Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Multiculturalism and the Fall of Western Civilization
The Clash of Civilizations | 2002 | Samuel P. Huntington

Posted on 08/25/2002 3:24:49 PM PDT by Noumenon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Noumenon
Thanks for the article and your thoughtful comments.
42 posted on 08/26/2002 6:13:34 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Fantastic, thanks for posting this.
43 posted on 08/26/2002 6:29:05 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
From the essay that you linked:

Civilizations rise and fall, not on the backs of an undifferentiated humanity, but on the ingenuity, heroism, determination and focus of specific people--dynamic and directed individuals--men and women well aware of who they are and whence they came. No civilization can allow social engineers and theorists to tamper with the dynamics that built and sustained it and not expect to pay a terrible price.
The writer gets it.
44 posted on 08/26/2002 7:11:01 PM PDT by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: esopman
Such a 'wake-up call from Hell' would be a mercy, a severe mercy.

Yes, it would. Better now than later - when it's far too late. If history teaches us anything at all, it is that civilizations might vary according to their achievements, but all have their rise, their zenith and their nadir. We've got no special dispensation from the consequences of some very bad ideas...

45 posted on 08/26/2002 7:15:10 PM PDT by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
A fundamentalist's unyielding adherence to rigid doctrinal and ideological positions may find expression in his or her social and political, as well as religious, attitudes.

Hey tpaine... You mean like adherence to the idea that some stuff is right and some stuff is wrong?

46 posted on 08/26/2002 8:12:07 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Thanks for the article and your thoughtful comments.
47 posted on 08/26/2002 8:17:47 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam

"A fundamentalist's unyielding adherence to rigid doctrinal and ideological positions may find expression in his or her social and political, as well as religious, attitudes."

Hey tpaine... You mean like adherence to the idea that some stuff is right and some stuff is wrong? - YBwam
_________________________________

Yep. It's the fanatical fundamentalist, those that are firmly convinced that their cause is righteous, and MUST prevail:

"Violent fundamentalists are those who believe that the "rightness" of their cause justifies even the most heinous of crimes. They are right, and others have no rights. Whether "religious" and secular, down through the ages violent fundamentalists have been responsible for terrible atrocities--crusaders slaughtering Muslims, inquisitors torturing heretics, Nazis gassing Jews, communists annihilating counterrevolutionaries, capitalists tyrannizing the poor."
48 posted on 08/26/2002 8:43:56 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
For later reading.
49 posted on 08/26/2002 8:51:59 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
You're quite welcome.

S. P. Huntington bump
50 posted on 08/26/2002 8:55:17 PM PDT by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Hey tpaine... You mean like adherence to the idea that some stuff is right and some stuff is wrong? - YBwam _________________________________ Yep. It's the fanatical fundamentalist, those that are firmly convinced that their cause is righteous, and MUST prevail: "Violent fundamentalists are those who believe that the "rightness" of their cause justifies even the most heinous of crimes. They are right, and others have no rights. Whether "religious" and secular, down through the ages violent fundamentalists have been responsible for terrible atrocities--crusaders slaughtering Muslims, inquisitors torturing heretics, Nazis gassing Jews, communists annihilating counterrevolutionaries, capitalists tyrannizing the poor."

Well, since you think some things are 'atrocities', you also have your idea of what is right and what is wrong. Guess that makes you a fundamentalist too.

51 posted on 08/27/2002 5:52:51 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
Yep. It's the fanatical fundamentalist, those that are firmly convinced that their cause is righteous, and MUST prevail:
"Violent fundamentalists are those who believe that the "rightness" of their cause justifies even the most heinous of crimes. They are right, and others have no rights. Whether "religious" and secular, down through the ages violent fundamentalists have been responsible for terrible atrocities--crusaders slaughtering Muslims, inquisitors torturing heretics, Nazis gassing Jews, communists annihilating counterrevolutionaries, capitalists tyrannizing the poor."
___________________________________

Well, since you think some things are 'atrocities', you also have your idea of what is right and what is wrong. Guess that makes you a fundamentalist too. -- YB
___________________________________

Not at all. -- I am not urging that governments or groups take action to enforce my views of right/wrong on my peers, counter to the rule of constitutional law.
Fanatical fundamentlists do exactly that. - They seem incapable of 'live & let live'. They MUST be their brothers keeper.
Their wish to use force is the problem, and can easily become an 'atrocity'.
52 posted on 08/27/2002 9:18:38 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Let's go back, Tpaine. I began on this thread by decrying things like the sexual abuse of teenage boys in the Catholic Church and fatherless families. You responded with a post on fundamentalism. I asked if believing in right and wrong makes you a fundamentalist. You said yes, but that you yourself were not (even though you have a notion of right and wrong). You said force had to be involved. I never mentioned forcing anyone to do anything. So what is the point of your fundamentalist post?
53 posted on 08/27/2002 9:55:48 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
I believe my point was made, in that, - hopefully, the post made you think about your fundamentalism, and the role force has historically played in the fundamentalist philosophy.

-- Thanks.
54 posted on 08/27/2002 1:37:14 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
I believe my point was made, in that, - hopefully, the post made you think about your fundamentalism, and the role force has historically played in the fundamentalist philosophy.

I'm not a fundamentalist - even by your own definition. I haven't tried to force anything on you at all.

55 posted on 08/27/2002 2:12:19 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
The clash between the multiculturalists and the defenders of Western civilization and the American Creed is, in James Kurth's phrase, "the real clash" within the American segment of Western civilization.

If only there were a "clash" I'd be there with bells on. As far as I can see, its been one long retreat.

Take a principled stand at your own peril. As Pat Buchanan found out in '92, the protruding nail gets pounded down.

56 posted on 08/27/2002 2:23:48 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique; firebrand; Dutchy; rmlew; StarFan; Coleus; RaceBannon; nutmeg
Good read ping!
57 posted on 08/27/2002 2:32:04 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Take a principled stand at your own peril.

Yep - it's cost me jobs and 'friends' that I'm better off without. But you know what - I can look myself in the mirror at the end of each day and not have to avert my eyes.

58 posted on 08/27/2002 3:03:04 PM PDT by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Martin van Creveld bump.
59 posted on 08/28/2002 7:59:11 PM PDT by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

60 posted on 08/29/2002 6:26:37 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson