Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can People be 'Out' in Your Newsroom?
poynter.org ^ | 8/27/2 | Lillian Rae Dunlap, Ph.D.

Posted on 8/27/2002, 4:33:34 PM by NativeNewYorker

Can the gay and lesbian journalists on your staff be open?

Don't get me wrong. All gay and lesbian journalists don't want to be "out" at work. For some, it's too personal.

But for those who want to be out, is there a welcoming environment for them in your newsroom?

Ninety-two percent of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) print journalists and 87 percent of broadcast journalists said that they were out in their newsrooms.

The study of 363 journalists was conducted by the USC Annenberg School for Communication and the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA) in 2000 to mark the tenth anniversary of a similar study. The number of "out" journalists in the second study represents a big increase over the earlier one.

Out or not, gay and lesbian colleagues bring talent and life experience to your newsroom and your newsgathering. You can benefit from both and enhance your workplace environment at the same time. Here are some suggestions inspired by the survey:

Show a commitment to fairness in the workplace regardless of sexual orientation. Be sure that people understand your decision process.

Use inclusive language in your conversations with the staff. Include the term 'partner' along with 'spouse' or 'significant other.'

Show a commitment to domestic partnership benefits. It shows that your definition of family includes partners.

Let the staff know that jokes, slurs, and other anti-gay behavior have no place in the organization.

Researchers for the NLGJA study were pleased about the high percentage of respondents who felt they could be out in their newsrooms. But, they noted the high number of anti-gay sentiments reported in some of these same newsrooms.

"Derogatory slurs by colleagues are still heard in the workplace at a surprisingly high rate," the researchers said.

"Nearly half of broadcast respondents reported hearing or experiencing slurs."

Such slurs can seriously undermine your other efforts to provide a welcoming environment for LGBT and other minority journalists. Here are some suggestions to consider:

1. Let your staff know that you value diversity in staffing and news content and that diversity includes LGBT people.

2. Consult LGBT journalists about issues including, but not limited to, traditionally "gay issues" such as stories about AIDS, gay pride week, or homosexuality.

3. Provide opportunities for the entire staff to learn more about LGBT people. Materials are available on the NLGJA website, or in magazines or newspapers that include information for and about gays and lesbians.

Pamela Strother, executive director of NLGJA, suggests that a recent New York Times announcement sent an important message to the LGBT community and journalists. Beginning in September, the Times will print the announcements of same-sex marriages, holy unions, and commitment ceremonies. (See Bob Steele's Aug. 22 Talk About Ethics essay.)

Strother says that the Times isn't the first paper to do this. It follows several papers including The Miami Herald, The San Jose Mercury News, the Minneapolis Star Tribune and The Washington Post. But the Times, with its 1.2 million readers, has the largest circulation.

There's one other significant difference, according to Strother. Unlike The Washington Post, The New York Times will print the paid announcements of same-sex unions next to the heterosexual marriage announcements.

"We have to pay The Washington Post to appear on a different page," she says. "The New York Times is offering us equal treatment on the same page."

Equal treatment, in the news and in the newsroom. That's what your gay and lesbian staff members are looking for from you.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: media

Lillian Rae Dunlap, Ph.D.

1 posted on 8/27/2002, 4:33:34 PM by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker; aculeus; Orual; general_re
Ninety-two percent of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) print journalists and 87 percent of broadcast journalists said that they were out in their newsrooms.

Why WOULDN'T they come out? It's a career-enhancing move.

2 posted on 8/27/2002, 4:36:30 PM by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Let's see now....at the Washington Post and the Dallas Morning News, being an "out" gay is worth at least a 10 percent raise, if not more, and they pay you to cover the gay community; future salary and bonuses dependent upon how badly you manage to gross out and appall the straight readership. I think the New York Times has a similar program.
3 posted on 8/27/2002, 4:37:06 PM by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

Helen Thomas

4 posted on 8/27/2002, 4:38:18 PM by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
They ought to be "out" (of work, that is, along with the other moral degenerates of the age.)
5 posted on 8/27/2002, 4:41:36 PM by RISU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus; general_re
Why WOULDN'T they come out? It's a career-enhancing move.


Career-enhancing, yes, and after cosmetic-enchancing surgery.

6 posted on 8/27/2002, 4:54:56 PM by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
I thought this article would be about conservative journalists.
7 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:04:24 PM by VoiceOfBruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker; Orual; dighton; general_re
Andrew Sullivan came out to the New York Times ... as a fiesty conservative Catholic homosexual ... and was banned by management.

Guess which three of his attributes ticked off William Randolph Raines?
8 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:04:30 PM by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Guess which three of his attributes ticked off William Randolph Raines?

I'm torn between "conservative" and "Catholic". I'll guess Catholic.

9 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:07:09 PM by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Oops, you didn't say which of the three, you said which three. Mea culpa.
10 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:08:12 PM by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
PUKEbbbbBARF

FMCDH

11 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:09:15 PM by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orual
Who are those critters?
12 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:11:51 PM by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
The more courageous move would be to "out" yourself as a conservative in the media.
13 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:12:02 PM by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
No trick questions. I'm barely able to read.
14 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:13:30 PM by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
The San Francisco Comicle probably has the same program.
15 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:14:14 PM by vikingcelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Michael (and Mayor) Bloomberg and Liz Smith.
16 posted on 8/27/2002, 5:15:26 PM by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
The more courageous move would be to "out" yourself as a conservative in the media.

Bingo.

17 posted on 8/27/2002, 7:27:08 PM by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson