To: maquiladora
I read in an earlier report that there were 35 sorties on this strike. That seems a lot compared to what has been reportedly destroyed. Is there more to this story? (35 sorties?)
16 posted on
08/27/2002 8:43:34 AM PDT by
blam
To: blam
That was what I read, maybe it was a deeply hardened site and we wanted to make sure!!
But I thought that was a report from the Iraqi side and maybe they wanted to elevate the size as a morale booster. Would be nice to hear from Rumsfeld as to more details!
To: blam; Miss Marple; eastforker; cmsgop
blam can you find a link to that story???
See blam's post # 16...
48 posted on
08/27/2002 1:16:02 PM PDT by
Dog
To: blam
That seems a lot compared to what has been reportedly destroyed. Is there more to this story? (35 sorties?) Perhaps some of the target was underground, and surveillance was used to target subsequent missions as the target was... ahhh, "opened up to full view." In a manner of speaking.
(steely)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson