Posted on 08/25/2002 12:50:21 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
You're still wrong.
But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.....
Perhaps you indeed are so intellegent that you know better than I, just what "my" agenda is.
ok genius, enlighten us.
I knew ALL of those things because I bothered to find out, instead of counting on the media to do it for me. The White House web site has all the information available, and all you have to do is go there and READ it. Instead, Mr. Weyrich whines, and when it is pointed out to him, he blames the White House for the media black-out. What a dolt!
Those of us who are Bush supporters have been sending e-mails, talking to people, and flooding radio call-ins with the message. But Mr. Weyrich didn't see this on NBC, so he thinks nothing has been done.
Contrary to his opinion, most of the cultural conservatives have this information through other sources, and will show up at the polls in November.
And, I stand by my opinion posted the other night. A lot of the unappeasables are merely plants here to stir up trouble and cause doubt among the troops. I am done being polite to them.
Ask not what Bush has done for conservatives but what have conservatives done for Bush ;-)
We shouldn't "put all our eggs in one basket" in hoping politicians will advance our agendas. Politicians (includes those we like as well as those we don't) are about one thing: getting elected.
Perhaps some recent historical perspective will help. Taking all presidential administrations since WWII, conservatives can probably agree that Reagan's was the "best" (as far as its conservative leanings) and LBJ's was the "worst".
That said - let's analyze a little further. As conservatives, we should all oppose bigger government. Has the size of government IN ANY ADMINISTRATION been reduced? The answer is no. Perhaps the RATE of growth has certainly been smaller in a Reagan vs. LBJ administration, but it has grown nonetheless.
How about judicial appointments? Well, our "friends" have let us down there, too. Earl Warren was appointed by Ike; and Nixon was responsible for some of the worst Supreme Court justices ever. And Bush I gave us Souter.
My point is simply this: I don't know exactly what it is going to take to return us to a Constitutional Republic, but I do know it's going to take more than getting "our man" elected president.
News Flash.....we are not Jews looking for the holy land, nor is GWB the Almighty Lord, no matter how much you may want him to be.
I've often wondered how come republicrats need a majority in both houses (AND the presidency to boot) to pass their supposed agenda, yet the democans seem to never have any problems passing their socialist agenda.
Could it be that the agenda of both parties is to expand the government?
The Cherokee side of my family stopped accepting wompum, trinkets and beads for things of real value long ago.
He is your typical yellow-belly bootlicker. Just be satisfied in the fact that Samuel Adams was speaking of people such as Dane when he made the following statement:
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." -- Samuel Adams 1776. Cheers!
Is it the Cherokee in you that makes you want to vote for Tony "Pablo Escobar" Sanchez for governor of Texas?
You my-way-or-the-highway types are never happy, because you don't know or don't care that a Constitutional Republic involves politics.
With the country pretty well split down the middle ideologically, you guys are going to miserable for a very long time.
I think you may have stumbled onto something here. But let's keep it quiet, a lot of freepers will be pissed off at you if they find out.
I understand a Republic is politics, but politics is suppose to be two competing ideals, it's not that anymore. Now it is the same idea and the same destination, it's just a matter of do you want to take the bus or fly.
Bush has said he is for open borders from here to the tip of S. America, is there something about that that is escaping you? It's fine, if you agree with that, vote for him, I won't.
I'm not saying I will never vote for a Republican again, just not this Republican with this agenda. And the sooner the Party gets the message the better off people like me will be, and if we are not better off, we can't be worse off. At least those that forgive anything Republican will be back on their toes fighting the good fight.
I also want to see the evidence about the state of Iraq's nuke program before we go in there, and have a clearer statement of exactly what the causa belli (sp) is. That is a much bigger issue of course.
I implore all to vote in November. Bush isn't running, his policies are not on the ballot - but the future direction of this country, the appointment of constitution-loving judges, and victory over terrorism are.
Oh yes, and support Jay Wolfe, candidate for Senate in West Virginia, with your money and vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.