported the Meccans against mohammed and he said mohammed was not a prophet. Such is punishment for speaking out against the prophet of the religion of peace!
9 posted on 08/25/2002 6:03:16 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scratchgolfer
It is insane to judge a religion in isolation from the prevailing ethos -- the modes of conduct -- of its adherents. As James Lileks wrote recently, it's rather difficult to imagine Christian fundamentalists hijacking an airliner and ramming it into an office tower in Malaysia.

For further thoughts, please see:

Present Enemies, Future Wars

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

10 posted on 08/25/2002 6:33:44 AM PDT by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scab4faa
"I've sentenced boys your age to the gas chamber. I...didn't want to do it. But I felt I owed it to them"

Judge Smaels.
11 posted on 08/25/2002 7:10:47 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ladylib
Even history does not support Islam, and it is just a lie and should not be taught. Muhammed wanted to be known as "Greater than Jesus Christ", and he taught that Jesus will come, and then follow him. What blasphemy!
12 posted on 08/25/2002 11:59:09 AM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: scratchgolfer
Last year, following the attacks, hundreds of students wore Islamic dress for a day "to prove their tolerance toward Islam," according to a report in The New York Times.

That's a good start, but they ought to have the girls sit in a seperate classroom, wear burkas, and undergo genital mutilation to get an even better understanding of Islam.

13 posted on 08/25/2002 12:04:26 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"Why We FighT!"
14 posted on 08/25/2002 2:28:30 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson