Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another African 'Drought'
Sierra Times ^ | 08-22-02 | Vin Suprynowicz

Posted on 08/26/2002 5:03:48 AM PDT by Boonie Rat

Another African 'Drought'

By Vin Suprynowicz

Published 08. 22. 02 at 20:23 Sierra Time

It's been almost a year since the United States pulled out of the United Nations conference against "racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance" in Durban, South Africa.

Dominated by such renowned champions of human rights as Fidel Castro, Yasser Arafat, and Algerian president Abdelaziz Bouteflicka, the conference demonstrated -- for those who hadn't already caught on -- that "The U.N. has, in effect, become a union shop for the Third World, most Islamic countries and the few remaining communist regimes," columnist Barbara Amiel noted at the time in London's Daily Telegraph.

In fact, the real two-part agenda of the conference was to condemn Israel for continuing to exist (which constitutes "racism" against the Arabs who have tried to conquer the tiny nation three times -- or is it four, now -- since 1948) and to demand reparations payable by Europe and America to the modern nations of Africa for the slave trade (which, of course, depended on the complicity of African sellers in the first place, and was ended by 19th century abolitionist movements based not in Africa, but in Europe and the United States.)

"It is ludicrous for countries that still practise xenophobic intolerance, from Zimbabwe to Syria, to condemn the West, which not only stopped such practices but provided the sole basis for the Third World's idea that these things are wrong," Ms. Amiel noted. "If the First World hadn't discovered that xenophobia was bad, would the Third World know it?"

But the crowning absurdity of the South African conference on "racism" had to be the stage it provided for Robert Mugabe, permanent thug-in-chief of the nation of Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) to address the topic "landlessness as a form of racism."

Thoroughly in keeping with the underlying theme that only rich folks from the First World can be "racists" (there were no words of condemnation for African nations like Sudan -- the only places in the world where chattel slavery is known to persist) what Mr. Mugabe clearly meant was that it was "racist" for farms in his country to continue under the ownership of white families whose ancestors settled and developed them more than a century ago, while the remedy for such "racism" was for Mr. Mugabe's thugs to seize them from the owners and "redistribute" them to his political cronies -- who all happen to be black.

Well, Mr. Mugabe has now had a chance to put his widely applauded plan of racial justice into effect. How's it working out?

After more than two years of what is politely dubbed "political unrest," during which 186 Mugabe opponents (including 11 white farmers) were killed, the government finally targeted 95 percent of white-owned land for "redistribution," ordering 2,900 white farmers off their land in a first wave of mass evictions on Aug. 8.

About 60 percent refused to comply, and nearly 200 have been arrested in the past week, facing fines and up to two years in jail for contesting the legality of their eviction orders. Despite government promises, most farmers received no compensation.

Tuesday, Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa urged black settlers allocated land on contested farms to move onto them, despite the court challenges.

That statement and bail terms that forbid many arrested farmers from living on their land while awaiting trial indicate the fix is in: the bail conditions are "a prejudgment of the validity" of the eviction orders, warns David Hasluck, director of the Commercial Farmers Union, who represents the white farmers.

Many now plan to leave the country.

"We tried to coexist and cooperate but it didn't work," Roy Fuller, 60, told Angus Shaw of The Associated Press, recalling threats and intimidation from ruling party militants who have already occupied parts of his land in the Selous district for the past two years.

Fuller is abandoning his 2,900 acre farm -- he will move to neighboring South Africa to work on a vineyard. Sixty thousand dollars worth of tobacco in his fields will probably rot. His 130 head of beef and dairy cattle were moved to a neighbor's land, where "They will have to be sold or slaughtered; there isn't enough grazing for them." The farm's 70 black employees and their families will eventually have to leave, whereupon they face "a gloomy fate," reports The AP. "Local officials asked (Fuller) to pay them severance packages."

The land seizures have disrupted farm operations, causing widespread food shortages that relief groups say threaten half of Zimbabwe's 12.5 million people. Despite the shortage, white farmers are being forced to abandon crops -- including irrigated wheat -- that need constant attention, says Hasluck of the Farmers Union.

"By the time they go to court throughout September, the crops will be dead, exacerbating an already critical food situation."

Which will bring more calls for African aid from the First World, of course.

And to what will the United Nations attribute blame for this developing crisis? They've already let the cat out of the bag, actually:

"Drought."


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/26/2002 5:03:48 AM PDT by Boonie Rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
Marshal Fritz once did a riff on this constant use of fictitious "droughts" to excuse famines in Marxist countries. The way he put it, it proves one of two things. Either these folks are playing a little loosely with the truth, or there is a God, and He doesn't like Communism.

Maybe both.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

2 posted on 08/26/2002 5:27:27 AM PDT by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
So sad to see South Africa issue a call for help from the "developed world." They have so much in the way of natural resources.
3 posted on 08/26/2002 5:28:17 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
OK, So let me get this straight. Mr Mugabe kicks the "White" farmers off of the land that they have farmed for decades and in some cases the family has farmed it for over a century. The "White" farmers employed "blacks" to work on the farm. Mr. Mugabe gives control and ownership of the farms to displaced "Blacks" who are incapable of producing anything that can be called food from the farms. Therefore, We now have a situation where the United States and the rest of the developed world will have to step in and provide food to the "Blacks" that now have ownership of the farms. Great, just great.
4 posted on 08/26/2002 6:18:02 AM PDT by sharkdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkdiver
By Jove, I Think You've Got It!! And by the way the local officials asked the white farmers, whose land has been stolen, to pay their black farm workers severance packages.

Boonie Rat

MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66

5 posted on 08/26/2002 6:34:11 AM PDT by Boonie Rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
If you were Muslim wouldn't your ask which arm or leg you would like severed?
6 posted on 08/26/2002 6:47:02 AM PDT by sharkdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson