Skip to comments.
Multiculturalism and the Fall of Western Civilization
The Clash of Civilizations
| 2002
| Samuel P. Huntington
Posted on 08/25/2002 3:24:49 PM PDT by Noumenon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator
To: Noumenon
Thanks for the article and your thoughtful comments.
42
posted on
08/26/2002 6:13:34 PM PDT
by
TopQuark
To: Noumenon
Fantastic, thanks for posting this.
To: Ohioan
From the essay that you linked:
Civilizations rise and fall, not on the backs of an undifferentiated humanity, but on the ingenuity, heroism, determination and focus of specific people--dynamic and directed individuals--men and women well aware of who they are and whence they came. No civilization can allow social engineers and theorists to tamper with the dynamics that built and sustained it and not expect to pay a terrible price.
The writer gets it.
44
posted on
08/26/2002 7:11:01 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
To: esopman
Such a 'wake-up call from Hell' would be a mercy, a severe mercy. Yes, it would. Better now than later - when it's far too late. If history teaches us anything at all, it is that civilizations might vary according to their achievements, but all have their rise, their zenith and their nadir. We've got no special dispensation from the consequences of some very bad ideas...
45
posted on
08/26/2002 7:15:10 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
To: tpaine
A fundamentalist's unyielding adherence to rigid doctrinal and ideological positions may find expression in his or her social and political, as well as religious, attitudes. Hey tpaine... You mean like adherence to the idea that some stuff is right and some stuff is wrong?
To: Noumenon
Thanks for the article and your thoughtful comments.
47
posted on
08/26/2002 8:17:47 PM PDT
by
TopQuark
To: yendu bwam
"A fundamentalist's unyielding adherence to rigid doctrinal and ideological positions may find expression in his or her social and political, as well as religious, attitudes."
Hey tpaine... You mean like adherence to the idea that some stuff is right and some stuff is wrong? - YBwam
_________________________________
Yep. It's the fanatical fundamentalist, those that are firmly convinced that their cause is righteous, and MUST prevail:
"Violent fundamentalists are those who believe that the "rightness" of their cause justifies even the most heinous of crimes. They are right, and others have no rights. Whether "religious" and secular, down through the ages violent fundamentalists have been responsible for terrible atrocities--crusaders slaughtering Muslims, inquisitors torturing heretics, Nazis gassing Jews, communists annihilating counterrevolutionaries, capitalists tyrannizing the poor."
48
posted on
08/26/2002 8:43:56 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: Noumenon
For later reading.
49
posted on
08/26/2002 8:51:59 PM PDT
by
rdb3
To: TopQuark
You're quite welcome.
S. P. Huntington bump
50
posted on
08/26/2002 8:55:17 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
To: tpaine
Hey tpaine... You mean like adherence to the idea that some stuff is right and some stuff is wrong? - YBwam _________________________________ Yep. It's the fanatical fundamentalist, those that are firmly convinced that their cause is righteous, and MUST prevail: "Violent fundamentalists are those who believe that the "rightness" of their cause justifies even the most heinous of crimes. They are right, and others have no rights. Whether "religious" and secular, down through the ages violent fundamentalists have been responsible for terrible atrocities--crusaders slaughtering Muslims, inquisitors torturing heretics, Nazis gassing Jews, communists annihilating counterrevolutionaries, capitalists tyrannizing the poor." Well, since you think some things are 'atrocities', you also have your idea of what is right and what is wrong. Guess that makes you a fundamentalist too.
To: yendu bwam
Yep. It's the fanatical fundamentalist, those that are firmly convinced that their cause is righteous, and MUST prevail:
"Violent fundamentalists are those who believe that the "rightness" of their cause justifies even the most heinous of crimes. They are right, and others have no rights. Whether "religious" and secular, down through the ages violent fundamentalists have been responsible for terrible atrocities--crusaders slaughtering Muslims, inquisitors torturing heretics, Nazis gassing Jews, communists annihilating counterrevolutionaries, capitalists tyrannizing the poor."
___________________________________
Well, since you think some things are 'atrocities', you also have your idea of what is right and what is wrong. Guess that makes you a fundamentalist too. -- YB
___________________________________
Not at all. -- I am not urging that governments or groups take action to enforce my views of right/wrong on my peers, counter to the rule of constitutional law.
Fanatical fundamentlists do exactly that. - They seem incapable of 'live & let live'. They MUST be their brothers keeper.
Their wish to use force is the problem, and can easily become an 'atrocity'.
52
posted on
08/27/2002 9:18:38 AM PDT
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
Let's go back, Tpaine. I began on this thread by decrying things like the sexual abuse of teenage boys in the Catholic Church and fatherless families. You responded with a post on fundamentalism. I asked if believing in right and wrong makes you a fundamentalist. You said yes, but that you yourself were not (even though you have a notion of right and wrong). You said force had to be involved. I never mentioned forcing anyone to do anything. So what is the point of your fundamentalist post?
To: yendu bwam
I believe my point was made, in that, - hopefully, the post made you think about your fundamentalism, and the role force has historically played in the fundamentalist philosophy.
-- Thanks.
54
posted on
08/27/2002 1:37:14 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
I believe my point was made, in that, - hopefully, the post made you think about your fundamentalism, and the role force has historically played in the fundamentalist philosophy. I'm not a fundamentalist - even by your own definition. I haven't tried to force anything on you at all.
To: Noumenon
The clash between the multiculturalists and the defenders of Western civilization and the American Creed is, in James Kurth's phrase, "the real clash" within the American segment of Western civilization. If only there were a "clash" I'd be there with bells on. As far as I can see, its been one long retreat.
Take a principled stand at your own peril. As Pat Buchanan found out in '92, the protruding nail gets pounded down.
56
posted on
08/27/2002 2:23:48 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Cacique; firebrand; Dutchy; rmlew; StarFan; Coleus; RaceBannon; nutmeg
Good read ping!
To: skeeter
Take a principled stand at your own peril. Yep - it's cost me jobs and 'friends' that I'm better off without. But you know what - I can look myself in the mirror at the end of each day and not have to avert my eyes.
58
posted on
08/27/2002 3:03:04 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
To: Black Agnes
Martin van Creveld bump.
59
posted on
08/28/2002 7:59:11 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
To: Noumenon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson