Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's ours without a majority (Israeli writer on demographics and democracy)
Ha'aretz ^ | August 28, 2002 | Noam Arnon

Posted on 08/28/2002 2:24:29 AM PDT by mmmmmmmm....... donuts

Major General Uzi Dayan's forecast that the Jewish majority in Israel will be eroded within 18 years was received by the left wing like a parched traveler in the desert welcomes cold water. After all the left's idyllic predictions and illusions about a new Middle East vanished in a smoke cloud of terror, members of this camp needed to find some reason to warrant giving parts of Eretz Israel to Arafat and his cohorts.

And now they've got it - a demographic demon threatens us. We're about to lose a Jewish majority. If we don't give Judea and Samaria away immediately, the Arabs will become a majority between the Jordan River and the sea, and "the state of Israel will lose its Jewish character."

By now, experience and common sense should have taught us to disbelieve absolutely everything preached by the architects of the Oslo process. Everything they've brought us up to now has turned out to be a colossal tragedy. All of their forecasts have been fateful mistakes. But when the forecast in question is "scientific," there are liable to be those who relate to its estimates as facts, and include the prediction as a component in their line of reasoning.

First, "demographic facts" should be treated with outright skepticism. Such warnings have been issued in the past, and have mostly proved false. The percentage of Arabs in Israel has not grown significantly in recent decades - but I want to address this question from a very different angle.

For a well-rooted Jew living in Eretz Israel by dint of historic right, the issue raised by Dayan does not constitute a problem. Our right to Eretz Israel and our right to establish a sovereign national entity on it does not depend on our numbers, and on whether we are a majority or a minority. This land was our country when we were a small, isolated minority.

Five hundred or a thousand years ago, a few thousand Jews lived in the country. In 1919, the League of Nations recognized the Jewish people's right to the land, without any connection to their number in it (tens of thousands). In 1948, 600,000 Jews lived in the country. The numerical issue was never brought up as an element determining the Jewish people's connection to or belonging in the country.

Hence, for us it doesn't matter whether there are more Jews or Arabs here. Of course, we would prefer it if there are a majority of Jews here. But no matter, the Jewish people will retain their right to the country.

By definition the state of Israel was founded as a Jewish state. The regime constituted in it is democratic in character, but its essence is Jewish. And if there is a contradiction between this essence and the character of the government, it is clear that the essence takes precedence, and that steps are to be taken to prevent damage or changes to this Jewish essence. Democracy cannot to be exploited to destroy the Jewish state.

Legislators should settle this point in clear, categorical terms, without any qualms of conscience or moral compunction. Absolute justice holds that the state of Israel is, and has always been, the only Jewish state, and this country has been solely that of the Jewish people. That's how things have been defined, and that's how they will remain. Whoever wants a different state should look for it somewhere else.

The strange and disturbing thing is that those who identify with the state of Israel as a democracy bound to human rights do their utmost to prevent the Jewish majority from guaranteeing its rights and numerical advantage. They raise small families (if they have children at all); they prevent any measure giving preference to the growth of the Jewish population and rebuilding it after the Holocaust; they fight against encouraging Jewish births and support for army veterans; they campaign to give settlement rights to Arabs in Jewish communities.

In educational and cultural spheres the democracy addicts - who are so worried about the "Jewish character of the state of Israel" - destroy the Jewish infrastructure of the school system, weaken Jewish identity and expressions of this identity in the media and in public life, encourage assimilation and the eradication of the Jewish demographic basis of the state.

In short, these are the people doing their utmost to promote their forecast of a lost Jewish majority.

In order to preserve what they call the "character of the state," they add insult to injury, and preach about the need to give the enemy the heart of the historic Jewish homeland, and wipe out Jewish biblical roots. Simultaneously, they fight against every authentic, contemporary expression of Jewishness in the state of Israel, starting with Shabbat, and continuing with education, culture, kashrut, stopping profligate sexuality, and more.

It is those to whom a Jewish majority isn't critical that are strengthening the Jewish demographic future.

They are the ones who have large families, who provide a strong Jewish education to their children which cultivates a clear sense of Jewish identity and belonging. They guarantee that their children will perpetuate their Jewish heritage. It is because of them that the "visionaries of democracy" will continue to live in a Jewish state and amuse themselves tossing about their inane ideas.

The writer is a spokesman of the Hebron Jewish Community


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: conflict; demographics; israel; palestinian; population
I nearly fell of my chair when I realized this was printed in Ha'aretz. Well written...
1 posted on 08/28/2002 2:24:30 AM PDT by mmmmmmmm....... donuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mmmmmmmm....... donuts
I agree. Considering Haaretz is the daily infommercial of Israel's Extreme Left its a surprise Noam Arnon's article appeared in its pages. After all, this is the same paper the continually portrays the Jews of Hebron as Israel's equivalent of Southern rednecks. Arnon's point is well taken: the Jewish people's title to their country was given by God and is not dependent on numerical considerations. If Theodor Herzl and the early Zionist thinkers had been "realists," Israel would never have come into existence. All of the demographic projections about Israel being overrun in a few decades time by Arabs have been alarmist and have to date proven false. As long as Jews hold steadfast to the land, Arab efforts to uproot them will ultimately fail. And considering Israel is now in the midst of a war, more not less, Jewish unity is needed in order to defeat the Arabs decisively in order to convince then they have no chance of overwhelming the Jewish state by force. Would that Israel's Extreme Left realized Oslo does not work, Israel would be on the road to the tranquillity and security for which she longs. That is the tragedy.
2 posted on 08/28/2002 2:37:29 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson